<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God Is Not A Segregationist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeckySharper</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/comment-page-1/#comment-23317</link>
		<dc:creator>BeckySharper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13755#comment-23317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shmuley Boteach is just a more media-friendly version of the same old Orthodox anti-woman bullshit. He totally skeeves me out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shmuley Boteach is just a more media-friendly version of the same old Orthodox anti-woman bullshit. He totally skeeves me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veggiewood</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/comment-page-1/#comment-23292</link>
		<dc:creator>veggiewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13755#comment-23292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[argh.  and don&#039;t even get me started on shmuley boteach&#039;s justification for separation in orthodox jewish churches.  it&#039;s to protect the unmarried wimminz from feeling badly about their unmarried state of course!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>argh.  and don&#8217;t even get me started on shmuley boteach&#8217;s justification for separation in orthodox jewish churches.  it&#8217;s to protect the unmarried wimminz from feeling badly about their unmarried state of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magpie_Seven</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/comment-page-1/#comment-23203</link>
		<dc:creator>Magpie_Seven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13755#comment-23203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@BeckySharper and MM: Thank you for the info about the divine feminine in Judaism! I clearly need to do some more detailed reading- I&#039;m English, and the area I&#039;m from has large Christian and Muslim communities but almost no Jewish presence at all, so when it comes to Judaism I am just not as informed as I should be. I&#039;ll be taking steps to rectify that, and thank you for not piling on when the ignorance was entirely my own fault.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BeckySharper and MM: Thank you for the info about the divine feminine in Judaism! I clearly need to do some more detailed reading- I&#8217;m English, and the area I&#8217;m from has large Christian and Muslim communities but almost no Jewish presence at all, so when it comes to Judaism I am just not as informed as I should be. I&#8217;ll be taking steps to rectify that, and thank you for not piling on when the ignorance was entirely my own fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/comment-page-1/#comment-23193</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13755#comment-23193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If someone needs physical separation in order to pray, he or she is welcome to remove themselves–not force everyone else to leave.

Exactly what I was thinking, Churches can provide &#039;quiet&#039; rooms, chapels etc . even airports have them.  And by all means, they should go to the mountain, not expect the rest of the town to!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone needs physical separation in order to pray, he or she is welcome to remove themselves–not force everyone else to leave.</p>
<p>Exactly what I was thinking, Churches can provide &#8216;quiet&#8217; rooms, chapels etc . even airports have them.  And by all means, they should go to the mountain, not expect the rest of the town to!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeckySharper</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/comment-page-1/#comment-23192</link>
		<dc:creator>BeckySharper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13755#comment-23192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Nadia: Ugh, it sucks that you have that sense of dread and anticipation when doing your daily reading. I&#039;m glad you liked how this post turned out.

I know more about Judaism and Christianity than I know about Islam, but from what I do know, the prophet Muhammad (pbuh)  was much more overtly woman-friendly and woman-empowering than the prophets of Judaism and Christianity. So what these women are doing is essentially demanding the rights that their religion promises them but which the Patriarchy of their culture has always prevented them from gaining. It&#039;s not a question of them being &quot;more like us&quot; at all. (Because honestly, I don&#039;t think Judaism or Christianity is necessarily the best theology or worldview out there...it just happens to be the one I was born into).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nadia: Ugh, it sucks that you have that sense of dread and anticipation when doing your daily reading. I&#8217;m glad you liked how this post turned out.</p>
<p>I know more about Judaism and Christianity than I know about Islam, but from what I do know, the prophet Muhammad (pbuh)  was much more overtly woman-friendly and woman-empowering than the prophets of Judaism and Christianity. So what these women are doing is essentially demanding the rights that their religion promises them but which the Patriarchy of their culture has always prevented them from gaining. It&#8217;s not a question of them being &#8220;more like us&#8221; at all. (Because honestly, I don&#8217;t think Judaism or Christianity is necessarily the best theology or worldview out there&#8230;it just happens to be the one I was born into).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desargues</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/comment-page-1/#comment-23184</link>
		<dc:creator>Desargues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13755#comment-23184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rodriguez: Point well taken. I do find interesting the various strategies of taming a system from within, as it were. But only as a sociological topic, as it were. I&#039;m just wondering about the long-term desirability of these approaches versus just moving beyond the whole religion shtick, if the objective is to liberate oppressed groups. Nationalism is also traditionally quite patriarchal. Making it more woman-friendly won&#039;t change much about the fact that it&#039;ll still be one of those &quot;you&#039;re either one of us or a stranger&quot; things. 

Maybe I&#039;m just foolishly assuming that this discussion is about religions in which their members actually believe in, not just matters of purely arbitrary choice. I very much like the color brown, but I&#039;d never dream of trying to persuade other people to like it, guide a portion of my life by it, or demand that my fondness for it be respected. It&#039;s just a thing I like, completely subjective and arbitrary. Were we talking about religion in that sense?

