logo

search

  • Home
  • About the Harpies
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
delete
bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

What? Why????

Posted by SarahMC in Thoughts, Abstinence-only, Children, Health, Parenting, Sex on Sep 8, 2009, 1:00pm | 22 comments

Thinking of talking to your kids about sex but too scared to say “penis” or “vagina?” Nervous as you may be, fret not. You don’t have to talk about the parts. That’s what Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services wants you to know. Check out this ridiculous, shameful commercial, which I’ve seen a bunch of times in the past few days (via Amplify Your Voice):

“Just tell me you want me to wait,” concludes the little girl narrating the PSA.

“Wait for what?” is the obvious question, since mom and dad won’t be talking about any “parts.” What an irresponsible message to send America’s families: you have no obligation to prepare your children for sex, just tell them not to do it (whatever “it” is). The 4parents government website has tips for talking to teens about sex and a page about the importance of marriage. If their “benefits of marriage” list is any indication, they seem to have forgotten that correlation does not equal causation. There is also a page about teaching kids how to say “no” (to sex). I could not find anything about teaching kids not to pressure, coerce or force others into sexual activity. Same as it ever was…

I don’t know whether the administration really endorses this message or is just using what remains of abstinence-only funds. Either way, something stinks.

22 Responses to “What? Why????”

  1. bluebears says:
    September 8, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    omg. I HATE this ad. HATE! I had no idea this was endorsed by the administration. I assumed it was paid for by some pro-abstinence org. Ugh. Gross.

  2. BeckySharper says:
    September 8, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Oh for the fuck of shit.

    YES, YOU DO HAVE TO TALK ABOUT THE PARTS! IT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE UNLESS YOU TALK ABOUT THE GODDAMN PARTS!

    It bears repeating that the societies with the lowest rates of teen pregnancy and STI transmission are the countries that have comprehensive sex ed where they OMG TALK ABOUT THE PARTS! Any evidence-based study of sex ed programs will show this in big, bold factual numbers that even an idiot–or a Republican–can understand.

  3. TVille says:
    September 8, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    Why, oh whhhhhyyyyy must we be “embarrassed” to talk to our kids about sex??? Doesn’t this just perpetuate the idea that sex is shameful and shouldn’t be talked about?

    If we can’t talk to our kids about sex, how can we ever expect them to talk to us about sex?

    Fer fuck’s sake.

  4. mischiefmanager says:
    September 8, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    How old is this ad? I wonder if this had anything to do that that anti Obama hired. Which department is the Faith-Based Initiatives in?

    Really, there are 2 talks, or one talk with 2 topics. One is the body parts one and the other is the morality one. The ad gets the general idea of the latter one right, but there’s no avoiding the former if you want to do it right. And acting like the names and functions of body parts is squicky is a hell of a message to send to your adolescent. Can we at least pretend to be grownups once in a while?

    There is no reason at all to drag marriage into this. Obama, I’m ashamed for you.

  5. J.D.Regent says:
    September 8, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    Imparting this vague sense of secrecy, shame, tension and fear around sex without any actual education or options has worked so well at keeping sexually mature/maturing humans from sex for the past millenia! Keep it up, America!

  6. PhDork says:
    September 8, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    Good dog, if your 9 year old doesn’t know the names of her “parts,” you’ve already screwed it up royally.

    “See, Betsy, someday a boy will want to put his wingwang in your shamecave, but that is wrong and dirty and horrible and you can get diseases and die. Also it makes babies.”

  7. vegkitty says:
    September 8, 2009 at 11:48 pm

    Every time I see this commercial I wonder… what is the little girl whose parents don’t tell her about the “parts” going to do when she wakes up bleeding out of her vagina one day?

  8. orlando says:
    September 9, 2009 at 1:56 am

    This was put out by the Onion. Has to be. Yes? Yes?

  9. betterfishtofry says:
    September 9, 2009 at 10:33 am

    This reminds me of the sex talk I had with my parents when I was 8. I walked in on them one morning and they were as they explained to me “loving each other” and then proceeded to give me the most.confusing.talk.ever. I did not realize until I was 15 and had a boyfriend that there were things between kissing and sex. I thought you kissed, then you had sex, then you had a baby. Yes my parents are uber Catholics…and yes, I read copious amounts of romance novels to try to the fill the void, but was just left further confused by what a “throbbing monolith” was. These kids are DOOMED!

