<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Devastating News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/</link>
	<description>As narrated by five of the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:09:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Same Battle, 131 Years Ago - The Pursuit of Harpyness</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/comment-page-2/#comment-9608</link>
		<dc:creator>The Same Battle, 131 Years Ago - The Pursuit of Harpyness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=7058#comment-9608</guid>
		<description>[...] a week after the murder of Dr. George Tiller, the New York Times has a poignant op-ed column today about the death of Ann Lohman. Lohman died in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a week after the murder of Dr. George Tiller, the New York Times has a poignant op-ed column today about the death of Ann Lohman. Lohman died in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baraqiel</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/comment-page-2/#comment-9371</link>
		<dc:creator>baraqiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=7058#comment-9371</guid>
		<description>rednrowdy -- In other words, the anti-choice side has to concede that abortion should be legal (or that they&#039;re not really fighting for the well-being of &quot;the unborn&quot;, they&#039;re fighting to be able to control women&#039;s lives and bodies).  That&#039;s not a middle ground.  That&#039;s them conceding defeat.

As for what the pro-choice side should admit -- I disagree, and here&#039;s why.  I think women should be able to talk about their abortions however they choose.  They should be able to joke if they want or sob if they want.  Like any other experience, abortion is not the same for every woman.  I agree that the pro-choice side should acknowledge that abortion can be an experience that is sad, gut-wrenching, or agonizing, and I think that almost all of us do.  But it&#039;s not always that way, and we shouldn&#039;t make everyone pretend like it is.  The experiences of women who joke about their abortions are just as valid as the experiences of women who sob (and sometimes people even do both or neither!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rednrowdy &#8212; In other words, the anti-choice side has to concede that abortion should be legal (or that they&#8217;re not really fighting for the well-being of &#8220;the unborn&#8221;, they&#8217;re fighting to be able to control women&#8217;s lives and bodies).  That&#8217;s not a middle ground.  That&#8217;s them conceding defeat.</p>
<p>As for what the pro-choice side should admit &#8212; I disagree, and here&#8217;s why.  I think women should be able to talk about their abortions however they choose.  They should be able to joke if they want or sob if they want.  Like any other experience, abortion is not the same for every woman.  I agree that the pro-choice side should acknowledge that abortion can be an experience that is sad, gut-wrenching, or agonizing, and I think that almost all of us do.  But it&#8217;s not always that way, and we shouldn&#8217;t make everyone pretend like it is.  The experiences of women who joke about their abortions are just as valid as the experiences of women who sob (and sometimes people even do both or neither!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rednrowdy</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/comment-page-2/#comment-9343</link>
		<dc:creator>rednrowdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=7058#comment-9343</guid>
		<description>hanu maru, having exams at PP means that you are paying money to PP and thereby supporting PP.  trust me when i say that people who are truly anti-choice don&#039;t go to PP for ANYTHING and were horrified when i told them i went there for an exam.  but again, i have nothing to prove to you or to anyone.  you feel the need to be very derogatory to me where i was not derogatory to you, so fine and good luck with that.  i don&#039;t do flame wars with anyone, but i do not like to see one side of anything painted with a wide brush stroke, and if you feel need to use it, go right ahead, but remember there are lots of shades of gray in there, just like your own anti-choice friend who went to pp for an abortion.  

sarahmc, both sides must concede the following:

anti-abortion:  that outlawing abortions will not make the need or occurrence of abortions cease at all. that outlawing abortions will not make all women give birth to happy healthy babies that will be raised in happy, healthy homes.

pro-choice:  that the act of abortion is of itself not as simple as elective plastic surgery.  you may argue that most pro-choicers already know that, but reading about women saying that they just loooooooooved getting their abortion and would do it again, however tongue-in-cheek it may be, just reinforces that many pro-choice people feel abortion is just a simple, routine procedure and it really isn&#039;t.  

