<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Russian) Children Now Subject to No-Fault Warranty, Apparently</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeckySharper</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-25806</link>
		<dc:creator>BeckySharper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=14814#comment-25806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jones, what I especially took issue with is your characterization of adoptive parents as: 

“People desperate to raise other people’s children can’t seriously be expected to make decisions based on what’s best for the kid.” 

I’m sorry that you had a bad experience, and I want to be sensitive to that…yes, if you have an axe to grind, you&#039;re entitled to it. 

But to take your bad experience and act as though it gives you the right to smear every parent out there who has loved and raised “other people’s children” as their own…that’s just low. And WRONG.  Four members of my own family are adopted and to hear you describe their parents that way offends me deeply.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jones, what I especially took issue with is your characterization of adoptive parents as: </p>
<p>“People desperate to raise other people’s children can’t seriously be expected to make decisions based on what’s best for the kid.” </p>
<p>I’m sorry that you had a bad experience, and I want to be sensitive to that…yes, if you have an axe to grind, you&#8217;re entitled to it. </p>
<p>But to take your bad experience and act as though it gives you the right to smear every parent out there who has loved and raised “other people’s children” as their own…that’s just low. And WRONG.  Four members of my own family are adopted and to hear you describe their parents that way offends me deeply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-25788</link>
		<dc:creator>Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 05:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=14814#comment-25788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Becky, you&#039;re reading several things into my response that aren&#039;t there.

And maybe I have an axe to grind, but so what. Adoptees are entitled to their axes, they earned &#039;em like everyone else. The commodification of children is very real and exists in varying degrees across the adoption and fertility spectrum.

As I see it, informed consent in this context wouldn&#039;t be limited to adults. Domestically, group homes and supportive foster care are two alternative solutions until consent is given. Children in divorce custody cases oftentimes are asked which parent they want to live with. Why is it ridiculous that children without current parents should be extended the same opportunity to weigh in on such a profound decision? 

It&#039;s disheartening when the experiences and perspectives of adoptees are so summarily dismissed, especially when they don&#039;t conform to the &quot;grateful&quot; stereotype. That in itself is revealing. 

occhiblu: excellent points. 

Getting back to the story, thank you russian woman living abroad for the additional info. And thank you harpyness for writing about it. Interesting discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Becky, you&#8217;re reading several things into my response that aren&#8217;t there.</p>
<p>And maybe I have an axe to grind, but so what. Adoptees are entitled to their axes, they earned &#8216;em like everyone else. The commodification of children is very real and exists in varying degrees across the adoption and fertility spectrum.</p>
<p>As I see it, informed consent in this context wouldn&#8217;t be limited to adults. Domestically, group homes and supportive foster care are two alternative solutions until consent is given. Children in divorce custody cases oftentimes are asked which parent they want to live with. Why is it ridiculous that children without current parents should be extended the same opportunity to weigh in on such a profound decision? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s disheartening when the experiences and perspectives of adoptees are so summarily dismissed, especially when they don&#8217;t conform to the &#8220;grateful&#8221; stereotype. That in itself is revealing. </p>
<p>occhiblu: excellent points. </p>
<p>Getting back to the story, thank you russian woman living abroad for the additional info. And thank you harpyness for writing about it. Interesting discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-25715</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=14814#comment-25715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It breaks my heart when I think of the children who have to go through all of this, and I truly appreciate your rant.  I&#039;m working toward my MSW in hopes to work in the adoption/foster care field (eventually with North Korean refugee children), and I hope to bring the kind of reform we need.  Thank you so much for your passion on this issue.  It means a lot to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It breaks my heart when I think of the children who have to go through all of this, and I truly appreciate your rant.  I&#8217;m working toward my MSW in hopes to work in the adoption/foster care field (eventually with North Korean refugee children), and I hope to bring the kind of reform we need.  Thank you so much for your passion on this issue.  It means a lot to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harpity</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-25654</link>
		<dc:creator>Harpity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=14814#comment-25654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4/15 10 AM EST live, re-broadcast 7 PM, also available as podcast:

http://www.onpointradio.org/2010/04/a-new-look-at-global-adoption]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4/15 10 AM EST live, re-broadcast 7 PM, also available as podcast:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.onpointradio.org/2010/04/a-new-look-at-global-adoption" rel="nofollow">http://www.onpointradio.org/2010/04/a-new-look-at-global-adoption</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link(s): Wed, Apr 14th, 4pm &#124; Your Revolution (The Blog!)</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-25650</link>
		<dc:creator>Link(s): Wed, Apr 14th, 4pm &#124; Your Revolution (The Blog!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 04:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=14814#comment-25650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (Russian) Chil­dren Now Sub­ject to No-​​Fault War­ranty, Apparently [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Russian) Chil­dren Now Sub­ject to No-​​Fault War­ranty, Apparently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-25639</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=14814#comment-25639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow.  Just, umm, wow. This discussion is heartbreaking. Like this case has any more to do with adoption than the so-called octomom has to do with biological parenting. Do we have any reason to believe that there is a larger trend of adoptive parents trying to return their kids for refunds?