  10. Marie says:
    September 9, 2009 at 11:05 am

    These commercials make me so angry!”You don’t even have to talk about the parts”??? Why are we encouraging parents as well as children to find this awkward and disgusting? I don’t think that’s teaching anyone to respect their body or sexuality. I remember reading something back in my teenage years, when I wanted to know more about all that stuff, but my parents got too flustered at the mere hint of the subject on tv, that “it’s ok if you feel guilty after your first time- that’s normal” WHAT? no it’s not normal, or healthy- we should not be conditioning young people to think they are dirty for doing something that is completely natural. Making sex taboo is hurting people so much more than -gasp- premarital sex ever could.

  11. Megan says:
    September 9, 2009 at 6:08 pm

    I was wondering when someone was going to talk about that commercial. I’ve been seeing it for a while, and it pisses me off every time.

  12. Maire says:
    September 9, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    “You don’t have to talk about the parts. You don’t have to be explicit.” WHAT? Those two sentences, one after another.

    Using the proper anatomical names for your body parts in NOT EXPLICIT. When your OB/GYN says “OK, and now to palpate your ovaries, I’m going to put two fingers into your vagina.” Do you stop your doctor and say “I’m sorry, you’re being explicit. From now on, refer to it as my shamecave.”???

    Hell, handbasket, etc.

  13. x. trapnel says:
    September 9, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    “Shamecave” is absolutely hilarious. Wow.

  14. Angela says:
    September 9, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    I’m in Canada and I saw this on TV (American channel I guess) and went off about it. My little sister couldn’t understand what was wrong with it. Shes 14. That made me even sadder.

  15. BeBe says:
    September 9, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    How sad is it that some people can’t use the proper words with their kids. My son talks endlessly about his penis and his “tech-i-sells” (he’s three) and his sisters know all the proper names for their parts too.

    The eldest quite frequently asks questions that could be considered “explicit,” but what of it? If she can’t get her questions answered by her mother, who is going to answer them?

    By the way, I curate a collection of stories related to sex-ed called Beyond the Birds and the Bees. Feel free to check it out or submit your own story.

  16. Emily says:
    September 9, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    That commercial sucks. A lot. But the 4Parents website is annoying me about the same amount. It’s basically pushing the “wait until you’re married talk,” which is NOT the same as the “wait until you’re ready” talk.

    It basically ignores the fact that a lot of teenagers and young adults actually want to have sex. Not all of them, and it may still be the wrong or irresponsible choice (depending on individual situation). But once they’re over the age of consent it’s their choice.

    The “how to say no / wait for marriage” talk it’s addressing the whole “when you’re ready to say yes” side of the issue.

  17. ZKzk says:
    September 9, 2009 at 9:08 pm

    As a peer educator, I take serious issue with the “don’t talk about the parts” aproach. Gee, could you vague that up for me? This kind of vague conversation does kids and teens NO GOOD and is the sheltering kind of message that screams,”I’m sorry, honey, I don’t trust you to make decsions, so I’m going to censor the information you, my child, recieve.” I am very dissapointed to hear that this ad has the backing of an administration that, as a member of the comprehensive sex education movement, I hoped would do a lot of good for my cause. And on a personal note, the last thing I know most teens want to hear from their parents is “wait to have sex” its really condescending.

  18. sarsar says:
    September 10, 2009 at 12:33 am

    This commercial ticks me off everytime I see it. But it’s now much better here in the southern/ midwestern area- we’re taught to “be pure” for our future spouses, and anatomy is gone over for about one day of an eight day course, the rest of it being jam-packed with videos and scare tactics. No answers about sex itself, just the “just wait” talk. It’s this kind of crap that gives Texas the number one spot for teen pregnancy (Go Republicans! not).

  19. livinginthefridge says:
    September 10, 2009 at 10:19 am

    Ugh, truly a sad commentary on our culture’s attitudes towards sex. It’s a shame we’re not seeing more progressive messages coming out of the Obama government. Still the same-ol anti-drug anti-sex TV ads as in the Bush era…

    Misinformation FTL.

