<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One For Your Summer Reading List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2009/07/09/one-for-your-summer-reading-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/07/09/one-for-your-summer-reading-list/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ophelia Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/07/09/one-for-your-summer-reading-list/comment-page-1/#comment-11426</link>
		<dc:creator>Ophelia Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=8492#comment-11426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi - I hope you like it!

The bit about feminists - note that the blurb includes the word &#039;many.&#039; We certainly don&#039;t think or say that all feminists have been largely silent (we haven&#039;t, for a start!) - more that it&#039;s surprising and worrying that any have.

The Sholto Byrnes review is (cough) not the most accurate I&#039;ve ever seen. I&#039;m glad to see it made at least one person only more keen to read the book! Serves him right. mutter mutter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; I hope you like it!</p>
<p>The bit about feminists &#8211; note that the blurb includes the word &#8216;many.&#8217; We certainly don&#8217;t think or say that all feminists have been largely silent (we haven&#8217;t, for a start!) &#8211; more that it&#8217;s surprising and worrying that any have.</p>
<p>The Sholto Byrnes review is (cough) not the most accurate I&#8217;ve ever seen. I&#8217;m glad to see it made at least one person only more keen to read the book! Serves him right. mutter mutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/07/09/one-for-your-summer-reading-list/comment-page-1/#comment-11297</link>
		<dc:creator>rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=8492#comment-11297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ps I just finished reading &quot;The Future of an Illusion&quot; by Freud, which is related. (Guess what the illusion is.)

Freud briefly asks (in 1927) whether women have any lesser intelligence than men. He answers &quot;I doubt it&quot;. (Yeah I agree that&#039;s kinda weak...) but he says that if it&#039;s true at all it&#039;s through conditioning only:

&lt;i&gt;women labor under the harshness of an early prohibition against turning their thoughts to what would most have interested them-namely the problems of sexual life.&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps I just finished reading &#8220;The Future of an Illusion&#8221; by Freud, which is related. (Guess what the illusion is.)</p>
<p>Freud briefly asks (in 1927) whether women have any lesser intelligence than men. He answers &#8220;I doubt it&#8221;. (Yeah I agree that&#8217;s kinda weak&#8230;) but he says that if it&#8217;s true at all it&#8217;s through conditioning only:</p>
<p><i>women labor under the harshness of an early prohibition against turning their thoughts to what would most have interested them-namely the problems of sexual life.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahMC</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/07/09/one-for-your-summer-reading-list/comment-page-1/#comment-11279</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=8492#comment-11279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would really like for you to do a book review on this!  I love this topic, as a feminist and a former evangelican Christian - turned atheist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would really like for you to do a book review on this!  I love this topic, as a feminist and a former evangelican Christian &#8211; turned atheist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/07/09/one-for-your-summer-reading-list/comment-page-1/#comment-11272</link>
		<dc:creator>rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=8492#comment-11272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be great for you to follow up here! I&#039;ll look for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great for you to follow up here! I&#8217;ll look for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImTheMarigold</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/07/09/one-for-your-summer-reading-list/comment-page-1/#comment-11267</link>
		<dc:creator>ImTheMarigold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=8492#comment-11267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the recommendation.  I read Byrnes&#039; review and several comments that followed.  All it did was make me want to read the book that much more, and I am in agreement with commentors aatishb and parrhesia_77.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the recommendation.  I read Byrnes&#8217; review and several comments that followed.  All it did was make me want to read the book that much more, and I am in agreement with commentors aatishb and parrhesia_77.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
