<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High Fidelity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for High Fidelity - The Pursuit of Harpyness [harpyness.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-14255</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for High Fidelity - The Pursuit of Harpyness [harpyness.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=6469#comment-14255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] High Fidelity - The Pursuit of Harpyness  www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  #The Pursuit of Harpyness » High Fidelity Comments Feed The Pursuit of Harpyness Honorary Harpy: Kate Winslet Coraline, Live! Brides Before Babies! (in every sense) RSS 2.0 RSS .92 Atom 0.3 &#8212; From the page [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] High Fidelity &#8211; The Pursuit of Harpyness  <a href="http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity" rel="nofollow">http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity</a> &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  #The Pursuit of Harpyness » High Fidelity Comments Feed The Pursuit of Harpyness Honorary Harpy: Kate Winslet Coraline, Live! Brides Before Babies! (in every sense) RSS 2.0 RSS .92 Atom 0.3 &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmandaS</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-8462</link>
		<dc:creator>AmandaS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=6469#comment-8462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for the marriage-centricity of Edmond, I may not have a very good perspective.  It does seem to be Expected-with-a-capital-E that every young person will marry and live happily ever after.  Married relationships are given a much higher value.  But I don&#039;t really think it is worse here than average.  When I lived in Utah, marriage was a much more important part of the local culture.  (Try being unmarried in the maternity ward there...  even with the father present the whole time, the disapproval was tucked around me like a scratchy hospital blanket.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the marriage-centricity of Edmond, I may not have a very good perspective.  It does seem to be Expected-with-a-capital-E that every young person will marry and live happily ever after.  Married relationships are given a much higher value.  But I don&#8217;t really think it is worse here than average.  When I lived in Utah, marriage was a much more important part of the local culture.  (Try being unmarried in the maternity ward there&#8230;  even with the father present the whole time, the disapproval was tucked around me like a scratchy hospital blanket.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misscalculate</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-8459</link>
		<dc:creator>misscalculate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=6469#comment-8459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@bellacoker. I think you said it well. I think once we go down the path of &quot;if I can just control this one more thing THEN I&#039;ll be guaranteed this relationship will last&quot; it can become a slippery slope. There are no guarantees and it is certainly not a black and white situation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bellacoker. I think you said it well. I think once we go down the path of &#8220;if I can just control this one more thing THEN I&#8217;ll be guaranteed this relationship will last&#8221; it can become a slippery slope. There are no guarantees and it is certainly not a black and white situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellacoker</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-8449</link>
		<dc:creator>bellacoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=6469#comment-8449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That article seems to point to the flaws in MARRIAGE so much more than the flaws in social networking.  I read it as, &quot;Technology offers more proof that you can&#039;t promise to love someone forever.&quot;

Sure, your husband/wife might reconnect with an old flame on facebook and leave you, but they might meet a nice person at the corner store and leave you as well.  If we are truly committed to ensuring another person&#039;s happiness, shouldn&#039;t that include things that might make us unhappy?  Why does it all have to be so black and white?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That article seems to point to the flaws in MARRIAGE so much more than the flaws in social networking.  I read it as, &#8220;Technology offers more proof that you can&#8217;t promise to love someone forever.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure, your husband/wife might reconnect with an old flame on facebook and leave you, but they might meet a nice person at the corner store and leave you as well.  If we are truly committed to ensuring another person&#8217;s happiness, shouldn&#8217;t that include things that might make us unhappy?  Why does it all have to be so black and white?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misscalculate</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-8447</link>
		<dc:creator>misscalculate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=6469#comment-8447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand that everyone needs to set boundaries that are appropriate for them in their relationship and their boundaries may be great for them but wouldn&#039;t work for my relationship. This article though is trying to establish a trend that MANY couples should be worried about. That I don&#039;t buy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that everyone needs to set boundaries that are appropriate for them in their relationship and their boundaries may be great for them but wouldn&#8217;t work for my relationship. This article though is trying to establish a trend that MANY couples should be worried about. That I don&#8217;t buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DangerMouse</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-8438</link>
		<dc:creator>DangerMouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=6469#comment-8438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, JD, I mean paranoid about your relationship and your partner cheating, not paranoid about the internet! I am all sorts of paranoid about the internet!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, JD, I mean paranoid about your relationship and your partner cheating, not paranoid about the internet! I am all sorts of paranoid about the internet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: margosita</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-8410</link>
		<dc:creator>margosita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=6469#comment-8410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is such an interesting post.  Social networking is changing so many aspects of relationships and this is an interesting one to consider.

I agree that it is insane to expect your SO to give you their password, and vice versa.  I don&#039;t mind my SO seeing my e-mail if I&#039;m logged in and he&#039;s around, and same goes for fb.  But unlimited access, anywhere, without my knowledge?  Not ok.  We&#039;re separate people!  I think Kivrin is right about, &quot;I think access to too much information can make people paranoid.&quot;  It wouldn&#039;t be healthy for me to feel like I need to or should be checking on my SO&#039;s every facebook move.  Intimacy isn&#039;t knowing everything about a person, it is wanting to share almost everything with a person.  

