logo

search

  • Home
  • About the Harpies
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
delete
bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Harpy Cinematical Society: Whip It!

Posted by Pilgrim Soul in Harpy Cinematical Society, Thoughts on Oct 15, 2009, 12:00pm | 6 comments

This is the fifth installment of a feature we call “Harpy Cinematical Society,” in which we watch a movie (new or old) en masse and then replicate for you our subsequent discussions about it.

The subject of today’s discussion is Whip It!, directed by Drew Barrymore and starring Ellen Page. Bored with her life in Bodeen, Texas, Bliss (Page) secretly tries out for a roller derby league in Austin and becomes her team’s star skater. She works hard to succeed, experiences her first love, bonds with her teammates, fights with her mom and decides to pursue her dreams in Austin.

PilgrimSoul: I enjoyed myself, but I kept watching this movie thinking, “Okay, good, but are you gonna push that a little further – okay, no… Awesome, please let these friends get more screentime – oh, there’s another dude…”  In other words – it was good, but I thought that the raw materials of this thing – the subject matter, the actors – would have made for a much better Bechdel-test-passing movie than what Drew Barrymore got out of them.

SarahMC: I really enjoyed myself, but I see what you mean. For instance, I wondered why the people in charge at the league were men. But they were cool guys so I let it slide. I thought Barrymore did a good enough job; I didn’t find the direction distracting. I mostly appreciated that it was a female-focused story that didn’t revolve around men, marriage or babies. They girl doesn’t even get the boy (thank dog, because what a hipster douche)!

PilgrimSoul: Well, she doesn’t get the boy – in fact she rejects him – but she “gives him everything” (yikes), and her reasons for rejecting him are not presented so elegantly that it’s a clear cut case of, “you’re a hipster douche.”  There’s some mumbling about not wanting to be “that girl,” but in general I felt like the movie had very little conception of what “that girl” was.  Maybe a pageant girl, I don’t know, but I felt like Bliss’s question at the outset of the movie, when she was called “alternative” by some local bully and she asks, “Alternative to what?” was never really answered, and so it felt like we were just supposed to understand what she was being liberated from.  Which, in the case of you and I watching that movie, we have some ideas, but I thought to myself that a teenage girl watching this movie, in this age of Taylor Swift and Miley Cyrus, I’m not sure she would have found it as easy as that.

SarahMC: “That girl” who gets used by a two-timing boyfriend? I was taken aback by how quickly she threw him to the curb, when she had no proof he was cheating on her. The dumping was handled sloppily but like most of the movie’s hiccups I just went with it and focused more on Bliss’ main journey. A young woman finds her “bliss” (was that intentional?) competing in an activity she loves. She rebels against conformity and the role her mother and her community have prepared for her. There were definitely feminist undertones, even if they weren’t explicit. And even though Bliss’ mother was an obstacle, the conflict between them is handled tenderly. In fact I thought her mother was one of the more complex characters.

PilgrimSoul: Yeah, and I thought it was almost entirely due to Marcia Gay Harden being a strong enough actress to handle what I think was some uneven direction.  The mom is written as pretty shrill and unforgiving, but she gave it a softer edge rather than going for straight satire.

Funnily enough I felt like Ellen Page fared less well.   I mean, I still loved her, but Bliss talks sometimes in a babyesque, stoner-dreamy voice, and then other times she’s as sharp and sarcastic as Juno.  I thought this was particularly apparent in the pool-sex scene, where Page was constantly clutching knees to her chest and twisting away from the camera, as though she were uncomfortable – and that didn’t fit with the fact that diving into the pool was presented as Bliss’s idea.  That scene was well shot, but sort of unnecessary.

SarahMC: It was sort of nonsensical. I think the song hypnotized me (“Your Arms Around Me” by Jens Lekman) and convinced me that it was intensely sexy at the time.
Page did sound like she was whispering a lot of the time. Maybe that was her way of conveying nervousness around the popular kids or her discomfort at the beauty pageants. Her demeanor shifted when she wasn’t truly being herself. How adorable is Alia Shawkat? I liked that her character was bookish and academically motivated and sexual and fun-loving. I wish there were more multi-dimensional female characters in the movies.

PilgrimSoul: Shawkat was adorable, but I was pissed that they had her call herself fat and hook up inexplicably with the guy at the diner.  Multi-dimensional female characters are the bomb; I’m just not sure this was more than seeing some actresses have fun.  Which in and of itself might redeem the whole thing.

6 Responses to “Harpy Cinematical Society: Whip It!”

  1. ImTheMarigold says:
    October 15, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    Did anyone watch the TV show Rollergirls that was on A&E a few years ago? It was 13 episodes long and followed the lives of women on the Austin Rollerderby circuit. It was an AWESOME show, you can get it on Netflix. Anyways, to get to my point, if anyone has seen the show and this movie, did they use any real Austin rollergirls in it? I’d love to know!

  2. beatrice2000 says:
    October 15, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    I really liked the film, but was more interested in the lives of the roller girls than Bliss, she seemed too boring by comparison. I liked that the hipster guy turned out to be a douche, I was figuring in my head that guys who look/act like that get lots of ladies, and affect a cute shyness to their advantage.

    Alia Shawkat was an adorable and charming presence, I kept paying more attention to her in her scenes. I also thought Daniel Stern looked like my uncle, who is an actor, and kept picturing my uncle in the role.

    It had a 90′s riot grrl feel to it, and seemed a little dated, but I found it sweet and funny and enjoyable.

