Comments on: Abortions for Me, but Not for Thee http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/13/abortions-for-me-but-not-for-thee/ As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet Fri, 17 May 2013 21:22:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: BeckySharper http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/13/abortions-for-me-but-not-for-thee/comment-page-1/#comment-18035 BeckySharper Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:55:29 +0000 http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11613#comment-18035 @mischiefmanager: I think they have a slush fund for those occasions.

]]> By: mischiefmanager http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/13/abortions-for-me-but-not-for-thee/comment-page-1/#comment-18032 mischiefmanager Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:32:32 +0000 http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11613#comment-18032 Now they’re going to have a big problem-who’s going to pay when married male RNC staffers get their girlfriends pregnant? That’s why that coverage was in there, right?

]]> By: J.D.Regent http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/13/abortions-for-me-but-not-for-thee/comment-page-1/#comment-18004 J.D.Regent Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:25:31 +0000 http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11613#comment-18004 that’s a good point. those folks are probably contract workers and don’t get benefits anyway though, knowing the way most workplaces go. it’s shit all around but i do think there is some poetic justice involved. somewhere.

]]> By: PhDork http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/13/abortions-for-me-but-not-for-thee/comment-page-1/#comment-17997 PhDork Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:16:05 +0000 http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11613#comment-17997 I don’t know, JD, I bet there are some admin and custodial workers who aren’t making squat (and who probably ain’t there for the politics), but at least they have health care. But in that rich people will always be able to get the abortions they need, the RNC is probably doin’ fine.

]]> By: TVille http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/13/abortions-for-me-but-not-for-thee/comment-page-1/#comment-17993 TVille Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:04:57 +0000 http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11613#comment-17993 Well, thank god he caught that oversight…18 years later. Can’t have Republican women getting abortions you know…makes the party look bad…

/snark

]]> By: J.D.Regent http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/13/abortions-for-me-but-not-for-thee/comment-page-1/#comment-17992 J.D.Regent Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:40:35 +0000 http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11613#comment-17992 unfortunately anyone who works at the RNC presumably makes enough $$ to pay for an abortion out of pocket anyway so it’s unlikely to hit them as hard as we would like it to.

]]> By: sarah.of.a.lesser.god http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/13/abortions-for-me-but-not-for-thee/comment-page-1/#comment-17990 sarah.of.a.lesser.god Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:38:55 +0000 http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11613#comment-17990 Hmm…

Michael Steele, who will never need an abortion of any kind . . . chickens with unplanned pregnancies coming home to roost

FYI, I now have an image of Michael Steele getting chickens pregnant, or a chicken getting Michael Steele pregnant.

]]> By: NefariousNewt http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/13/abortions-for-me-but-not-for-thee/comment-page-1/#comment-17988 NefariousNewt Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:29:39 +0000 http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11613#comment-17988 I wonder how many slutty whorebag tramps work for the RNC?

]]> By: bondwooley http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/13/abortions-for-me-but-not-for-thee/comment-page-1/#comment-17985 bondwooley Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:35:46 +0000 http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11613#comment-17985 Poor Michael Steele is scrambling and backtracking yet again. Good thing he’s got a crackerjack coach:

http://bit.ly/3ppyiu

(satire)

]]>