Swing by your local group home, folks. I doubt you will find many out-of-control youth signed over to the care of the state by adoptive families.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Just, umm, wow. This discussion is heartbreaking. Like this case has any more to do with adoption than the so-called octomom has to do with biological parenting. Do we have any reason to believe that there is a larger trend of adoptive parents trying to return their kids for refunds?</p>
<p>Swing by your local group home, folks. I doubt you will find many out-of-control youth signed over to the care of the state by adoptive families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harpity</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-25591</link>
		<dc:creator>Harpity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=14814#comment-25591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Pilgrim Soul: The issue may not be “this kid was just too hard to raise” but &quot;this kid was just too hard FOR THAT FAMILY to raise&quot;.

For whatever reasons. Which at this point, the rest of us know little about.

The mother may have felt that the child would be better off trying for another chance with a different, better-suited family. Which hopefully will be what happens. 

To repeat, NO it&#039;s not okay that she shoved him on a plane. But maybe what the local child welfare agency told her was the equivalent of &quot;tough luck, he&#039;s your problem now&quot;, and that was her desperate, irrational response.

Mostly though, I&#039;d rather postpone the tar-and-feathering until the facts are in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pilgrim Soul: The issue may not be “this kid was just too hard to raise” but &#8220;this kid was just too hard FOR THAT FAMILY to raise&#8221;.</p>
<p>For whatever reasons. Which at this point, the rest of us know little about.</p>
<p>The mother may have felt that the child would be better off trying for another chance with a different, better-suited family. Which hopefully will be what happens. </p>
<p>To repeat, NO it&#8217;s not okay that she shoved him on a plane. But maybe what the local child welfare agency told her was the equivalent of &#8220;tough luck, he&#8217;s your problem now&#8221;, and that was her desperate, irrational response.</p>
<p>Mostly though, I&#8217;d rather postpone the tar-and-feathering until the facts are in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: occhiblu</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-25569</link>
		<dc:creator>occhiblu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=14814#comment-25569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;I&gt;Maybe if you expose your kid to drugs in utero, or abuse her, or let someone else abuse her, you shouldn’t get to keep her. &lt;/I&gt;

I&#039;m really not ok with this, especially the idea that we should automatically seize children born to women who use drugs during pregnancy (and what drugs would those be?  An occasional glass of wine?  Coffee?  Or just the ones that more disadvantaged women tend to use?)  Strengthening social services and making them more accessible to more people makes sense, so that these families can get help; punishing women and children who are already in difficult circumstances by tearing apart their families and sending children into a generally insufficient system really does not help anyone.  

There are certainly times when children should be separated from their parents, but it really shouldn&#039;t automatically be a first-and-forever step.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Maybe if you expose your kid to drugs in utero, or abuse her, or let someone else abuse her, you shouldn’t get to keep her. </i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m really not ok with this, especially the idea that we should automatically seize children born to women who use drugs during pregnancy (and what drugs would those be?  An occasional glass of wine?  Coffee?  Or just the ones that more disadvantaged women tend to use?)  Strengthening social services and making them more accessible to more people makes sense, so that these families can get help; punishing women and children who are already in difficult circumstances by tearing apart their families and sending children into a generally insufficient system really does not help anyone.  </p>
<p>There are certainly times when children should be separated from their parents, but it really shouldn&#8217;t automatically be a first-and-forever step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-25547</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=14814#comment-25547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of interesting discussion, and I&#039;m glad, since mose of the media coverage I&#039;ve seen seems to focus on the sensationalistic &#039;how COULD she!?&#039; elements, rather than on the more substantive questions - what resources *do* we have in place for adoptive and bio parents dealing with these kinds of issues?  What preparation did the adoption agency provide for the Hansens, and is it an accepted standard?  Dissolution is *not* a return-kid-to-the-store process; was this dissolution being handled strangely? Thankfully this is NOT a common situation, but what safety nets do we have to help keep it uncommon? 