  3. vmt says:
    October 15, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    Personally, I loved it. The roller derby bits were so fun, but the subplots: of friendship, the romance, the parents, were where the real meat of the narrative lay.

    The friendship between Bliss and Pash- so realistically written (and if you read their interviews, Page and Shawkat are real-life buds too).
    I too liked the fact that Bliss doesn’t get the guy, intentionally. And the way their whole ” thing “was spot on: oozeingly sweet and ultimately un-fulfilling.

    And the parents: wow, best part. Even the dad was written in an interesting way- made out to be the bumbling beer drinker, wishing he had sons, who comes to not only value Bliss’ hobby (as a real sport!) but encourage her to follow her dreams.

    I was disappointed that it didn’t do better in theaters. :(

  4. AmandaS says:
    October 15, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    I’m trying out for derby this year, so I have an obvious bias toward anything derby-related, but I did enjoy this movie very much. It had a handful of glaring problems, and was pretty much dipped in white, hetero, thin privilege, but it had quite a few triumphs in my opinion.

    I loved Bliss’ relationships with her parents and Pash, they seemed very complex and real to me. I loved the empowerment of young women, and the idea that women can be tough and beautiful at the same time. I loved that there were deaf characters who weren’t played for laughs, but were two of the scariest roller girls.

    As for men being in charge, I know that at least locally, almost all of our refs and announcers are men. I suspect that, as in my brother’s case, since they can’t play derby, they take any role they can in order to participate in some way, and women who are interested pass up these roles in order to actually play.

    As for whether any of the Austin Rollergirls are in the movie, I’m not sure, but the Manson Sisters are LA Derby Dolls.

  5. SarahMC says:
    October 15, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    vmt, I forgot to mention how pleased I was with the dad’s transformation. It made me very happy.

    Good luck AmandaS!

    A glimpse into the lives of the other derby girls would definitely be cool, beatrice.

    I am pretty bummed out it didn’t do well in theaters. A clear message to Hollywood that “bromedies” and more SATC movies are where it’s at.

  6. Rachel_in_WY says:
    October 16, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    On the topic of male involvement, it might vary according to location. The roller derby team here was organized and started almost exclusively by women, who all kick ass, although there are several men involved now. Also, go Naughty Pines!

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

 

random posts

O Mother Where Art Thou? (Part Two)...
Conversations About the Patriarchy: Part 2...
History Repeats Itself...

recent comments

  • Matthew: I can offer one small defense of the original poster. If you...
  • Rebecca: I am a woman and I love wearing heels. The pain of them is b...
  • Jason: I agree for the most part, but the point at which I take iss...
  • Mr. Nice Guy: "Genuinely nice guys have nothing to worry about. Genuinely ...
  • Jill: Thank you for the truth. Now i know im doing the right thing...
  • Nikki: Thank you so much for this. Im going to have a medical ab do...

Tags

Abortion Activism Anger Anti-feminists Assweasels Beauty Culture Books Busybodies Children Choosing Your Choice Double Standards Education Empowerfulment Fashion Fat Is A Feminist Issue Feminism Great Male Narcissists Ladylike Endeavors LGBTQ Marriage Masculinity Misogyny Motherhood Overshare Poetry Saturday Politics Race Racism Rants Relationships Religion Reproductive rights Sex Sexism Sexual violence So-Called Self-Improvement Stereotypes The Media Theory and Practice Things That Are Awesome Unexpected Consequences Violence against women and girls Women's Health Women's Work Work Administrative Professionals Day (2)
Anonymous Prosecutor (4)
Culcha Vulcha (54)
Discussion Time (9)
Feminist Food for Thought (55)
Friday Fun Thread (95)
Guest Post (49)
Harpy Book Club (64)
Harpy Cinematical Society (19)
Harpy Droppings (2)
Harpy Hall of Fame (27)
Harpy Periodical (3)
Harpy Seminar (29)
Harpy Shout-out (63)
Harpy Televisual Society (4)
Heard (7)
Help Me Harpies! (20)
Honorary Harpies (18)
Housekeeping (37)
International Museum of Women (1)
Language Matters (25)
Let's Talk Images (5)
Linkaround (27)
LOL (5)
Morning Snark (49)
Poetry Saturdays (6)
Reader Request (17)
Retro Pleasures (13)
Solo Flying (66)
Thoughts (1212)
Thursday Night Trivia (11)
Wednesday Whiplash (1)
You Have Got To Be Fucking Kidding Me (139)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.

Blogroll

  • A Truly Elegant Mess
  • Bitch
  • Bookslut
  • Deeply Problematic
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • F Bomb
  • Feminist Law Professors
  • Feminist Philosophers
  • Feministe
  • Feministing
  • Fugitivus
  • FWD/Forward
  • Geek Feminism
  • gudbuy t'jane
  • Hoyden About Town
  • Hysteria!
  • I Blame the Patriarchy
  • Jezebel
  • Kate Harding’s Shapely Prose
  • Katha Pollitt
  • Like a Whisper
  • Maud Newton
  • Pandagon
  • Racialicious
  • Rage Against the Man-chine
  • Salon’s Broadsheet
  • Shakesville
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Angry Black Woman
  • The Crunk Feminist Collective
  • The Curvature
  • The F Word
  • The Feminist Agenda
  • The Feminist Texican
  • Tiger Beatdown
  • Womanist Musings

Archives

  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

Search

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN
  • WordPress

google

google

.

Copyright © 2013. Creative Commons License
The Pursuit of Harpyness is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes

The harpy art you see in our banner above is by Ursula Dodge. Visit her etsy store!