logo

search

  • Home
  • About the Harpies
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
delete
bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Auntie Gloria predicts the future.

Posted by PhDork in Thoughts, Feminism, Theory and Practice on Sep 13, 2010, 1:30pm | 11 comments

…and it’s kind of depressing.

While speaking at Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster, PA, Gloria Steinem (AKA “Gluryo Stinnerman” if you’re an ol-skool Jez reader) declared that gender equity is going to take another 150 years to achieve.

I haven’t had the chance to view it yet, but you can watch Auntie Gloria at F&M here (no transcript, sorry) to hear more about why she thinks it will take so long, and how it might be achieved.  You can read more about her presentation here.

Until then, though, I’m curious to know what you think of that prognostication:  does 150 years seem impossibly long?  (For comparison, it’s been 162 years since the Seneca Falls Convention.  Or does it seem hopelessly naive, as gender-based discrimination will always be with us?  If you were to hazard a guess, how long do you think it will take until feminism is truly no longer necessary (if ever)?  And, maybe most importantly, how will you know we’ve gotten there?

*Bonus points if you locate the sentence in the Lancaster Online story in desperate need of the Oxford comma!

11 Responses to “Auntie Gloria predicts the future.”

  1. BeckySharper says:
    September 13, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    Ooh! Firsties!

    She urged the audience to work toward community, reproductive freedom, democratic families, an end to child abuse and conflict resolution.

    Conflict resolution sucks, y’all.

  2. BeckySharper says:
    September 13, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    To be honest, if it takes ONLY another 150 years to achieve gender equality, I’ll be delighted. I suspect she’s speaking about gender equality in the US and other Western nations. There are a lot of places on earth that have an even longer way to go, with more deeply entrenched misogyny and sexist cultural/political imperatives than we do.

  3. FashionablyEvil says:
    September 13, 2010 at 3:30 pm

    Yeah, 150 years doesn’t sound totally unrealistic when you’re talking about changing attitudes like this

    After all, many people now believe that a woman can do what a man can do, she said. The problem is that they don’t believe a man can do what a woman can do, such as raise children.

    .

    That said, there are a lot of variables that could contribute to rapid change such as parental leave policies like Sweden’s, but on the whole, 150 years doesn’t seem like a bad guess.

  4. PhDork says:
    September 13, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    Gold star for Becky.

    I’ve been thinking this over, and I gotta say, I’m not sure that we’re ever going to be “over” gender. As much as I look forward to a post-feminist (because post-patriarchal) society I don’t know that we’re ever going to get there. I’m hopeful that legal protections will continue to move in favor of families, which is good for everybody, but I really feel that the corporatocracy is going to fight hammer and tongs against them.

  5. Ms. M says:
    September 13, 2010 at 5:12 pm

    I hate to say it, but I think 150 yrs might be about right for enough equal protections to be in place.

    I wonder however if we ever will get to a place where gender is not still an issue.

    We’ve got such an incredibly long way to go :(

  6. rodriguez says:
    September 13, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    150 might be right to correct all the legal inequalities visible to us now in the US, but the culture will lag. As for other countries, I could not comment.

    I’m convinced there are still issues that are not clear to us now, and we can’t even begin to predict when they will be resolved.

  7. bellacoker says:
    September 13, 2010 at 7:33 pm

    I would like to see it happen, but think it might end up being like cult leaders predicting the end of the world, damned inconvenient.

    It seems to me that people need things to struggle against, so I predict never. Or at least not as long as we give let our children cut their teeth on books illustrating Opposites.

  8. Endora says:
    September 14, 2010 at 10:54 am

    In 150 years I think a lot will be better, even if we’re not totally post-patriarchal.

    When I think about how I grew up (and I ain’t old by any stretch of the imagination), I feel it wasn’t terribly feminist at all – on the holidays, girls cooked and cleaned, and boys sat on their behinds. (That’s still the case, obvs.). I have even been explicitly advised by family members to ‘marry well’! Before all of that nonsense is totally eradicated, it will take a few generations. At least.

  9. mischiefmanager says:
    September 14, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    For once I’m the optimist in the bunch-maybe it’s the wisdom and perspective of my 56 years. :-) It’s so much better than when I was a kid, and I think that girls now have a completely different set of expectations for themselves than we did back in the day.

    I do agree, though, that gender problems will never completely disappear. But we can hope that rank, undisguised sexism will become generally frowned upon by both men and women.

    And yeah, Ph.Dork, just ask the US Chanber of Commerce about family-friendly business practices. They think that means that women will all spend all their time shopping and leave the jobs to the menz.

