<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adventures in Darwinism: Sperm Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/adventures-in-darwinism-sperm-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/adventures-in-darwinism-sperm-competition/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 05:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ninakitten</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/adventures-in-darwinism-sperm-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-4106</link>
		<dc:creator>ninakitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3084#comment-4106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone ever read &quot;Dr. Tatiana&#039;s Sex Advice to All Creation&quot; ? If you&#039;re interested in this type of thing, it&#039;s an awesome read :).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone ever read &#8220;Dr. Tatiana&#8217;s Sex Advice to All Creation&#8221; ? If you&#8217;re interested in this type of thing, it&#8217;s an awesome read <img src='http://www.harpyness.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redhead_Reading</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/adventures-in-darwinism-sperm-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-4062</link>
		<dc:creator>Redhead_Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3084#comment-4062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait, wait, wait, I read in a Discovery article that sperm is actually very weak stuff with no aim and it gets though the cervic mucus by working as a team (and luck) it reaches the egg which is way bigger and hooks it and drags him toward her to stop him escaping because sperm doesn&#039;t actually burrow into the egg or anything at all, sperm is better at escaping. I suppose speed would be important, but never is the stuff I&#039;ve written talked about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, wait, wait, I read in a Discovery article that sperm is actually very weak stuff with no aim and it gets though the cervic mucus by working as a team (and luck) it reaches the egg which is way bigger and hooks it and drags him toward her to stop him escaping because sperm doesn&#8217;t actually burrow into the egg or anything at all, sperm is better at escaping. I suppose speed would be important, but never is the stuff I&#8217;ve written talked about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beyondviolet</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/adventures-in-darwinism-sperm-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-4057</link>
		<dc:creator>beyondviolet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3084#comment-4057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read an article years ago (circa 2002) that showed supermicroscopic photos of conception. The photos revealed that the egg sends out a filament which grabs a sperm and draws it in, essentially debunking the whole &quot;fastest swimmers&quot; mythology because it&#039;s all about which sperm the egg chooses to let in.

The piece talked about how this discovery was going to radically change the way we conceptualize conception. I had never heard anything like it before or since, and now really wish I had saved the article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article years ago (circa 2002) that showed supermicroscopic photos of conception. The photos revealed that the egg sends out a filament which grabs a sperm and draws it in, essentially debunking the whole &#8220;fastest swimmers&#8221; mythology because it&#8217;s all about which sperm the egg chooses to let in.</p>
<p>The piece talked about how this discovery was going to radically change the way we conceptualize conception. I had never heard anything like it before or since, and now really wish I had saved the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spark</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/adventures-in-darwinism-sperm-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-4042</link>
		<dc:creator>Spark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3084#comment-4042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the explanations, Becky. I couldn&#039;t bring myself to google a phrase including the word &quot;testicle&quot; for more info. I guess I&#039;m the opposite when it comes to Savage Love google challenges.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanations, Becky. I couldn&#8217;t bring myself to google a phrase including the word &#8220;testicle&#8221; for more info. I guess I&#8217;m the opposite when it comes to Savage Love google challenges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeckySharper</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/adventures-in-darwinism-sperm-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-4036</link>
		<dc:creator>BeckySharper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3084#comment-4036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, 52% v. 49% is very statistically significant, particularly in medicine.

Spark&#039;s right; one of the funny things I found in searching on sperm competition is that in the primate family there&#039;s a direct evolutionary cause-and-effect between the size of the male&#039;s junk and female monogamy. Chimp females mate promiscuously, so the males have evolved huge testicles and ejaculate huge quantities of semen in order to give them a better shot--so to speak--at fertilization. In gorilla society, though, the alpha male dominates the females so that they don&#039;t routinely mate with other males and, not surprisingly, gorillas have relatively small testicles and quantities of ejaculate.  Humans fall in the middle of the two extremes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, 52% v. 49% is very statistically significant, particularly in medicine.</p>
<p>Spark&#8217;s right; one of the funny things I found in searching on sperm competition is that in the primate family there&#8217;s a direct evolutionary cause-and-effect between the size of the male&#8217;s junk and female monogamy. Chimp females mate promiscuously, so the males have evolved huge testicles and ejaculate huge quantities of semen in order to give them a better shot&#8211;so to speak&#8211;at fertilization. In gorilla society, though, the alpha male dominates the females so that they don&#8217;t routinely mate with other males and, not surprisingly, gorillas have relatively small testicles and quantities of ejaculate.  Humans fall in the middle of the two extremes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spark</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/adventures-in-darwinism-sperm-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-4030</link>
		<dc:creator>Spark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3084#comment-4030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is 52% v. 49% statistically significant? But yeah, I think science has debunked the &quot;women are naturally monogamous&quot; thing. I recall some study that correlated testicle size to number of partners the female of the species tends to have, and homo sapiens came out somewhere in the middle of the slutty-chaste (big ball-little ball)spectrum.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is 52% v. 49% statistically significant? But yeah, I think science has debunked the &#8220;women are naturally monogamous&#8221; thing. I recall some study that correlated testicle size to number of partners the female of the species tends to have, and homo sapiens came out somewhere in the middle of the slutty-chaste (big ball-little ball)spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/adventures-in-darwinism-sperm-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-4026</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3084#comment-4026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to see some other studies before I buy it.  The effect&#039;s pretty small.

Anyways, the effect in us is nowhere near what other species go through for sperm competition.  In one of my bio labs in college, the professor warned the men of the immasculating effect of comparing our sperm size against other species&#039;.

Dragonflies have barbed hooks on the male organ to scrape out semen before ejaculating himself.  A male coyote&#039;s penis swells after ejaculation, lodging his member in the female until such time as it&#039;s virtually guaranteed that his won&#039;t be out-competed by the next guy.

It looks painful for all parties.  I&#039;m pretty sure I&#039;d like sex a lot less if it worked like this for us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see some other studies before I buy it.  The effect&#8217;s pretty small.</p>
<p>Anyways, the effect in us is nowhere near what other species go through for sperm competition.  In one of my bio labs in college, the professor warned the men of the immasculating effect of comparing our sperm size against other species&#8217;.</p>
<p>Dragonflies have barbed hooks on the male organ to scrape out semen before ejaculating himself.  A male coyote&#8217;s penis swells after ejaculation, lodging his member in the female until such time as it&#8217;s virtually guaranteed that his won&#8217;t be out-competed by the next guy.</p>
<p>It looks painful for all parties.  I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;d like sex a lot less if it worked like this for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/adventures-in-darwinism-sperm-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-4015</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3084#comment-4015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This study was covered on the AWESOME NPR show Radiolab.  They also discuss how people over time have conceptualized sperm and fertility.  For example, because sperm is visible and ejects from the male body, for a long time people thought that everything to make a person was in male sperm, making women no more than an incubator.  The gender relations that spring from these scientific conceptions of sperm are so fascinating. 

http://www.wnyc.org/shows/radiolab/episodes/2008/11/21]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This study was covered on the AWESOME NPR show Radiolab.  They also discuss how people over time have conceptualized sperm and fertility.  For example, because sperm is visible and ejects from the male body, for a long time people thought that everything to make a person was in male sperm, making women no more than an incubator.  The gender relations that spring from these scientific conceptions of sperm are so fascinating. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnyc.org/shows/radiolab/episodes/2008/11/21" rel="nofollow">http://www.wnyc.org/shows/radiolab/episodes/2008/11/21</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
