EDELSTEIN!
So let’s say you’re a film critic. Let’s say you’re a film critic at a widely distributed publication! That happens to be located in New York, which means that you get to see a LOT of movies, because not only does New York allow you access to all the big blockbusters, but the independent and foreign films actually play there as well, and your publication would actually like you to review them. This seems to me to suggest that you would be exposed to a higher number of thoughtful accounts of experiences that are Not Your Own than the average American male living in, say, the Midwest. This seems to me to suggest that you ought to be capable of a higher level of commentary on a movie about young women than the following:
It’s Fanning’s movie: You can taste the ex–child actor’s relish for playing “jailbait.” But can she be ogled in good conscience? The taste is sweet and sour.
Now, I haven’t seen this movie. But I mean, look. I get that this is a movie in which two young starlets are, among other things, engaging in same-sex making out and possibly sex scenes. I also get that for no reason at all straight men the world over appear to think means they’re doing it so that men in the audience can be titillated as opposed to because, you know, that it’s independently enjoyable for young women THEMSELVES independent of the effect on horny men in movie theatres. I also get, and think very firmly, that young women, even 15 and 16-year-olds, are sexual beings, and that insisting that any portrayal of young women in the media be stripped of all sexual content is not only unrealistic, it is infantilizing.
HOWEVER.



















