<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Booknotes: Dear John, I Love Jane</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2011/01/17/booknotes-dear-john-i-love-jane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/01/17/booknotes-dear-john-i-love-jane/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 05:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/01/17/booknotes-dear-john-i-love-jane/comment-page-1/#comment-65152</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=18482#comment-65152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry this is so late, but I was only able to score a copy of Dear John just now, though I&#039;ve been wanting to read it for a while. I really liked Lisa Diamond&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Sexual Fluidity&lt;/i&gt;, but was ultimately disappointed in &lt;i&gt;Dear John&lt;/i&gt;, for the same set of reasons you presented here: the uneven writing and especially the lack of diversity. From what I cold tell, It was overwhelmingly middle-to-upper-middle class. I would have loved to have seen some working-class women&#039;s experiences with coming out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry this is so late, but I was only able to score a copy of Dear John just now, though I&#8217;ve been wanting to read it for a while. I really liked Lisa Diamond&#8217;s <i>Sexual Fluidity</i>, but was ultimately disappointed in <i>Dear John</i>, for the same set of reasons you presented here: the uneven writing and especially the lack of diversity. From what I cold tell, It was overwhelmingly middle-to-upper-middle class. I would have loved to have seen some working-class women&#8217;s experiences with coming out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Link Round Up &#171; The Lesbrary</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/01/17/booknotes-dear-john-i-love-jane/comment-page-1/#comment-61889</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Link Round Up &#171; The Lesbrary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=18482#comment-61889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Dear John, I Love Jane edited by Candace Walsh and Laura Andre was reviewed at The Pursuit of Harpyness. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dear John, I Love Jane edited by Candace Walsh and Laura Andre was reviewed at The Pursuit of Harpyness. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danika the Lesbrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/01/17/booknotes-dear-john-i-love-jane/comment-page-1/#comment-61811</link>
		<dc:creator>Danika the Lesbrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=18482#comment-61811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t reviewed it yet, but I loved this book. The writing was a lot higher quality than I was expecting, and I loved the variety of experiences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t reviewed it yet, but I loved this book. The writing was a lot higher quality than I was expecting, and I loved the variety of experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. M</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/01/17/booknotes-dear-john-i-love-jane/comment-page-1/#comment-59785</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=18482#comment-59785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for this post!  I really love the postings you have done so far annajcook.  This idea of female sexual fluidity makes a lot of sense to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post!  I really love the postings you have done so far annajcook.  This idea of female sexual fluidity makes a lot of sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Booknotes: Dear John, I Love Jane - The Pursuit of Harpyness -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/01/17/booknotes-dear-john-i-love-jane/comment-page-1/#comment-59705</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Booknotes: Dear John, I Love Jane - The Pursuit of Harpyness -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=18482#comment-59705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vyckie D. Garrison. Vyckie D. Garrison said: @TPoHarpyness: Booknotes: Dear John, I Love Jane: Over the winter break, I had a chance to read... http://bit.ly/iguU9q #feminist #women [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vyckie D. Garrison. Vyckie D. Garrison said: @TPoHarpyness: Booknotes: Dear John, I Love Jane: Over the winter break, I had a chance to read&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/iguU9q" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/iguU9q</a> #feminist #women [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