  20. Patrisha says:
    September 10, 2009 at 10:44 am

    @vegkitty That girl will cry for days thinking she has some horrible disease. This is how I reacted when this happened to me. Another example of how my Irish Catholic mother prepared me for menses. We were passing a drug store when she said out of the blue and with no apparent connection to anything, “Well, I suppose that you will be costing me more money soon…” I was totally bewildered and it was literally years before I connected it with buying sanitary pads…

  21. Coruscation says:
    September 12, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    Who authorized them to teach abstinence from thinking ?

  22. Sissy Panty Buns says:
    September 12, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    I don’t want to appear like I’m plugging a book necessarily, but I ran across this one which deals with the subject of abstinance while viewing the blog over at Feministing. It’s entitled ‘the purity myth – How America’s Obsession with Virginity is Hurting Young Women’ by Jessica Valenti http://jessicavalenti.com/?page_id=38 . Jessica Valenti is the Executive Editor at Feministing http://www.feministing.com I was wondering whether you might have read it or be familiar with her work.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

 

random posts

Harpy Book Club, November Edition...
“Sexting” is Not to Blame For SexISM...
Poetry Saturdays: Grace Paley...

recent comments

  • Emz: I LOVE wearing thongs! I prefer a thicker waistband (think V...
  • Martin Owens: It appears to be at it's core a complaint about the general ...
  • Matthew: I can offer one small defense of the original poster. If you...
  • Rebecca: I am a woman and I love wearing heels. The pain of them is b...
  • Jason: I agree for the most part, but the point at which I take iss...
  • Mr. Nice Guy: "Genuinely nice guys have nothing to worry about. Genuinely ...

Tags

Abortion Activism Anger Anti-feminists Assweasels Beauty Culture Books Busybodies Children Choosing Your Choice Double Standards Education Empowerfulment Fashion Fat Is A Feminist Issue Feminism Great Male Narcissists Ladylike Endeavors LGBTQ Marriage Masculinity Misogyny Motherhood Overshare Poetry Saturday Politics Race Racism Rants Relationships Religion Reproductive rights Sex Sexism Sexual violence So-Called Self-Improvement Stereotypes The Media Theory and Practice Things That Are Awesome Unexpected Consequences Violence against women and girls Women's Health Women's Work Work Administrative Professionals Day (2)
Anonymous Prosecutor (4)
Culcha Vulcha (54)
Discussion Time (9)
Feminist Food for Thought (55)
Friday Fun Thread (95)
Guest Post (49)
Harpy Book Club (64)
Harpy Cinematical Society (19)
Harpy Droppings (2)
Harpy Hall of Fame (27)
Harpy Periodical (3)
Harpy Seminar (29)
Harpy Shout-out (63)
Harpy Televisual Society (4)
Heard (7)
Help Me Harpies! (20)
Honorary Harpies (18)
Housekeeping (37)
International Museum of Women (1)
Language Matters (25)
Let's Talk Images (5)
Linkaround (27)
LOL (5)
Morning Snark (49)
Poetry Saturdays (6)
Reader Request (17)
Retro Pleasures (13)
Solo Flying (66)
Thoughts (1212)
Thursday Night Trivia (11)
Wednesday Whiplash (1)
You Have Got To Be Fucking Kidding Me (139)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.

Blogroll

  • A Truly Elegant Mess
  • Bitch
  • Bookslut
  • Deeply Problematic
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • F Bomb
  • Feminist Law Professors
  • Feminist Philosophers
  • Feministe
  • Feministing
  • Fugitivus
  • FWD/Forward
  • Geek Feminism
  • gudbuy t'jane
  • Hoyden About Town
  • Hysteria!
  • I Blame the Patriarchy
  • Jezebel
  • Kate Harding’s Shapely Prose
  • Katha Pollitt
  • Like a Whisper
  • Maud Newton
  • Pandagon
  • Racialicious
  • Rage Against the Man-chine
  • Salon’s Broadsheet
  • Shakesville
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Angry Black Woman
  • The Crunk Feminist Collective
  • The Curvature
  • The F Word
  • The Feminist Agenda
  • The Feminist Texican
  • Tiger Beatdown
  • Womanist Musings

Archives

  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

Search

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN
  • WordPress

google

google

.

Copyright © 2013. Creative Commons License
The Pursuit of Harpyness is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes

The harpy art you see in our banner above is by Ursula Dodge. Visit her etsy store!