<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What We Learned from the SuperBowl Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 05:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Lesson in Equal Opportunity Objectification, with Becks - The Pursuit of Harpyness</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-82030</link>
		<dc:creator>A Lesson in Equal Opportunity Objectification, with Becks - The Pursuit of Harpyness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 03:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13156#comment-82030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Super Bowl advertising was not NEARLY as bad as in years past (the absolute low point was 2010, when we collectively blew our feminist gaskets over the super-abundance of misogynist advertising). Sure, there was a dumbass Teleflora ad [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Super Bowl advertising was not NEARLY as bad as in years past (the absolute low point was 2010, when we collectively blew our feminist gaskets over the super-abundance of misogynist advertising). Sure, there was a dumbass Teleflora ad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Ad I Hate &#171; Hysteria!</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-24556</link>
		<dc:creator>An Ad I Hate &#171; Hysteria!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13156#comment-24556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] can&#8217;t understand this commercial to save my life.  Because, as the Harpies put it during their wrap-up of the Superbowl 2010 ads, the point of ads like this is that &#8220;Men talk a lot more.  Men do more things.  Men are the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can&#8217;t understand this commercial to save my life.  Because, as the Harpies put it during their wrap-up of the Superbowl 2010 ads, the point of ads like this is that &#8220;Men talk a lot more.  Men do more things.  Men are the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irrsinn.net - Quasi-daily linkage</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-22877</link>
		<dc:creator>Irrsinn.net - Quasi-daily linkage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13156#comment-22877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] What We Learned from the SuperBowl Ads &#8211; The Pursuit of Harpyness &#8211; The good kind of snarky. &quot;Women and Doritos are of equal value, to be coveted by some men (skeevy would-be boyfriends) and protected by others (aw, cute little boys!), who are their rightful owners.&quot; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What We Learned from the SuperBowl Ads &#8211; The Pursuit of Harpyness &#8211; The good kind of snarky. &quot;Women and Doritos are of equal value, to be coveted by some men (skeevy would-be boyfriends) and protected by others (aw, cute little boys!), who are their rightful owners.&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting posts, weekend of 2/14/10 &#171; Feminists with Female Sexual Dysfunction</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-22024</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting posts, weekend of 2/14/10 &#171; Feminists with Female Sexual Dysfunction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13156#comment-22024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8211; an in-depth analysis of a shitty sexist ad. What We Learned from the SuperBowl Ads &#8211; I missed the SuperBowl completely, was totally uninterested. So I missed the commercials, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; an in-depth analysis of a shitty sexist ad. What We Learned from the SuperBowl Ads &#8211; I missed the SuperBowl completely, was totally uninterested. So I missed the commercials, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woman&#8217;s Last Stand - The Pursuit of Harpyness</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-21794</link>
		<dc:creator>Woman&#8217;s Last Stand - The Pursuit of Harpyness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13156#comment-21794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] your eyes and ears on this amazing spoof of the Dodge Charger SuperBowl commercial we hated.  I am having trouble embedding it here but I could not wait to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your eyes and ears on this amazing spoof of the Dodge Charger SuperBowl commercial we hated.  I am having trouble embedding it here but I could not wait to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queen_George</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-21690</link>
		<dc:creator>Queen_George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13156#comment-21690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am SUPER late to the party here, but I wanted to add one thing about the general trend of men portrayed as idiots in advertising:

I completely agree that the patriarchy hurts men too.  And that if I were a man, I would not want to be portrayed as a massive idiot in the general media.  However, I also think it&#039;s true that there are men out there who use this portrayal to their advantage.

Take for example the commercials featured in Sarah Haskin&#039;s Target Women: Doofy Husbands (http://current.com/items/90569059_sarah-haskins-in-target-women-doofy-husbands.htm).  In these ads, men are too incompetent to do housework/chores.  They have no basic life skills.  But ultimately, the fault in the ad still lies with the women.  After all, they should have KNOWN that their husbands were too stupid to do anything.  The man might be dumb, but the woman is DUMBER for letting him do anything in the first place.  (Note in particular the ad Haskins addresses about killing weeds.  The woman begins the ad by saying &quot;maybe it&#039;s my fault...&quot;.)  And this trope is just as true in real life.  There are men who will lay the responsibility for all decisions on wives/girlfriends/mothers so that there is someone to blame when the work doesn&#039;t get done.  

The same holds true for the Dodge Charger ad.  Flackette was right when she pointed out that a lot of those &quot;chores&quot; don&#039;t have anything to do with women.  But if a man can make it SEEM as though his wife/girlfriend is the witch who forces him to get to work on time, that&#039;s one less challenge of adulthood he has to accept responsibility for.  He&#039;s already established that it&#039;s his wife&#039;s job, so when he doesn&#039;t show up on time one day, it isn&#039;t really his fault.  She just wasn&#039;t enough of a nag to get him there.

