<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking:  The Pope is NOT Dope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhDork</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/comment-page-1/#comment-4093</link>
		<dc:creator>PhDork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3318#comment-4093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s really dangerous to talk about &quot;Africans&quot; in any context, contrarian, but especially if you&#039;re throwing around judgments.  There are 61 territories and more than 900 million people on that continent, with more ethnic groups, languages and faith traditions than I can count.

I&#039;ve heard of &quot;dry sex,&quot; and I don&#039;t doubt that it is a cultural complication, but nobody needs the Pope (or anyone else) talking shit like &quot;condoms are the problem.&quot;  Cameroonians need the Pope (and everyone else) saying &quot;condoms prevent disease,&quot; &quot;it&#039;s cool to use condoms,&quot; &quot;it isn&#039;t &#039;manly&#039; to spread disease,&quot; etc.    And they need education, and free condoms, and medical care to contol the spread of HIV.  Not lies and bullshit, or racially-dodgy talk about &quot;culture.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s really dangerous to talk about &#8220;Africans&#8221; in any context, contrarian, but especially if you&#8217;re throwing around judgments.  There are 61 territories and more than 900 million people on that continent, with more ethnic groups, languages and faith traditions than I can count.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard of &#8220;dry sex,&#8221; and I don&#8217;t doubt that it is a cultural complication, but nobody needs the Pope (or anyone else) talking shit like &#8220;condoms are the problem.&#8221;  Cameroonians need the Pope (and everyone else) saying &#8220;condoms prevent disease,&#8221; &#8220;it&#8217;s cool to use condoms,&#8221; &#8220;it isn&#8217;t &#8216;manly&#8217; to spread disease,&#8221; etc.    And they need education, and free condoms, and medical care to contol the spread of HIV.  Not lies and bullshit, or racially-dodgy talk about &#8220;culture.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdregent</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/comment-page-1/#comment-4090</link>
		<dc:creator>jdregent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3318#comment-4090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think we necessarily disagree, contrarian.  I work on health in subsaharan africa so i&#039;m aware of the issues you speak of, however i would argue that most of that goes to issues of development and the status of women.  which brings us back to laughingrat&#039;s point.  If the pope was saying, condoms won&#039;t stop aids because the status of women is too low to allow them to meaningfully negotiate safer sex practices, then I would agree with him.  But that&#039;s not what he&#039;s saying.  He&#039;s saying that condoms are bad because they promote and spread unchaste behaviors, which has been proved to be incorrect by many studies which I can find and link you to if you&#039;d like.  I&#039;d also point out that that salon article is very old, and the reasons for the high rate of HIV in certain subsaharan african countries is very complex and can&#039;t be reduced to a preference for dry sex (this is also not a universal practice in high HIV incidence areas).  Condoms, in concert with many other interventions, do indeed have a demonstrable effect on rates of HIV transmission.  Of course you can&#039;t just distribute them absent education and information.  But who besides the Pope thinks that is what anti-AIDS practitioners are suggesting?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we necessarily disagree, contrarian.  I work on health in subsaharan africa so i&#8217;m aware of the issues you speak of, however i would argue that most of that goes to issues of development and the status of women.  which brings us back to laughingrat&#8217;s point.  If the pope was saying, condoms won&#8217;t stop aids because the status of women is too low to allow them to meaningfully negotiate safer sex practices, then I would agree with him.  But that&#8217;s not what he&#8217;s saying.  He&#8217;s saying that condoms are bad because they promote and spread unchaste behaviors, which has been proved to be incorrect by many studies which I can find and link you to if you&#8217;d like.  I&#8217;d also point out that that salon article is very old, and the reasons for the high rate of HIV in certain subsaharan african countries is very complex and can&#8217;t be reduced to a preference for dry sex (this is also not a universal practice in high HIV incidence areas).  Condoms, in concert with many other interventions, do indeed have a demonstrable effect on rates of HIV transmission.  Of course you can&#8217;t just distribute them absent education and information.  But who besides the Pope thinks that is what anti-AIDS practitioners are suggesting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/comment-page-1/#comment-4087</link>
		<dc:creator>contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3318#comment-4087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;does he think subsaharan africans are just more reckless sexually than the rest of the world? is that why they carry 65% of the world’s HIV load?&lt;/i&gt;

They are, and yes.

Many Westerners get uncomfortable about judging cultural practices, especially w.r.t. Africans because of our long, nefarious history. And I sympathize with that view, but in this case it is absolutely correct to blame reckless sexual practices (specifically, male insistence on &quot;dry sex&quot; with women) for the high rates of HIV infection. [Unless your idea of responsible sexual behavior includes rubbing dirt mixed with babboon urine into the vagina immediately before sex.]