that is how i see it.  i&#039;m probably completely, ethically, intellectually ridiculous to you, but it&#039;s my opinion.  
and now, i&#039;m walking away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hanu maru, having exams at PP means that you are paying money to PP and thereby supporting PP.  trust me when i say that people who are truly anti-choice don&#8217;t go to PP for ANYTHING and were horrified when i told them i went there for an exam.  but again, i have nothing to prove to you or to anyone.  you feel the need to be very derogatory to me where i was not derogatory to you, so fine and good luck with that.  i don&#8217;t do flame wars with anyone, but i do not like to see one side of anything painted with a wide brush stroke, and if you feel need to use it, go right ahead, but remember there are lots of shades of gray in there, just like your own anti-choice friend who went to pp for an abortion.  </p>
<p>sarahmc, both sides must concede the following:</p>
<p>anti-abortion:  that outlawing abortions will not make the need or occurrence of abortions cease at all. that outlawing abortions will not make all women give birth to happy healthy babies that will be raised in happy, healthy homes.</p>
<p>pro-choice:  that the act of abortion is of itself not as simple as elective plastic surgery.  you may argue that most pro-choicers already know that, but reading about women saying that they just loooooooooved getting their abortion and would do it again, however tongue-in-cheek it may be, just reinforces that many pro-choice people feel abortion is just a simple, routine procedure and it really isn&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>that is how i see it.  i&#8217;m probably completely, ethically, intellectually ridiculous to you, but it&#8217;s my opinion.<br />
and now, i&#8217;m walking away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahMC</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/comment-page-2/#comment-9342</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=7058#comment-9342</guid>
		<description>I am curious about what this elusive &quot;middle ground&quot; looks like, in the minds of anti-choicers.  What, exactly, must the pro-choice side give up?  There are already restrictions on abortion.  

This is a serious question and I&#039;m curious about your answer, Rednrowdy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious about what this elusive &#8220;middle ground&#8221; looks like, in the minds of anti-choicers.  What, exactly, must the pro-choice side give up?  There are already restrictions on abortion.  </p>
<p>This is a serious question and I&#8217;m curious about your answer, Rednrowdy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hana  Maru</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/comment-page-2/#comment-9332</link>
		<dc:creator>Hana  Maru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=7058#comment-9332</guid>
		<description>rednrowdy, I have no idea what you mean about me being filled with vitriol towards you, or anyone here.  I agree that you were never nasty to me, I never felt that way, or reacted that way.  Indeed I don&#039;t know you personally, which is why I responded only to the position you were defending, and not to your person.  I didn&#039;t ask how you vote, either.  If you read my words again, you&#039;ll notice an &quot;If&quot; not a &quot;When&quot; before the ultra-offensive &quot;you&quot;, as in &quot;If you vote anti-choice and give to anti-choice orgs...you are supporting death by unsafe illegal abortion.&quot;

It&#039;s a well supported fact that women have abortions whether they are safe and legal or not, whether or not you like to think about it or hear it from people who don&#039;t know you.  I stand by this; it&#039;s something more anti-choicers ought to think about if they really care to help women and babies.  

The anti-choice folks I know are moderates and they are otherwise nice people.  They would hate to be called nasty zealots, as you called them.  As I said to Miss Pinot:
&quot;I’ll bet that apart from your desire to compromise my health and freedom, you’re a fine and compassionate person, just like the anti-choicers I know.&quot;

These are people I&#039;ve grown up with, whose children&#039;s names I&#039;ve piped on birthday cakes.  We treat each other with genuine kindness, and if they knew I was pro-choice, I don&#039;t think that would change.  Still, they are working to take away my right to health and privacy, and according to their beliefs, I support mass murder on a scale that exceeds the Holocaust.  They do believe in fighting righteous wars and the death penalty for terrible criminals, as do a large percentage of Americans and the most prominent anti-choice faith leaders.  Thus, they do not believe that only god can take away a man&#039;s life.  It requires dissonance at a certain level for us to get along.  

That you have had exams at PP actually indicates nothing about your political position.  I know one anti-choice woman(not a friend) who believed they were an evil organization, with a mission of racial eugenics.  She went there anyway when she felt she needed an abortion for herself.  They serve many anti-choice women, even their own protesters.  

