logo

search

  • Home
  • About the Harpies
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
delete
bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Sex-Selection Among Americans of Chinese, Indian and Korean Descent

Posted by SarahMC in Thoughts, Abortion, Children, Misogyny, Race, Reproductive rights on Jun 15, 2009, 11:00am | 8 comments

The preference for males among some Asian-American immigrants has resulted in significant deviations in the proportion of baby boys to baby girls, according to research conducted by professors Lena Edlund and Douglas Almond of Columbia University. More boys than girls are born in the United States, by a ratio of 1.05 to 1. Studying 2000 census data, the pair of economists discovered that among American families of Chinese, Korean and Indian descent, the likelihood of having a boy increased to 1.17 to 1 if the first child was a girl. The ratio for a third child was 1.51 to 1 in favor of boys if the first two children were girls. Demographers say the lopsided ratios reflect the use of sex-selection techniques such as in vitro fertilization, sperm sorting and abortion.

Joyce Moy, executive director of the Asian American/Asian Research Institute of the City University of New York, says some family values prevalent in China, Korea and India have seeped into American culture among even young immigrants, despite the fact that historic reasons for the male preference are less relevant in the U.S.

One Chinese-American mother who was interviewed for the story claims it’s a couple’s parents who apply the most pressure to bear male offspring. That would explain why even Asian-Americans born and raised in the U.S. might exhibit a strong preference for boy babies. Some commenters at the Times verified that that’s the case.

Dr. Jeffrey Steinberg, medical director of the Fertility Institutes, a clinic that offers sex-selection procedures (though not abortion) said, “Culturally, there are a lot of strange things that go on in the world. Whether we agree with it, it’s not harming anyone.” I suppose in a vacuum sex-selection procedures do not harm anyone, unless you count the massive gender imbalance and resulting social unrest in places like China. The devaluation of girls and woman is harmful, but misogyny is the cause; sex-selection procedures are the effect. I also disagree with the doctor’s implication that male supremacy is a foreign concept, practiced in “strange” far away places then exported to the U.S. Please. Americans are less accepting of abortion as a means of seeing their sex preferences to fruition.

I don’t find it difficult, as a feminist, to reconcile my support for abortion on demand with my disgust towards sex-selective abortion. Anti-choicers like to play gotcha with this issue, though their accusations of pro-choice feminist hypocricy are easily refuted. I don’t wish to see girl babies born into families who won’t cherish them. “Every child a wanted child.” It would be unwise to cut off the supply of sex-selection techniques before the demand has dried up. Destroy sexism and the practice will all but disappear.

Bookmark and share this post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • De.lirio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email

8 Responses to “Sex-Selection Among Americans of Chinese, Indian and Korean Descent”

  1. BeckySharper says:
    June 15, 2009 at 11:13 am

    One of the asides in the article–it was so brief I almost didn’t notice it–was that among non-Asian American families, there’s a preference for girls:

    “Dr. Norbert Gleicher, medical director of the Center for Human Reproduction, a fertility and sex-selection clinic in New York and Chicago, said that from his experience, people were more inclined to want female children, except for Asians and Middle Easterners.”

    Is it wrong that I was pleased by this?

  2. bellacoker says:
    June 15, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    I think it’s terribly sad that instead of rare females becoming more valuable (like a market theory would suggest /snark) the population disparity in China has led to kidnapping and sex slavery.

    It’s one of those things where being on either side of perfection is terrible for women. Too many women, like after WWI, poverty and spinsterhood. Too few, rape.

  3. madaha says:
    June 15, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    I dunno, I’m finding a disturbing amount of “boys are better” among white people I know. it’s really creepy

  4. SarahMC says:
    June 15, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    Yep, Madaha, I wrote about it here.

    I think white people are just way less likely to use abortion as a means of sex-selection, whereas American immigrants from, say, China, are used to it. White people will just sulk about their daughters and write tell-all books about that miraculous day they finally got their boy.

  5. Renee says:
    June 15, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    What saddens me is that when we think of the miracle that is life that anyone could choose to end the life of a child due to gender is disgusting. I will always support a womans right to choose but I cannot help but recognize the misogyny in this decision.

