<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oscarlicious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 05:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aspiringexpatriate</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/comment-page-1/#comment-23606</link>
		<dc:creator>aspiringexpatriate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13929#comment-23606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Dziet_Sma and yvanehtnioj: Bright Star is wonderful, as is Hunger. I guess I&#039;m not familiar with art-house cliches to spot them, but Hunger to me was the best possible way to capture that specific history. I went into it terrified of getting an intensely political story and pitting a side as right or noble. And I left amazed and relieved that no one looked better or worse, just human-fantastically flawed confused and filled with murky motivation. The politics of the Troubles have been played and replayed over and over with every participant vilified or commended as heroes of the cause. Hunger simply made it human again. Frankly, as far as I can understand, that is where film excels.

This year I enjoyed lots of the films, though I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll remember any as utterly amazing except in spectacle. Though Rosamund Pike&#039;s turn as the thickest blonde from Thickton, London rivals Mulligan&#039;s standout show.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dziet_Sma and yvanehtnioj: Bright Star is wonderful, as is Hunger. I guess I&#8217;m not familiar with art-house cliches to spot them, but Hunger to me was the best possible way to capture that specific history. I went into it terrified of getting an intensely political story and pitting a side as right or noble. And I left amazed and relieved that no one looked better or worse, just human-fantastically flawed confused and filled with murky motivation. The politics of the Troubles have been played and replayed over and over with every participant vilified or commended as heroes of the cause. Hunger simply made it human again. Frankly, as far as I can understand, that is where film excels.</p>
<p>This year I enjoyed lots of the films, though I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll remember any as utterly amazing except in spectacle. Though Rosamund Pike&#8217;s turn as the thickest blonde from Thickton, London rivals Mulligan&#8217;s standout show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yvanehtnioj</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/comment-page-1/#comment-23559</link>
		<dc:creator>yvanehtnioj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13929#comment-23559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Dziet_Sma - Oh yes, that too.

@emilyanne - It&#039;s not that Clooney is put forth as the &quot;good at life&quot; character - but his problems are fleshed out and at least partially resolved, and when he can&#039;t connect with other people the audience is on his side.  Clooney can&#039;t connect, the audience wants him to be able to.  Clooney tries to connect with his sisters and it does work out or with a love interest and it doesn&#039;t work out, either way the audience is on his side.  Clooney lives alone and that&#039;s sad.

Kendrick&#039;s character, on the other hand, elicits eye-rolls and scorn with her audacious sense of confidence in her ideas, and when she falls apart the movie takes real glee in it, as if it&#039;s about time she got her comeuppance.  Young women shouldn&#039;t be in charge of overhauling a company&#039;s business plan!  Who the hell does she think she is??  Kendrick ends up alone and the audience hopes that she&#039;s learned her lesson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dziet_Sma &#8211; Oh yes, that too.</p>
<p>@emilyanne &#8211; It&#8217;s not that Clooney is put forth as the &#8220;good at life&#8221; character &#8211; but his problems are fleshed out and at least partially resolved, and when he can&#8217;t connect with other people the audience is on his side.  Clooney can&#8217;t connect, the audience wants him to be able to.  Clooney tries to connect with his sisters and it does work out or with a love interest and it doesn&#8217;t work out, either way the audience is on his side.  Clooney lives alone and that&#8217;s sad.</p>
<p>Kendrick&#8217;s character, on the other hand, elicits eye-rolls and scorn with her audacious sense of confidence in her ideas, and when she falls apart the movie takes real glee in it, as if it&#8217;s about time she got her comeuppance.  Young women shouldn&#8217;t be in charge of overhauling a company&#8217;s business plan!  Who the hell does she think she is??  Kendrick ends up alone and the audience hopes that she&#8217;s learned her lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diziet_Sma</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/comment-page-1/#comment-23555</link>
		<dc:creator>Diziet_Sma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13929#comment-23555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ yvanehtnioj: Also, Vera Farmiga&#039;s obvious body double in the sex scene? Very disappointing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ yvanehtnioj: Also, Vera Farmiga&#8217;s obvious body double in the sex scene? Very disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diziet_Sma</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/comment-page-1/#comment-23552</link>
		<dc:creator>Diziet_Sma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13929#comment-23552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll have to agree to disagree on Antichrist and The Hunger: I actually view Antichrist as &lt;i&gt;about&lt;/i&gt; misogyny; The Hunger, I felt, depoliticized an intensely political story to no good end (ie. it didn&#039;t emotionally engage me as a pay-off) and dealt in arthouse clichés, rather than true originality. However, I did react strongly to it - with loathing - which is more of a reaction than most films get, so I guess I have to acknowledge it has power. Of course, it&#039;s all subjective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree on Antichrist and The Hunger: I actually view Antichrist as <i>about</i> misogyny; The Hunger, I felt, depoliticized an intensely political story to no good end (ie. it didn&#8217;t emotionally engage me as a pay-off) and dealt in arthouse clichés, rather than true originality. However, I did react strongly to it &#8211; with loathing &#8211; which is more of a reaction than most films get, so I guess I have to acknowledge it has power. Of course, it&#8217;s all subjective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emilyanne</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/comment-page-1/#comment-23535</link>
		<dc:creator>emilyanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13929#comment-23535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diziet-Sma, good point I forgot Fish Tank, The Road and also Hunger (which wasn&#039;t eligible but which I only saw this year). 