More info, if you dare:

http://www.salon.com/health/sex/urge/world/1999/12/10/drysex/

BTW, I&#039;m not Catholic and I do favor condom usage (both locally and globally), but in this instance the Pope is probably correct that condoms won&#039;t reduce the spread of HIV because (1) African men won&#039;t wear condoms even if they&#039;re available, (2) African women are raised not to question or refuse African men&#039;s desires, and (3) dry sex means many (most?) condoms would break anyway. Culture trumps condoms, I&#039;m afraid.

Condoms certainly won&#039;t increase HIV, though; that&#039;s just stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>does he think subsaharan africans are just more reckless sexually than the rest of the world? is that why they carry 65% of the world’s HIV load?</i></p>
<p>They are, and yes.</p>
<p>Many Westerners get uncomfortable about judging cultural practices, especially w.r.t. Africans because of our long, nefarious history. And I sympathize with that view, but in this case it is absolutely correct to blame reckless sexual practices (specifically, male insistence on &#8220;dry sex&#8221; with women) for the high rates of HIV infection. [Unless your idea of responsible sexual behavior includes rubbing dirt mixed with babboon urine into the vagina immediately before sex.]</p>
<p>More info, if you dare:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/health/sex/urge/world/1999/12/10/drysex/" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/health/sex/urge/world/1999/12/10/drysex/</a></p>
<p>BTW, I&#8217;m not Catholic and I do favor condom usage (both locally and globally), but in this instance the Pope is probably correct that condoms won&#8217;t reduce the spread of HIV because (1) African men won&#8217;t wear condoms even if they&#8217;re available, (2) African women are raised not to question or refuse African men&#8217;s desires, and (3) dry sex means many (most?) condoms would break anyway. Culture trumps condoms, I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
<p>Condoms certainly won&#8217;t increase HIV, though; that&#8217;s just stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeckySharper</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/comment-page-1/#comment-4084</link>
		<dc:creator>BeckySharper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3318#comment-4084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, JPII was just a kinder, gentler, more crowd-friendly face for the same hard-line misogyny. Remember, Ratzinger was JPII&#039;s henchman when he ran the Inquisition (which has been re-branded as &quot;Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith&quot;). A lot of JPII&#039;s conservative policy bullshit came straight from Ratzy.  They were a bit like Bush and Cheney.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, JPII was just a kinder, gentler, more crowd-friendly face for the same hard-line misogyny. Remember, Ratzinger was JPII&#8217;s henchman when he ran the Inquisition (which has been re-branded as &#8220;Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith&#8221;). A lot of JPII&#8217;s conservative policy bullshit came straight from Ratzy.  They were a bit like Bush and Cheney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel S.</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/comment-page-1/#comment-4079</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3318#comment-4079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, be moral and responsible: BY USING A GODDAMN CONDOM!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, be moral and responsible: BY USING A GODDAMN CONDOM!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdregent</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/comment-page-1/#comment-4069</link>
		<dc:creator>jdregent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3318#comment-4069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JPII was decidedly not better on this issue.  He was the one who really harped on contraception being evil.  This is actually Benny&#039;s first statement on it as pope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JPII was decidedly not better on this issue.  He was the one who really harped on contraception being evil.  This is actually Benny&#8217;s first statement on it as pope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DangerMouse</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/comment-page-1/#comment-4063</link>
		<dc:creator>DangerMouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3318#comment-4063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can we have JPII back please? I mean, not ideal, but better....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we have JPII back please? I mean, not ideal, but better&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laughingrat</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/comment-page-1/#comment-4048</link>
		<dc:creator>Laughingrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3318#comment-4048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*bows*

When I&#039;m Pope, cheese is gonna be the new sacrament.

That would be an awesome internet meme.  &quot;When I&#039;m Pope, I&#039;ll...&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*bows*</p>
<p>When I&#8217;m Pope, cheese is gonna be the new sacrament.</p>
<p>That would be an awesome internet meme.  &#8220;When I&#8217;m Pope, I&#8217;ll&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahMC</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/comment-page-1/#comment-4038</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3318#comment-4038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laughingrat FTW!

LOL @ Soalg, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laughingrat FTW!</p>
<p>LOL @ Soalg, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah.of.a.lesser.god</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/03/18/breaking-the-pope-is-not-dope/comment-page-1/#comment-4037</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah.of.a.lesser.god</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=3318#comment-4037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laughingrat &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Laughing Ratzinger.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laughingrat >>>>>>>>>> Laughing Ratzinger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