Becky: Sorry, I don&#039;t do god. I can&#039;t really see how it&#039;s different from astrology. A good day to you all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rodriguez: Point well taken. I do find interesting the various strategies of taming a system from within, as it were. But only as a sociological topic, as it were. I&#8217;m just wondering about the long-term desirability of these approaches versus just moving beyond the whole religion shtick, if the objective is to liberate oppressed groups. Nationalism is also traditionally quite patriarchal. Making it more woman-friendly won&#8217;t change much about the fact that it&#8217;ll still be one of those &#8220;you&#8217;re either one of us or a stranger&#8221; things. </p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just foolishly assuming that this discussion is about religions in which their members actually believe in, not just matters of purely arbitrary choice. I very much like the color brown, but I&#8217;d never dream of trying to persuade other people to like it, guide a portion of my life by it, or demand that my fondness for it be respected. It&#8217;s just a thing I like, completely subjective and arbitrary. Were we talking about religion in that sense?</p>
<p>Becky: Sorry, I don&#8217;t do god. I can&#8217;t really see how it&#8217;s different from astrology. A good day to you all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadia</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/comment-page-1/#comment-23179</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13755#comment-23179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh and I say all this as an atheist. Simple lack of belief does not immediately free anyone from their religious and cultural identities or situations except those already socially positioned to move beyond them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and I say all this as an atheist. Simple lack of belief does not immediately free anyone from their religious and cultural identities or situations except those already socially positioned to move beyond them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadia</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/comment-page-1/#comment-23177</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13755#comment-23177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s probably a sign of just how demonized Muslims have become in mainstream media that, when I got to the end of your post without encountering any vitriol or snark, I was amazed. And relieved. And grateful. 

Yes there are actual Muslim feminists and yes Islam has a whole slew of things in common with Judaism and Christianity because it is built on them. And yes Islam was once about giving women rights and protecting them as human beings. But these are things you seldom come across out here in the great wilderness of the intertubes. There is much wrong with religion in general - or the various interpretations of the various religions - but it is nice to see someone address the issues that occur within a community without suggesting that their issues would all resolve themselves if they were just More Like Us (for various values of &#039;Us&#039;), and actually engaging with the issue at hand (in good faith even :P). 

As to the actual content of the post, I think it&#039;s awesome not only that these women are trying to change this structure from within, but that they are getting attention and support for doing so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably a sign of just how demonized Muslims have become in mainstream media that, when I got to the end of your post without encountering any vitriol or snark, I was amazed. And relieved. And grateful. </p>
<p>Yes there are actual Muslim feminists and yes Islam has a whole slew of things in common with Judaism and Christianity because it is built on them. And yes Islam was once about giving women rights and protecting them as human beings. But these are things you seldom come across out here in the great wilderness of the intertubes. There is much wrong with religion in general &#8211; or the various interpretations of the various religions &#8211; but it is nice to see someone address the issues that occur within a community without suggesting that their issues would all resolve themselves if they were just More Like Us (for various values of &#8216;Us&#8217;), and actually engaging with the issue at hand (in good faith even <img src='http://www.harpyness.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> ). </p>
<p>As to the actual content of the post, I think it&#8217;s awesome not only that these women are trying to change this structure from within, but that they are getting attention and support for doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/comment-page-1/#comment-23173</link>
		<dc:creator>rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13755#comment-23173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Desargues I think there is a subtle detail you are not addressing. We aren&#039;t discussing the validity of this-n-that, we are talking about those who work on the inside of a system to change it. We already went right up to the edge of that question: Why should a women even stay in a system that oppresses women? And we batted around some answers to that. But ultimately that wasn&#039;t the focus of the post or the discussion. 

It seems like that&#039;s where your interest lies, but I don&#039;t think you can forcibly drag the focus back to your point of  interest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desargues I think there is a subtle detail you are not addressing. We aren&#8217;t discussing the validity of this-n-that, we are talking about those who work on the inside of a system to change it. We already went right up to the edge of that question: Why should a women even stay in a system that oppresses women? And we batted around some answers to that. But ultimately that wasn&#8217;t the focus of the post or the discussion. </p>
<p>It seems like that&#8217;s where your interest lies, but I don&#8217;t think you can forcibly drag the focus back to your point of  interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeckySharper</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/01/god-is-not-a-segregationist/comment-page-1/#comment-23169</link>
		<dc:creator>BeckySharper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13755#comment-23169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Desargues, I suggest you reread this: &lt;em&gt; We reserve the right to delete your comment if we find it offensive or boring, regardless of your First Amendment right to be a boring, offensive internet jerk.  These are, of course, subjective standards, but as PilgrimSoul would tell you, if you think rules are objective anyway you’ve clearly never been to law school.&lt;/em&gt;

Everyone else in this comment thread is being entirely respectful of each other&#039;s religious beliefs or lack thereof.  You, on the other hand, show up and declare that you don&#039;t have to respect anyone&#039;s religious beliefs because they are--in your opinion--unworthy of respect. And then you condescend all over the fucking place, like a true Mansplainer.

You&#039;ve made your point. I&#039;ve made mine. If you can&#039;t engage respectfully, you will not be commenting here any longer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desargues, I suggest you reread this: <em> We reserve the right to delete your comment if we find it offensive or boring, regardless of your First Amendment right to be a boring, offensive internet jerk.  These are, of course, subjective standards, but as PilgrimSoul would tell you, if you think rules are objective anyway you’ve clearly never been to law school.</em></p>
<p>Everyone else in this comment thread is being entirely respectful of each other&#8217;s religious beliefs or lack thereof.  You, on the other hand, show up and declare that you don&#8217;t have to respect anyone&#8217;s religious beliefs because they are&#8211;in your opinion&#8211;unworthy of respect. And then you condescend all over the fucking place, like a true Mansplainer.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve made your point. I&#8217;ve made mine. If you can&#8217;t engage respectfully, you will not be commenting here any longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