Haven&#039;t seen Bright Star although I imagine I&#039;ll enjoy it based on the subject matter but I have to say I hated Antichrist with a passion, I loathe Von Trier I think he&#039;s a misogynistic prick who tries to hide his misogyny with supposedly empowered female characters. I&#039;m actually sick of watching women sacrifice themselves sexually in his films. He might be a visionary director but i don&#039;t think that counts when the vision is that puerile. Then again I&#039;ve never got over Breaking the Waves, a film which I think is among the most vile made and I wouldn&#039;t have willingly watched Antichrist (I had to for an article).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diziet-Sma, good point I forgot Fish Tank, The Road and also Hunger (which wasn&#8217;t eligible but which I only saw this year). </p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t seen Bright Star although I imagine I&#8217;ll enjoy it based on the subject matter but I have to say I hated Antichrist with a passion, I loathe Von Trier I think he&#8217;s a misogynistic prick who tries to hide his misogyny with supposedly empowered female characters. I&#8217;m actually sick of watching women sacrifice themselves sexually in his films. He might be a visionary director but i don&#8217;t think that counts when the vision is that puerile. Then again I&#8217;ve never got over Breaking the Waves, a film which I think is among the most vile made and I wouldn&#8217;t have willingly watched Antichrist (I had to for an article).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diziet_Sma</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/comment-page-1/#comment-23533</link>
		<dc:creator>Diziet_Sma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13929#comment-23533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: English language films - spot on. Most of the best films I&#039;ve seen recently have been &#039;foreign&#039;; The White Ribbon, especially, was in a whole other league, and I can&#039;t wait to see Un Prophete (Sur Mes Levres one of my all-time favorites) and Mother by Joon-ho Bong. Having said that, The Road, Fish Tank, Antichrist and Bright Star were all brilliant. I have to keep reminding myself that The Oscars is showbiz, and nothing to do with artistic merit!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: English language films &#8211; spot on. Most of the best films I&#8217;ve seen recently have been &#8216;foreign&#8217;; The White Ribbon, especially, was in a whole other league, and I can&#8217;t wait to see Un Prophete (Sur Mes Levres one of my all-time favorites) and Mother by Joon-ho Bong. Having said that, The Road, Fish Tank, Antichrist and Bright Star were all brilliant. I have to keep reminding myself that The Oscars is showbiz, and nothing to do with artistic merit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emilyanne</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/comment-page-1/#comment-23530</link>
		<dc:creator>emilyanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13929#comment-23530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[re Up in the Air - interesting takes, i didn&#039;t think we were supposed to think Clooney was good at life, i thought we were supposed to think exactly the opposite, that his life was hollow and empty and remained so because he had a fundamental inability to communicate properly with people, which made him good at his job but crap at pretty much everything else. I have to say I enjoyed the movie, didn&#039;t think it was amazing but didn&#039;t think it was terrible. 

