Dear dudes:
On Friday night I happened to walk by a poster for Zooey Deschanel’s newest movie, 500 Days of Summer, and my eyes did a 360 degree roll in my head. It’s about the transience of modern love! Her character’s name is Summer, get it?!?!
My mind immediately filled with a vision of roughly a hundred boys/men I have known who have confessed their “secret” devotion to Zooey. They were lined up outside their nearest independently-run theatre, the floor grimy enough to indicate the extreme dedication to the craft of filmmaking, and staring up adoringly at a too-close screen to capture a moment of Zooey’s undeniable quirky wonderfulness.
It makes me want to throw up.
Now, my issue is not really with Ms. Deschanel herself. I like the She & Him album. A lot. I listen to it at least once a week, particularly when it’s sunny and I am in the presence of trees and I am wearing a pretty skirt, because it seems designed to be the soundtrack for that kind of soft-focus, indie hipster existence to which I occasionally aspire. (I am much too graceless to achieve it, but a girl can dream.)
No, my issue isn’t with Zooey herself. It’s with you guys. My issue is that I know you will tell me this is a “great” movie. I know that when I point out that Zooey always plays some version of “Summer,” and trust me, I don’t even have to see the movie to know who that character is, you will sort of agree and say, “But it’s a good character.” Then your eyes will dreamily wander over my shoulder as you dream of the inevitable encounter.
This is made all the more offensive, dudes, by the fact that I know you consider yourselves a cut above your average frat boy. No silicone for you dudes, no bottle blondes or string bikinis, but you like what you often refer to as “quirk.” By “quirk” you appear to mean that you’d like a girl not to act passively, to have a little personality, as they say. But what you’d like as much as that is for it to be an act, because fundamentally, quirk doesn’t threaten you. It doesn’t demand that you be anything different than what you are. It makes for cute outfits and the occasional crazy eye makeup, sure, but none of these require that you treat a woman like anything more than an empty vessel.
Because that’s what “Zooey Deschanel, indie princess” really is, you know. An empty vessel. She’s the girl that all the hipster guys of the universe have poured their dreams into. She’s not really a person so much as a cipher that you dudes worship, in the same, boring, empty way that men worship the much more “conventional” hotties.
So the next time you’re updating that Nerve.com profile and citing Zooey as your dream girl, keep in mind that you aren’t fooling us. We know what you want, and we know that no woman on earth is actually that unchallenging. Enjoy singledom.
Kisses,
PilgrimSoul













I imagine its a year and a half to late… but I’d like to try and defend the poor fans of hers like myself… as we seem not to have any representation here.
) adorable moreso then the emotionally unstable aspect. Also all of them are endearing in their awkwardness and most of the time fearlessness, and for me in life I kinda prefer a girl that isn’t trying to be prefect, but rather is happy just being. On another note, any girl I’ve ever spent a decent amount of time with professes to enjoy thrill and spontaneity, but when it really comes down to it they dont like surprises and change just like everyone else. So what wrong with our fantasies of a girl that actually wants to do things
. Plus the first movie I saw her in she sang… nothing makes a girl/women more beautiful then sharing her voice…
I dont know about your particular guy, but for me I find the spontanious charactor she plays (I havent seen a movie where she played a non-spontanious charactor
PS I had to look up Manic Pixie Dream Girl on wikipedia, and I imagine I’m fond of the entire archeotype… though I could do without the manic if it still had the implusiveness.
Loves to all you ladies.
Chris
Jenny was the original Zooey, had to be said.
While I agree with you pragmatically, your argument has a fundamental flaw-you’re directly stating that an individual shouldn’t pursue the romance they desire. It is natural to be attracted to that which does not threaten (i.e., provides comfort), and these individuals are pursuing the square whole for their square peg. Let them.
Choose your own adventure.
Right on, sister. I agree whole-heartedly. Nothing quirky about her, to be honest. Mediocre at best. but dudes wanna bang her. dudes wanna bang a lot of women. Dudes are dumb. And now this new sitcom? GEEEEEEEEZUS. spare me. really. just another pop star. inane pop star.
I just think she’s pretty.