  6. Sally says:
    June 15, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    I know it would be hypocritical to draw the (legal) line at sex-selective abortions, but news like this gives me the shakes…

  7. DirtyLaundry says:
    June 15, 2009 at 9:23 pm

    madaha I’m guessing you primarily hang out with whites because that attitude is prevalent in blacks, whites and misogynistic people of all races. However, studies show that girls are often “preferred” in America over boys. Meaning when a family didn’t know the sex of their child they often spoke of hoping the baby was a girl, and over 75% of Americans are white so you may even be a little off there.

  8. lais says:
    July 1, 2009 at 6:59 am

    It is really sad that people will choose to end someones life for any reason. God is the one who created us, so us gods creation, have no right to end someones life. In cases of a woman been sexually abused..there’s options over the counter that’s available now or through a health care that will prevent a woman from getting pregnant after the sexual intercourse. Morning after pill.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

random posts

The Most Ridonkulous Op-Ed of 2010: Audrey Irvine ...
On Thinking of Human Beings as Trash, And Other Tr...
In Defense of Lady Bosses...

recent comments

  • bluebears: You guys look hot in that picture....
  • Cimorene: It makes me inordinately happy to think that a buncha harpie...
  • BeckySharper: @Cat: You're right, of course, about la plage. Although the ...
  • Shadow Boxer: Have Fun! Beach time is required. We'll survive without yo...
  • gherkinfiend: I'm going to need that pickle recipe...if that isn't an auto...
  • Cat: Yes indeed, s'mores are good stuff. I fondly remember making...

Tags

Abortion Activism Anger Anti-feminists Assweasels Beauty Culture Busybodies Children Choosing Your Choice Double Standards Education Empowerfulment Fashion Fat Is A Feminist Issue Feminism Great Male Narcissists Hollywood Ladylike Endeavors LGBT Marriage Masculinity Misogyny Motherhood Overshare Politics Race Racism Rants Religion Reproductive rights Sex Sexism Sexual violence So-Called Self-Improvement Solipsism Stereotypes The Media Theory and Practice Things That Are Awesome Unexpected Consequences Uteri Police Violence against women and girls Women's Health Women's Work Work Administrative Professionals Day (2)
Anonymous Prosecutor (3)
Culcha Vulcha (29)
Feminist Food for Thought (12)
Friday Fun Thread (42)
Guest Post (15)
Harpy Book Club (10)
Harpy Cinematical Society (8)
Harpy Droppings (2)
Harpy Hall of Fame (20)
Harpy Periodical (3)
Harpy Seminar (21)
Harpy Shout-out (50)
Harpy Televisual Society (3)
Heard (1)
Help Me Harpies! (4)
Honorary Harpies (16)
Housekeeping (23)
International Museum of Women (1)
Language Matters (19)
Linkaround (4)
Morning Snark (38)
Reader Request (7)
Retro Pleasures (10)
Solo Flying (53)
Thoughts (806)
You Have Got To Be Fucking Kidding Me (98)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.

Blogroll

  • A Truly Elegant Mess
  • Bitch
  • Bookslut
  • Deeply Problematic
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • F Bomb
  • Feminist Law Professors
  • Feminist Philosophers
  • Feministe
  • Feministing
  • Fugitivus
  • FWD/Forward
  • Geek Feminism
  • gudbuy t'jane
  • Hoyden About Town
  • Hysteria!
  • I Blame the Patriarchy
  • Jezebel
  • Kate Harding’s Shapely Prose
  • Katha Pollitt
  • Like a Whisper
  • Maud Newton
  • Pandagon
  • Racialicious
  • Rage Against the Man-chine
  • Salon’s Broadsheet
  • Shakesville
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Angry Black Woman
  • The Curvature
  • The F Word
  • The Feminist Agenda
  • The Feminist Texican
  • Tiger Beatdown
  • Womanist Musings
  • Women’s Voices for Change

Archives

  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

Search

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN
  • WordPress

Twitter Updates

google

google

.

Copyright © 2010. Creative Commons License
The Pursuit of Harpyness is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes

The harpy art you see in our banner above is by Ursula Dodge. Visit her etsy store!