<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Not To Write History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaeRae25</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/comment-page-1/#comment-20420</link>
		<dc:creator>RaeRae25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=12635#comment-20420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SIX PAGES?! Really!? Ugh. I&#039;ve read Women In American History (I can&#039;t remember the authors&#039; names) and I learned so, so much. It&#039;s a great, easy read, but it stops in the 1970s. Are the books already mentioned in this thread more comprehensive/recent?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SIX PAGES?! Really!? Ugh. I&#8217;ve read Women In American History (I can&#8217;t remember the authors&#8217; names) and I learned so, so much. It&#8217;s a great, easy read, but it stops in the 1970s. Are the books already mentioned in this thread more comprehensive/recent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mischiefmanager</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/comment-page-1/#comment-20400</link>
		<dc:creator>mischiefmanager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=12635#comment-20400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Ronnie:  Word.  Also, women&#039;s history tends to be ghettoized (is that a word?) as &quot;social history&quot;, which isn&#039;t nearly as important as, say, the endless retellings of battles for the last 5000 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ronnie:  Word.  Also, women&#8217;s history tends to be ghettoized (is that a word?) as &#8220;social history&#8221;, which isn&#8217;t nearly as important as, say, the endless retellings of battles for the last 5000 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/comment-page-1/#comment-20399</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=12635#comment-20399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It makes one suspect all we know of human history is like all we know of the dinosaurs .. the tip of the iceberg only!  I wonder if more womens history isn&#039;t published because its only documented in letters (oft in private collections, see Abigail Adams) and even oral histories among tribes etc .. and the money hungry publishers (who pick the titles) wont justify the research that would be necessary?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes one suspect all we know of human history is like all we know of the dinosaurs .. the tip of the iceberg only!  I wonder if more womens history isn&#8217;t published because its only documented in letters (oft in private collections, see Abigail Adams) and even oral histories among tribes etc .. and the money hungry publishers (who pick the titles) wont justify the research that would be necessary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clickity Click &#171; Snarky&#39;s Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/comment-page-1/#comment-20393</link>
		<dc:creator>Clickity Click &#171; Snarky&#39;s Machine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=12635#comment-20393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] • The Pursuit of Harpyness on How Not To Write History [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] • The Pursuit of Harpyness on How Not To Write History [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah.of.a.lesser.god</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/comment-page-1/#comment-20392</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah.of.a.lesser.god</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=12635#comment-20392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Esme&lt;/b&gt;, you seriously rock, as I detest Columbus Day (especially since I&#039;m 1/4 Lakota Sioux).  Howard Zinn also rocks..  Zinn, along with the book &lt;b&gt;BeckySharper&lt;/b&gt; mentions, sounds like a perfect antidote to the book I refer to.

&lt;b&gt;Jha&lt;/b&gt;, you make a great point.  As they say, history is written by the victors, and the victors within the historical theory circles have -- until very, very recently -- been Euro/American Caucasian (and often Christian) men.  The inextricable linkage you cite is something that women frequently acknowledge, but the other 50% of the population has had to figure out independently, as they are often never taught that history is history, and it&#039;s humankind rather than mankind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Esme</b>, you seriously rock, as I detest Columbus Day (especially since I&#8217;m 1/4 Lakota Sioux).  Howard Zinn also rocks..  Zinn, along with the book <b>BeckySharper</b> mentions, sounds like a perfect antidote to the book I refer to.</p>
<p><b>Jha</b>, you make a great point.  As they say, history is written by the victors, and the victors within the historical theory circles have &#8212; until very, very recently &#8212; been Euro/American Caucasian (and often Christian) men.  The inextricable linkage you cite is something that women frequently acknowledge, but the other 50% of the population has had to figure out independently, as they are often never taught that history is history, and it&#8217;s humankind rather than mankind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esme</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/comment-page-1/#comment-20391</link>
		<dc:creator>Esme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=12635#comment-20391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, Howard Zinn rocks my socks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Howard Zinn rocks my socks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esme</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/comment-page-1/#comment-20390</link>
		<dc:creator>Esme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=12635#comment-20390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was quite a reader as a kid. Before I was inundated with textbooks celebrating the joys of white penis-ownership, I read anything I could get my hands on.

When I was 5, my parents had me take an IQ test, administered orally. The first question was &quot;Who discovered America.&quot; Apparently, the Native Americans was not the correct answer, nor the Vikings who reached American shores long before Christian colonizers, and I wound up faking an illness to go home, rather than give in to the guy administering the test&#039;s insistence that I say Columbus discovered America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was quite a reader as a kid. Before I was inundated with textbooks celebrating the joys of white penis-ownership, I read anything I could get my hands on.</p>
<p>When I was 5, my parents had me take an IQ test, administered orally. The first question was &#8220;Who discovered America.&#8221; Apparently, the Native Americans was not the correct answer, nor the Vikings who reached American shores long before Christian colonizers, and I wound up faking an illness to go home, rather than give in to the guy administering the test&#8217;s insistence that I say Columbus discovered America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeckySharper</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/comment-page-1/#comment-20389</link>
		<dc:creator>BeckySharper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=12635#comment-20389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[s.o.l.a.g., I&#039;m going to hook you up with my favorite history book, &lt;em&gt; Who Cooked The Last Supper?: A Women&#039;s History of the World &lt;/em&gt; by Rosalind Miles.  It&#039;ll cure you of that dudely history-induced nausea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s.o.l.a.g., I&#8217;m going to hook you up with my favorite history book, <em> Who Cooked The Last Supper?: A Women&#8217;s History of the World </em> by Rosalind Miles.  It&#8217;ll cure you of that dudely history-induced nausea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jha</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/comment-page-1/#comment-20388</link>
		<dc:creator>Jha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=12635#comment-20388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While reading Marilyn French&#039;s &lt;I&gt;From Eve to Dawn&lt;/I&gt;, I wondered at the number of male names mentioned - if this is a women&#039;s history, why do we need to mention men? Then I recalled that men were the other 50% of the world, and of course a women&#039;s history is inextricably linked to men&#039;s history. Not that we get this kind of concern from male historians, of course, but I found my thought patterns interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While reading Marilyn French&#8217;s <i>From Eve to Dawn</i>, I wondered at the number of male names mentioned &#8211; if this is a women&#8217;s history, why do we need to mention men? Then I recalled that men were the other 50% of the world, and of course a women&#8217;s history is inextricably linked to men&#8217;s history. Not that we get this kind of concern from male historians, of course, but I found my thought patterns interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention How Not To Write History - The Pursuit of Harpyness -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/01/20/how-not-to-write-history/comment-page-1/#comment-20387</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention How Not To Write History - The Pursuit of Harpyness -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=12635#comment-20387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Freelancing Job, Kylie Mason. Kylie Mason said: If it&#039;s a &#039;history of the world&#039;, where are the women and non-Europeans? From the Harpies&#039; blog: http://bit.ly/7R9Mmd [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Freelancing Job, Kylie Mason. Kylie Mason said: If it&#39;s a &#39;history of the world&#39;, where are the women and non-Europeans? From the Harpies&#39; blog: <a href="http://bit.ly/7R9Mmd" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7R9Mmd</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