My point, made shorter, is this: when you have privilege, the ability to be doofy (and blame someone else for said doofiness) is just another facet of that privilege.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am SUPER late to the party here, but I wanted to add one thing about the general trend of men portrayed as idiots in advertising:</p>
<p>I completely agree that the patriarchy hurts men too.  And that if I were a man, I would not want to be portrayed as a massive idiot in the general media.  However, I also think it&#8217;s true that there are men out there who use this portrayal to their advantage.</p>
<p>Take for example the commercials featured in Sarah Haskin&#8217;s Target Women: Doofy Husbands (<a href="http://current.com/items/90569059_sarah-haskins-in-target-women-doofy-husbands.htm" rel="nofollow">http://current.com/items/90569059_sarah-haskins-in-target-women-doofy-husbands.htm</a>).  In these ads, men are too incompetent to do housework/chores.  They have no basic life skills.  But ultimately, the fault in the ad still lies with the women.  After all, they should have KNOWN that their husbands were too stupid to do anything.  The man might be dumb, but the woman is DUMBER for letting him do anything in the first place.  (Note in particular the ad Haskins addresses about killing weeds.  The woman begins the ad by saying &#8220;maybe it&#8217;s my fault&#8230;&#8221;.)  And this trope is just as true in real life.  There are men who will lay the responsibility for all decisions on wives/girlfriends/mothers so that there is someone to blame when the work doesn&#8217;t get done.  </p>
<p>The same holds true for the Dodge Charger ad.  Flackette was right when she pointed out that a lot of those &#8220;chores&#8221; don&#8217;t have anything to do with women.  But if a man can make it SEEM as though his wife/girlfriend is the witch who forces him to get to work on time, that&#8217;s one less challenge of adulthood he has to accept responsibility for.  He&#8217;s already established that it&#8217;s his wife&#8217;s job, so when he doesn&#8217;t show up on time one day, it isn&#8217;t really his fault.  She just wasn&#8217;t enough of a nag to get him there.</p>
<p>My point, made shorter, is this: when you have privilege, the ability to be doofy (and blame someone else for said doofiness) is just another facet of that privilege.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wonton</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-21650</link>
		<dc:creator>wonton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13156#comment-21650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah MC - I love your post.  But we deserve respect just because.  We deserve respect just like anyone else does.  Somehow men have come to expect all these things that we do for them, and now that the 21st century has rolled around and we&#039;re finally asking them to do for themselves we are complete bitches.  Ridiculous....What we should do is less.  They can take care of their damn selves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah MC &#8211; I love your post.  But we deserve respect just because.  We deserve respect just like anyone else does.  Somehow men have come to expect all these things that we do for them, and now that the 21st century has rolled around and we&#8217;re finally asking them to do for themselves we are complete bitches.  Ridiculous&#8230;.What we should do is less.  They can take care of their damn selves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-21581</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13156#comment-21581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We missed a lot of the commercials because we kept having to pause the game (usually to take care of our son) and then DH would fast forward to catch up. The few that we did see included the bridgestone one where the &quot;hot wife&quot; is thrown out of the car. My husband&#039;s response, &quot;that is f**ked up&quot; (we also saw the dodge one and had a similar WTF moment). I&#039;m sure some of these commercials were a hit with some guys but I think a lot of them were so offensive that they did more harm than good to the brand even among men (I&#039;m assuming women were pretty uniformly offended).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We missed a lot of the commercials because we kept having to pause the game (usually to take care of our son) and then DH would fast forward to catch up. The few that we did see included the bridgestone one where the &#8220;hot wife&#8221; is thrown out of the car. My husband&#8217;s response, &#8220;that is f**ked up&#8221; (we also saw the dodge one and had a similar WTF moment). I&#8217;m sure some of these commercials were a hit with some guys but I think a lot of them were so offensive that they did more harm than good to the brand even among men (I&#8217;m assuming women were pretty uniformly offended).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt taron</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-21578</link>
		<dc:creator>matt taron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13156#comment-21578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i must admit to having been equally disgusted and confused by most of the ads you mention.  i do take one quick exception to what you said about women without their pants.  the one ad with everyone in their underwear in the office actually depicted regular-looking, non-model women in their regular cotton undies.  not that this wasn&#039;t hot, mind you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i must admit to having been equally disgusted and confused by most of the ads you mention.  i do take one quick exception to what you said about women without their pants.  the one ad with everyone in their underwear in the office actually depicted regular-looking, non-model women in their regular cotton undies.  not that this wasn&#8217;t hot, mind you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellacoker</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/02/08/what-we-learned-from-the-superbowl-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-21575</link>
		<dc:creator>bellacoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13156#comment-21575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Evolving:
Of course.  Advertising directed at women is incredibly insulting toward women, but advertising directed toward men insults EVERYONE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Evolving:<br />
Of course.  Advertising directed at women is incredibly insulting toward women, but advertising directed toward men insults EVERYONE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