It is bizarre and illogical for you to conflate anti-choice Americans with Muslims everywhere.  Most Muslims do not believe that America is the great satan, a belief not found in the Koran.  All anti-choicers believe that abortion is murder.  The anti-choice movement regularly employs tactics meant to incite hatred and violence towards doctors, including calling them &quot;mass murderers&quot;, publishing wanted lists with crossed off names of those they have already killed, publishing photos of faces, home addresses, and license plates, etc.  The man in custody for killing Dr. Tiller has been found on Operation Rescue message boards from years ago discussing bringing him to justice.  He is not one lone bad apple.  The movement has to take responsibility for its messages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rednrowdy, I have no idea what you mean about me being filled with vitriol towards you, or anyone here.  I agree that you were never nasty to me, I never felt that way, or reacted that way.  Indeed I don&#8217;t know you personally, which is why I responded only to the position you were defending, and not to your person.  I didn&#8217;t ask how you vote, either.  If you read my words again, you&#8217;ll notice an &#8220;If&#8221; not a &#8220;When&#8221; before the ultra-offensive &#8220;you&#8221;, as in &#8220;If you vote anti-choice and give to anti-choice orgs&#8230;you are supporting death by unsafe illegal abortion.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a well supported fact that women have abortions whether they are safe and legal or not, whether or not you like to think about it or hear it from people who don&#8217;t know you.  I stand by this; it&#8217;s something more anti-choicers ought to think about if they really care to help women and babies.  </p>
<p>The anti-choice folks I know are moderates and they are otherwise nice people.  They would hate to be called nasty zealots, as you called them.  As I said to Miss Pinot:<br />
&#8220;I’ll bet that apart from your desire to compromise my health and freedom, you’re a fine and compassionate person, just like the anti-choicers I know.&#8221;</p>
<p>These are people I&#8217;ve grown up with, whose children&#8217;s names I&#8217;ve piped on birthday cakes.  We treat each other with genuine kindness, and if they knew I was pro-choice, I don&#8217;t think that would change.  Still, they are working to take away my right to health and privacy, and according to their beliefs, I support mass murder on a scale that exceeds the Holocaust.  They do believe in fighting righteous wars and the death penalty for terrible criminals, as do a large percentage of Americans and the most prominent anti-choice faith leaders.  Thus, they do not believe that only god can take away a man&#8217;s life.  It requires dissonance at a certain level for us to get along.  </p>
<p>That you have had exams at PP actually indicates nothing about your political position.  I know one anti-choice woman(not a friend) who believed they were an evil organization, with a mission of racial eugenics.  She went there anyway when she felt she needed an abortion for herself.  They serve many anti-choice women, even their own protesters.  </p>
<p>It is bizarre and illogical for you to conflate anti-choice Americans with Muslims everywhere.  Most Muslims do not believe that America is the great satan, a belief not found in the Koran.  All anti-choicers believe that abortion is murder.  The anti-choice movement regularly employs tactics meant to incite hatred and violence towards doctors, including calling them &#8220;mass murderers&#8221;, publishing wanted lists with crossed off names of those they have already killed, publishing photos of faces, home addresses, and license plates, etc.  The man in custody for killing Dr. Tiller has been found on Operation Rescue message boards from years ago discussing bringing him to justice.  He is not one lone bad apple.  The movement has to take responsibility for its messages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baraqiel</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/comment-page-2/#comment-9324</link>
		<dc:creator>baraqiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=7058#comment-9324</guid>
		<description>rednrowdy - the only way that peace agreement could happen is that Egypt stopped clinging to the philosophy that Israel should stop existing.  Note that the states with which Israel has peace agreements (Egypt, Jordan) have reconciled themselves to the existence of Israel.  Iran, for example, has not, and thus there is no peace because the two sides are mutually exclusive (Israel can be allowed to exist vs. Israel cannot be allowed to exist).  Egypt and Israel did not find a philosophical middle ground; Egypt conceded and accepted Israel&#039;s philosophy.