Not only is the consumer culture mindset a huge problem with some international adoptions, I think that the cultural narratives of &#039;love is all you need&#039; and &#039;families take care of their own&#039; combine dangerously in IA.  People feel that all they need to do is have enough love, then all will be well.  When that doesn&#039;t happen, they feel that they need to handle everything on their own.  When *that* doesn&#039;t happen, you can end up with clusterfucks like this one, and people feeling like &#039;oh, we&#039;re not really a family because we can&#039;t make it work.&#039;  The long process of making it work is what makes a family - the vast majority of bio and adoptive families know this, but I think adoptive families can have a really hard time if they&#039;re not prepared for problems with bonding.

And I cannot agree more about how much racism is involved in IA, but I hadn&#039;t thought about how people will ignore the cultural transition issues with a white European kid that they&#039;d pay attention to in an Asian kid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of interesting discussion, and I&#8217;m glad, since mose of the media coverage I&#8217;ve seen seems to focus on the sensationalistic &#8216;how COULD she!?&#8217; elements, rather than on the more substantive questions &#8211; what resources *do* we have in place for adoptive and bio parents dealing with these kinds of issues?  What preparation did the adoption agency provide for the Hansens, and is it an accepted standard?  Dissolution is *not* a return-kid-to-the-store process; was this dissolution being handled strangely? Thankfully this is NOT a common situation, but what safety nets do we have to help keep it uncommon? </p>
<p>Not only is the consumer culture mindset a huge problem with some international adoptions, I think that the cultural narratives of &#8216;love is all you need&#8217; and &#8216;families take care of their own&#8217; combine dangerously in IA.  People feel that all they need to do is have enough love, then all will be well.  When that doesn&#8217;t happen, they feel that they need to handle everything on their own.  When *that* doesn&#8217;t happen, you can end up with clusterfucks like this one, and people feeling like &#8216;oh, we&#8217;re not really a family because we can&#8217;t make it work.&#8217;  The long process of making it work is what makes a family &#8211; the vast majority of bio and adoptive families know this, but I think adoptive families can have a really hard time if they&#8217;re not prepared for problems with bonding.</p>
<p>And I cannot agree more about how much racism is involved in IA, but I hadn&#8217;t thought about how people will ignore the cultural transition issues with a white European kid that they&#8217;d pay attention to in an Asian kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeckySharper</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/04/13/russian-children-now-subject-to-no-fault-warranty-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-25542</link>
		<dc:creator>BeckySharper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=14814#comment-25542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jones: &lt;em&gt; IMO, adoptions should be rare, and should require the informed consent of the child in question. People desperate to raise other people’s children can’t seriously be expected to make decisions based on what’s best for the kid. &lt;/em&gt;

Give me a fucking break.  You obviously have a personal ax to grind, and you&#039;re willing to be a total asshole while you do it. Your blanket characterization of parents of adopted children as &quot;desperate&quot; people who can&#039;t possible care for any child who&#039;s not genetically theirs is incredibly offensive---it&#039;s purely nasty, judgmental and mean-spirited. It also sounds like you&#039;re saying only biological parents are capable of being good parents; a two minute trip to your local family court will blow that assertion out of the water.

On the practical side of things, you also don&#039;t make much sense either.

Since the vast majority of adopted children are adopted as babies or when very young, how exactly do you propose to get their informed consent?  

And if you think only informed-consent-giving adults should be adopted, who do you think should raise children given up by their parents? Orphanages and foster care?  


@Russian woman: Thanks for that comment--that&#039;s way more concrete information than I&#039;ve read in most news coverage of this story!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jones: <em> IMO, adoptions should be rare, and should require the informed consent of the child in question. People desperate to raise other people’s children can’t seriously be expected to make decisions based on what’s best for the kid. </em></p>
<p>Give me a fucking break.  You obviously have a personal ax to grind, and you&#8217;re willing to be a total asshole while you do it. Your blanket characterization of parents of adopted children as &#8220;desperate&#8221; people who can&#8217;t possible care for any child who&#8217;s not genetically theirs is incredibly offensive&#8212;it&#8217;s purely nasty, judgmental and mean-spirited. It also sounds like you&#8217;re saying only biological parents are capable of being good parents; a two minute trip to your local family court will blow that assertion out of the water.</p>
<p>On the practical side of things, you also don&#8217;t make much sense either.</p>
<p>Since the vast majority of adopted children are adopted as babies or when very young, how exactly do you propose to get their informed consent?  </p>
<p>And if you think only informed-consent-giving adults should be adopted, who do you think should raise children given up by their parents? Orphanages and foster care?  </p>
<p>@Russian woman: Thanks for that comment&#8211;that&#8217;s way more concrete information than I&#8217;ve read in most news coverage of this story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