I said it above and i&#039;ll say it again this was a very bad year for Anglocentric movies, all the foreign film noms were superior to the best pic list and I liked Hurt Locker, I do think it was the best film nominated but it was nowhere near the best film I saw this year. The academy needs to wake up and stop simply nominating US and UK films above everything else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re Up in the Air &#8211; interesting takes, i didn&#8217;t think we were supposed to think Clooney was good at life, i thought we were supposed to think exactly the opposite, that his life was hollow and empty and remained so because he had a fundamental inability to communicate properly with people, which made him good at his job but crap at pretty much everything else. I have to say I enjoyed the movie, didn&#8217;t think it was amazing but didn&#8217;t think it was terrible. </p>
<p>I said it above and i&#8217;ll say it again this was a very bad year for Anglocentric movies, all the foreign film noms were superior to the best pic list and I liked Hurt Locker, I do think it was the best film nominated but it was nowhere near the best film I saw this year. The academy needs to wake up and stop simply nominating US and UK films above everything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yvanehtnioj</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/comment-page-1/#comment-23523</link>
		<dc:creator>yvanehtnioj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13929#comment-23523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Dziet - Totally agree.  The whole time I was watching that movie I kept thinking that it was glaringly obvious that Anna Kendrick&#039;s character was written by a man.  The general unexplained incompetence, sobbing in the lobby of the hotel, the &quot;5-year Plan&quot; crap ... it was pretty obnoxiously &quot;Aren&#039;t women bad at life?  har har!&quot; to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dziet &#8211; Totally agree.  The whole time I was watching that movie I kept thinking that it was glaringly obvious that Anna Kendrick&#8217;s character was written by a man.  The general unexplained incompetence, sobbing in the lobby of the hotel, the &#8220;5-year Plan&#8221; crap &#8230; it was pretty obnoxiously &#8220;Aren&#8217;t women bad at life?  har har!&#8221; to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diziet_Sma</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/comment-page-1/#comment-23520</link>
		<dc:creator>Diziet_Sma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13929#comment-23520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t understand all the love for Up In The Air - it&#039;s formulaic, unrealistic and altogether unimaginative and predictable, from the acting to the cinematography to the music to the editing. I am supposed to believe that a hotshot young woman executive isn&#039;t aware of the existence of carry-on bags with wheels and doesn&#039;t know how to pack light? Ugh. George Clooney was basically sleepwalking through his part; he was far better in Michael Clayton and Syriana. I know why the Academy loves it - for the same reason it loved Crash: it reminds them of themselves. So happy it didn&#039;t win anything. And so happy for Kathryn and Hurt Locker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand all the love for Up In The Air &#8211; it&#8217;s formulaic, unrealistic and altogether unimaginative and predictable, from the acting to the cinematography to the music to the editing. I am supposed to believe that a hotshot young woman executive isn&#8217;t aware of the existence of carry-on bags with wheels and doesn&#8217;t know how to pack light? Ugh. George Clooney was basically sleepwalking through his part; he was far better in Michael Clayton and Syriana. I know why the Academy loves it &#8211; for the same reason it loved Crash: it reminds them of themselves. So happy it didn&#8217;t win anything. And so happy for Kathryn and Hurt Locker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadia</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/03/07/oscarlicious/comment-page-1/#comment-23518</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=13929#comment-23518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yay animated movies! I&#039;d love to see Up win. I saw it and then dragged other people out to see it and they liked it too. 

@emilyanne: ‘this is the sort of lets all pretend we love each other shite that the academy can’t help but vote for in order to pretend that they are caring people and not actually soul sucking greed demons. It’s bound to win even though it’s crap.’
Not exactly my words, but yes. Oh god yes. I didn&#039;t even need to see the movie to know it would win. 

And gogo you raise a good point about the Polanski shout outs. I&#039;m not big on the Oscars anyway, but with all the buzz all over the blogs I read I was thinking of watching. Now I&#039;m reconsidering.

So to cheer myself (and anyone else who needs it) up, have an Up remix http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2yt1ooLQGo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay animated movies! I&#8217;d love to see Up win. I saw it and then dragged other people out to see it and they liked it too. </p>
<p>@emilyanne: ‘this is the sort of lets all pretend we love each other shite that the academy can’t help but vote for in order to pretend that they are caring people and not actually soul sucking greed demons. It’s bound to win even though it’s crap.’<br />
Not exactly my words, but yes. Oh god yes. I didn&#8217;t even need to see the movie to know it would win. </p>
<p>And gogo you raise a good point about the Polanski shout outs. I&#8217;m not big on the Oscars anyway, but with all the buzz all over the blogs I read I was thinking of watching. Now I&#8217;m reconsidering.</p>
<p>So to cheer myself (and anyone else who needs it) up, have an Up remix <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2yt1ooLQGo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2yt1ooLQGo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