  10. laprofe63 says:
    September 15, 2010 at 12:11 am

    …depressing indeed. My magic eight ball tells me “Outlook not so good” on the gender equity in 150 years. When I asked if it would ever happen, it said “you may rely on it.” Personally I think it will only happen after we have all worked very, very hard to make it happen.

    Case in point, in talking to a fellow mom on the school playground this afternoon about kids and their reading preferences, she said her daughter wanted more books on princesses. We both sighed.

  11. rodriguez says:
    September 15, 2010 at 9:12 am

    Did you ever hear the thesis that says that slavery was never ever going to end until humans figured out how to mechanize lots of labor, starting from the industrial revolution? That we still would have slaves if we didn’t have a good way to do hard, repetitive things? That very few souls in that pre-industrial time, with no way to imagine mechanized labor, were willing to say, “we’ve got to take some of that sacrifice onto ourselves in order to eliminate slavery”?

    not that it means anything, but that idea sorta rings some bells in my head.

    I wonder if there’s an analogy to be made between the institution of slavery and patriarchy/gender equality.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

 

random posts

Poetry Saturdays: Mary Oliver...
Honorary Harpy: Dr. Marci Bowers...
Two Things To Smile About on a Monday...

recent comments

  • Matthew: I can offer one small defense of the original poster. If you...
  • Rebecca: I am a woman and I love wearing heels. The pain of them is b...
  • Jason: I agree for the most part, but the point at which I take iss...
  • Mr. Nice Guy: "Genuinely nice guys have nothing to worry about. Genuinely ...
  • Jill: Thank you for the truth. Now i know im doing the right thing...
  • Nikki: Thank you so much for this. Im going to have a medical ab do...

Tags

Abortion Activism Anger Anti-feminists Assweasels Beauty Culture Books Busybodies Children Choosing Your Choice Double Standards Education Empowerfulment Fashion Fat Is A Feminist Issue Feminism Great Male Narcissists Ladylike Endeavors LGBTQ Marriage Masculinity Misogyny Motherhood Overshare Poetry Saturday Politics Race Racism Rants Relationships Religion Reproductive rights Sex Sexism Sexual violence So-Called Self-Improvement Stereotypes The Media Theory and Practice Things That Are Awesome Unexpected Consequences Violence against women and girls Women's Health Women's Work Work Administrative Professionals Day (2)
Anonymous Prosecutor (4)
Culcha Vulcha (54)
Discussion Time (9)
Feminist Food for Thought (55)
Friday Fun Thread (95)
Guest Post (49)
Harpy Book Club (64)
Harpy Cinematical Society (19)
Harpy Droppings (2)
Harpy Hall of Fame (27)
Harpy Periodical (3)
Harpy Seminar (29)
Harpy Shout-out (63)
Harpy Televisual Society (4)
Heard (7)
Help Me Harpies! (20)
Honorary Harpies (18)
Housekeeping (37)
International Museum of Women (1)
Language Matters (25)
Let's Talk Images (5)
Linkaround (27)
LOL (5)
Morning Snark (49)
Poetry Saturdays (6)
Reader Request (17)
Retro Pleasures (13)
Solo Flying (66)
Thoughts (1212)
Thursday Night Trivia (11)
Wednesday Whiplash (1)
You Have Got To Be Fucking Kidding Me (139)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.

Blogroll

  • A Truly Elegant Mess
  • Bitch
  • Bookslut
  • Deeply Problematic
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • F Bomb
  • Feminist Law Professors
  • Feminist Philosophers
  • Feministe
  • Feministing
  • Fugitivus
  • FWD/Forward
  • Geek Feminism
  • gudbuy t'jane
  • Hoyden About Town
  • Hysteria!
  • I Blame the Patriarchy
  • Jezebel
  • Kate Harding’s Shapely Prose
  • Katha Pollitt
  • Like a Whisper
  • Maud Newton
  • Pandagon
  • Racialicious
  • Rage Against the Man-chine
  • Salon’s Broadsheet
  • Shakesville
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Angry Black Woman
  • The Crunk Feminist Collective
  • The Curvature
  • The F Word
  • The Feminist Agenda
  • The Feminist Texican
  • Tiger Beatdown
  • Womanist Musings

Archives

  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

Search

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN
  • WordPress

google

google

.

Copyright © 2013. Creative Commons License
The Pursuit of Harpyness is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes

The harpy art you see in our banner above is by Ursula Dodge. Visit her etsy store!