logo

search

  • Home
  • About the Harpies
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
delete
bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Retro Pleasures: Cooking

Posted by BeckySharper in Retro Pleasures, Thoughts, Double Standards, Women's Work on Jul 1, 2009, 9:00am | 51 comments

I look JUST like this. Via gcacho @ Flickr.

I look JUST like this. Via gcacho @ Flickr.

“My mother was a good recreational cook, but what she basically believed about cooking was that if you worked hard and prospered, someone else would do it for you.”

–Nora Ephron

In the bad old days, cooking was hot, dirty, tedious and exhausting, which is precisely why the Patriarchy assigned it to us (see also: cleaning and child-care). Cooking was ladybusiness and a lady was only as good as the meals she cranked out. As for the rare women who couldn’t cook, well, they were suspect–definitely lazy and maybe even bluestockings!

This mentality hasn’t shifted much, even in these more enlightened times. When Hillary Clinton infamously disaparaged the hallowed domestic arts of baking and hostessing with her comment, “I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas but what I decided to do was fulfill my profession,” the media–and the right-wing–lost their ever-loving minds. The fuss wasn’t just because HRC was standing up for her career but because she was simultaneously rejecting her womanly duty to slave over some cookie sheets. We can safely presume that she could have mitigated the uproar by saying: “Oh, I’m committed to my career, but I still find time to cook for my family.” The problem was that she clearly didn’t seem to regret not baking those cookies. Like Nora Ephron’s mom, HRC was making the point that cooking is not something all women feel compelled to do. Fortunately, women’s lib now gives a lot of us the economic power to outsource it, and for many high-earning women of my acquaintance, there’s a certain pride that comes with announcing: “I had it catered” and “I never cook.”

To my mind, it’s the perfect Catch-22 for women these days: If you aren’t cooking, you’re neglecting your family. Bad mother! If you like cooking, you’re an unliberated throwback. Bad feminist!

So where does that leave those of us who do double duty as feminists and cooks? In yesterday’s comments thread about PhDork’s post about wifely doormattery, frequent commenter baraqiel noted: “stuff like this makes me look at cooking and get the anti-feminist nasties from it, which, hey: get your patriarchy off my hobbies.”

Amen, sister. I’m a feminazi bonerkiller with a successful career who kicks ass in the kitchen. My love of cooking is equal parts nature and nurture: I love to eat, and I’m half Southern Methodist and half New York Jewish, both cultures which absolutely revere home cooking. I could never be Carrie Bradshaw, storing my magazines in my unused oven.

As for gender equity in the kitchen, I confess that I judge men and women equally when they say they can’t cook. Granted, most of the people I know who can’t cook are men, but I have one or two female friends who never learned either. This strikes me as somewhat preposterous. Do you eat? Yes? Then why can’t you make your own meals? I’m not saying you need to whip up souffles and beef Wellington for 10, but basic cooking is something everyone should know.

The joys of cooking are many: it’s a meditative act, a creative act, a sensual act and joyful act (unless your sauce breaks or you start a grease-fire or leave something in the oven too long, in which case, it’s an exercise in frustration and swearing). It’s not, however, a gender-specific act, or at least, it shouldn’t be. Whether I’m baking a cake or making my mom’s two-day chicken soup or whisking an alfredo sauce, it’s all about me and my dinner. The Patriarchy is not invited.

51 Responses to “Retro Pleasures: Cooking”

  1. Jessica says:
    July 5, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    ahimsa said: “I’m 48 and no one that I hang out with sees cooking as a feminist issue other than as part of the much larger issue of the “second shift” that is placed on women.”

    I think the “second shift” is exactly the point here. Lots of women who deliberately choose not to learn to cook aren’t just doing it because they hate all stereotypically feminine things. They’re probably being quite rational and trying to avoid getting stuck with the expectation that they will always be the ones to do the cooking (and associated cleaning, grocery shopping, meal planning, etc.).

    I happen to really enjoy cooking with my boyfriend, and sometimes our schedules work out so that I’m cooking dinner for him since he’s working late. I enjoy it. But it is work, it takes time, and I can definitely understand why some people would choose to sidestep that role.

« Older Comments

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

 

random posts

Auntie Gloria predicts the future....
Don’t hang up that mating towel yet, girls!...
Please Let Me Love You Emma Thompson...

recent comments

  • Emz: I LOVE wearing thongs! I prefer a thicker waistband (think V...
  • Martin Owens: It appears to be at it's core a complaint about the general ...
  • Matthew: I can offer one small defense of the original poster. If you...
  • Rebecca: I am a woman and I love wearing heels. The pain of them is b...
  • Jason: I agree for the most part, but the point at which I take iss...
  • Mr. Nice Guy: "Genuinely nice guys have nothing to worry about. Genuinely ...

Tags

Abortion Activism Anger Anti-feminists Assweasels Beauty Culture Books Busybodies Children Choosing Your Choice Double Standards Education Empowerfulment Fashion Fat Is A Feminist Issue Feminism Great Male Narcissists Ladylike Endeavors LGBTQ Marriage Masculinity Misogyny Motherhood Overshare Poetry Saturday Politics Race Racism Rants Relationships Religion Reproductive rights Sex Sexism Sexual violence So-Called Self-Improvement Stereotypes The Media Theory and Practice Things That Are Awesome Unexpected Consequences Violence against women and girls Women's Health Women's Work Work Administrative Professionals Day (2)
Anonymous Prosecutor (4)
Culcha Vulcha (54)
Discussion Time (9)
Feminist Food for Thought (55)
Friday Fun Thread (95)
Guest Post (49)
Harpy Book Club (64)
Harpy Cinematical Society (19)
Harpy Droppings (2)
Harpy Hall of Fame (27)
Harpy Periodical (3)
Harpy Seminar (29)
Harpy Shout-out (63)
Harpy Televisual Society (4)
Heard (7)
Help Me Harpies! (20)
Honorary Harpies (18)
Housekeeping (37)
International Museum of Women (1)
Language Matters (25)
Let's Talk Images (5)
Linkaround (27)
LOL (5)
Morning Snark (49)
Poetry Saturdays (6)
Reader Request (17)
Retro Pleasures (13)
Solo Flying (66)
Thoughts (1212)
Thursday Night Trivia (11)
Wednesday Whiplash (1)
You Have Got To Be Fucking Kidding Me (139)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.

Blogroll

  • A Truly Elegant Mess
  • Bitch
  • Bookslut
  • Deeply Problematic
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • F Bomb
  • Feminist Law Professors
  • Feminist Philosophers
  • Feministe
  • Feministing
  • Fugitivus
  • FWD/Forward
  • Geek Feminism
  • gudbuy t'jane
  • Hoyden About Town
  • Hysteria!
  • I Blame the Patriarchy
  • Jezebel
  • Kate Harding’s Shapely Prose
  • Katha Pollitt
  • Like a Whisper
  • Maud Newton
  • Pandagon
  • Racialicious
  • Rage Against the Man-chine
  • Salon’s Broadsheet
  • Shakesville
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Angry Black Woman
  • The Crunk Feminist Collective
  • The Curvature
  • The F Word
  • The Feminist Agenda
  • The Feminist Texican
  • Tiger Beatdown
  • Womanist Musings

Archives

  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

Search

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN
  • WordPress

google

google

.

Copyright © 2013. Creative Commons License
The Pursuit of Harpyness is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes

The harpy art you see in our banner above is by Ursula Dodge. Visit her etsy store!