And I don&#039;t know, don&#039;t you want your SO to retain some mystery?  A lot of my e-mail is pretty mundane, and when we were first dating my SO would tell me I was such an &quot;enigma.&quot;  Of course I&#039;m not, and we have been together long enough that he doesn&#039;t think that much either, but it was sweet of him to think so and unraveling from enigma to real girl was a pleasure for both of us.  If he had unfetted access to my online persona, we&#039;d have lost that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such an interesting post.  Social networking is changing so many aspects of relationships and this is an interesting one to consider.</p>
<p>I agree that it is insane to expect your SO to give you their password, and vice versa.  I don&#8217;t mind my SO seeing my e-mail if I&#8217;m logged in and he&#8217;s around, and same goes for fb.  But unlimited access, anywhere, without my knowledge?  Not ok.  We&#8217;re separate people!  I think Kivrin is right about, &#8220;I think access to too much information can make people paranoid.&#8221;  It wouldn&#8217;t be healthy for me to feel like I need to or should be checking on my SO&#8217;s every facebook move.  Intimacy isn&#8217;t knowing everything about a person, it is wanting to share almost everything with a person.  </p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t know, don&#8217;t you want your SO to retain some mystery?  A lot of my e-mail is pretty mundane, and when we were first dating my SO would tell me I was such an &#8220;enigma.&#8221;  Of course I&#8217;m not, and we have been together long enough that he doesn&#8217;t think that much either, but it was sweet of him to think so and unraveling from enigma to real girl was a pleasure for both of us.  If he had unfetted access to my online persona, we&#8217;d have lost that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kivrin</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-8393</link>
		<dc:creator>Kivrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=6469#comment-8393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm. I&#039;m getting married soon, but I still keep all my online stuff as private as possible.  I mean, the bf and I are &quot;friends&quot; on Facebook, but we don&#039;t have each other&#039;s passwords to anything.  He doesn&#039;t necessarily need to know the contents or recipients of every e-mail I send, just as I don&#039;t need to know all of his.  If some ex-girlfriend sent him a catching-up e-mail, I don&#039;t really want or need to know about it.  (If he started showing outward signs of emotional or physical betrayal, that&#039;s when I&#039;d get worried.)  I think access to too much information can make people paranoid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. I&#8217;m getting married soon, but I still keep all my online stuff as private as possible.  I mean, the bf and I are &#8220;friends&#8221; on Facebook, but we don&#8217;t have each other&#8217;s passwords to anything.  He doesn&#8217;t necessarily need to know the contents or recipients of every e-mail I send, just as I don&#8217;t need to know all of his.  If some ex-girlfriend sent him a catching-up e-mail, I don&#8217;t really want or need to know about it.  (If he started showing outward signs of emotional or physical betrayal, that&#8217;s when I&#8217;d get worried.)  I think access to too much information can make people paranoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Av0gadro</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-8387</link>
		<dc:creator>Av0gadro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=6469#comment-8387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My husband and I have access to each other&#039;s email and facebook accounts because they&#039;re open on our respective computers. The idea of demanding such access horrifies me. We have access because we trust each other, we don&#039;t need access to trust each other, if that makes sense.

In regards to the Facebook moms thing, I know lots of moms who do this. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a bad thing for a few reasons. First, a lot of my Facebook friends are my friends specifically because they want easy access to pics of my kid. My gramma didn&#039;t join Facebook to hear about the movie I saw last night. Second, a lot of moms of young kids use Facebook to connect to each other. Talking about non-kid things is important, but so is talking to other women who are going through exactly what you are right now. Having a picture of your kid as your own profile advertises that you&#039;re a mom and you want to talk about it.

Third, posting cute pictures of your kid is bragging just as much as posting pictures of yourself. Being proud that your kid is the cuter than bunnies and kittens isn&#039;t ignoring your own identity. It&#039;s just admitting that your toddler is cuter than you are. Which he is. Trust me.

Funnyface, I definitely rage against people who see me as only a mom. It was a real problem when I was pregnant, before I quit my job. My coworkers were awful and I wanted to scream at them. But it didn&#039;t take long to find people who wanted to talk about books and TV and politics. And other moms are almost always grateful to be able to talk about both their kids and all that other stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband and I have access to each other&#8217;s email and facebook accounts because they&#8217;re open on our respective computers. The idea of demanding such access horrifies me. We have access because we trust each other, we don&#8217;t need access to trust each other, if that makes sense.</p>
<p>In regards to the Facebook moms thing, I know lots of moms who do this. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a bad thing for a few reasons. First, a lot of my Facebook friends are my friends specifically because they want easy access to pics of my kid. My gramma didn&#8217;t join Facebook to hear about the movie I saw last night. Second, a lot of moms of young kids use Facebook to connect to each other. Talking about non-kid things is important, but so is talking to other women who are going through exactly what you are right now. Having a picture of your kid as your own profile advertises that you&#8217;re a mom and you want to talk about it.</p>
<p>Third, posting cute pictures of your kid is bragging just as much as posting pictures of yourself. Being proud that your kid is the cuter than bunnies and kittens isn&#8217;t ignoring your own identity. It&#8217;s just admitting that your toddler is cuter than you are. Which he is. Trust me.</p>
<p>Funnyface, I definitely rage against people who see me as only a mom. It was a real problem when I was pregnant, before I quit my job. My coworkers were awful and I wanted to scream at them. But it didn&#8217;t take long to find people who wanted to talk about books and TV and politics. And other moms are almost always grateful to be able to talk about both their kids and all that other stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdregent</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/14/high-fidelity/comment-page-1/#comment-8386</link>
		<dc:creator>jdregent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=6469#comment-8386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hear you Britni.  I think it is totally legit to say &quot;don&#039;t read my blog&quot; and have it anyway but i just didn&#039;t want you to actually be putting yourself at risk in any way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you Britni.  I think it is totally legit to say &#8220;don&#8217;t read my blog&#8221; and have it anyway but i just didn&#8217;t want you to actually be putting yourself at risk in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