This serves only to reinforce my point: as long as neither side is willing to concede *philosophically*, there is no middle ground to find.  If the anti-choicers are willing to concede that their philosophy is wrong, just like Egypt did to Israel, then great!  I&#039;ll work with them all they want!  But I don&#039;t see that happening any time soon, do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rednrowdy &#8211; the only way that peace agreement could happen is that Egypt stopped clinging to the philosophy that Israel should stop existing.  Note that the states with which Israel has peace agreements (Egypt, Jordan) have reconciled themselves to the existence of Israel.  Iran, for example, has not, and thus there is no peace because the two sides are mutually exclusive (Israel can be allowed to exist vs. Israel cannot be allowed to exist).  Egypt and Israel did not find a philosophical middle ground; Egypt conceded and accepted Israel&#8217;s philosophy.</p>
<p>This serves only to reinforce my point: as long as neither side is willing to concede *philosophically*, there is no middle ground to find.  If the anti-choicers are willing to concede that their philosophy is wrong, just like Egypt did to Israel, then great!  I&#8217;ll work with them all they want!  But I don&#8217;t see that happening any time soon, do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rednrowdy</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/comment-page-2/#comment-9320</link>
		<dc:creator>rednrowdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=7058#comment-9320</guid>
		<description>baraqiel:  if egypt and israel could sign a peace agreement over 20 years ago and have it stick, then i believe that some kind of middle ground can be found on this, and if you don&#039;t agree with me and think that it&#039;s a fallacy, then that is your problem and not mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>baraqiel:  if egypt and israel could sign a peace agreement over 20 years ago and have it stick, then i believe that some kind of middle ground can be found on this, and if you don&#8217;t agree with me and think that it&#8217;s a fallacy, then that is your problem and not mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emilyanne</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/comment-page-2/#comment-9304</link>
		<dc:creator>emilyanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=7058#comment-9304</guid>
		<description>Spark - hi yes I was because I was also deeply confused by the thread but then I realised my post was actually something of an overreaction for which I apologise as your post was thoroughly reasonable (when not read at 6.30 am by a tired person) although having said that in an odd way it helped me to state my feelings about abortion because one of the things that has always annoyed me is the number of anti-abortion proponents who always assume I must agree with them when I absolutely don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spark &#8211; hi yes I was because I was also deeply confused by the thread but then I realised my post was actually something of an overreaction for which I apologise as your post was thoroughly reasonable (when not read at 6.30 am by a tired person) although having said that in an odd way it helped me to state my feelings about abortion because one of the things that has always annoyed me is the number of anti-abortion proponents who always assume I must agree with them when I absolutely don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baraqiel</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/comment-page-2/#comment-9300</link>
		<dc:creator>baraqiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=7058#comment-9300</guid>
		<description>rednrowdy - You are committing the fallacy of the middle ground.  It is a fallacy to say that because two positions exist that are opposite one another, the &quot;truth&quot; must be somewhere in between.  The fact is that the two sides of this debate are mutually exclusive.  Either abortion is murder, and therefore morally impermissible, or it&#039;s not.  Either you trust women to make their own decisions about their bodies, or you don&#039;t.  It&#039;s not logically (or morally, in my opinion) sound to declare that abortion is only abhorrent sometimes or that women can only make their own choices sometimes.  The two sides are irreconcilable.  There is no philosophical middle ground.  We might be able to work with one another on certain issues such as contraception, for example (although history has proven that this is unlikely), but ultimately one side is right and the other side is wrong, rather than both of us being right a little bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rednrowdy &#8211; You are committing the fallacy of the middle ground.  It is a fallacy to say that because two positions exist that are opposite one another, the &#8220;truth&#8221; must be somewhere in between.  The fact is that the two sides of this debate are mutually exclusive.  Either abortion is murder, and therefore morally impermissible, or it&#8217;s not.  Either you trust women to make their own decisions about their bodies, or you don&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s not logically (or morally, in my opinion) sound to declare that abortion is only abhorrent sometimes or that women can only make their own choices sometimes.  The two sides are irreconcilable.  There is no philosophical middle ground.  We might be able to work with one another on certain issues such as contraception, for example (although history has proven that this is unlikely), but ultimately one side is right and the other side is wrong, rather than both of us being right a little bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rednrowdy</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/05/31/devastating-news/comment-page-2/#comment-9295</link>
		<dc:creator>rednrowdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=7058#comment-9295</guid>
		<description>thank you sarahmc.  all i could find was the extensive coverage on dr. tiller.

all of these murders are disgusting and abominable and anyone who is cheering them is also disgusting and abominable.  full stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you sarahmc.  all i could find was the extensive coverage on dr. tiller.</p>
<p>all of these murders are disgusting and abominable and anyone who is cheering them is also disgusting and abominable.  full stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
