logo

search

  • Home
  • About the Harpies
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
delete
bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Jack Layton and the New Democratic Party

Posted by Marie Anelle in Thoughts, Politics on Apr 27, 2011, 4:10pm | 8 comments

K….sooooo….this is where I try to be fair and balanced.  Not sure if that’s going to work out so well, because I am a dipper (nickname for

Do my politics get your vote? Okay, how about now?

those who vote NDP).  As Canada’s most visible left leaning party, they’re pretty much encapsulating what us lefties are suggesting.  They want to raise corporate taxes, improve the environment, better help those in need and stand for LGBT rights like no other party does.  So much so that the NDP was the first political party to sign on to the Declaration of Montreal and their MP Bill Siksay was responsible for Bill C-389, which unfortunately died after the election call.  A big one for a huge segment of the population is that the NDP wants to improve the status of Aboriginals and better the relationship with Canada.  Of course, this is only some of the highlights and I encourage people to check out the NDP platform here.

What was an upstart party in 1961 at the hands of Tommy Douglas (better known as the father of Universal Healthcare) has had its share of history.  During the 1972-74 minority years of Trudeau the NDP worked with the government, passing some pretty progressive stuff.  However when the NDP decided to work with conservatives in a vote of non-confidence in 1974, it backfired, giving Trudeau a majority government at the expense of NDP seats.  The height of NDP popularity happened under leader Ed Broadbent, who was a vastly popular figure in Canada.  Their record number of seats in the house sits at 43 after the 1988 election.  Unfortunately for the NDP, it went on a decline after Mr. Broadbent stepped down.  Thanks to infighting about various things like Western alienation and Quebec Nationalism combined with disasters in provincial politics and the creation of the Reform Party, the party lost it’s traction to the point that after the 1993 election the NDP was routed.  Gaining only 9 seats, they were 3 seats short of official party status.  Under Alexa McDonough, the NDP made breakthroughs in Atlantic Canada, breathing life back into the party and seeing 21 seats after 1997.  Although after pissing off the CAW union for trying to move to a more centrist position and having party members cross the floor, support was falling and the seats fell to 13 by 2000.  Ms. McDonough stepped down in 2002 due to family reasons.

Up for bat?  Jack Layton.

Layton managed to beat long standing, and pretty popular in the NDP, MP Bill Blaikie in 2002 to become leader of the NDP, being first elected to the House of Commons in 2004.  Though Layton was optimistic about gaining more seats, they only gained 19 in that election.  What cost them?  Many exit polls show that voters went for the Liberals to keep the new formed Conservative Party from gaining leadership.  The Liberals also recruited many popular NDP members to run as Liberals to convince the left that Liberal is the only way to beat the Conservatives (a scare tactic they’re currently using, I might add).   In 2005, Layton seconded Harper’s motion of non-confidence after trying to convince the Liberals to ban private healthcare and sent Canadians to the polls.  The subsequent election saw the NDP’s seat count rise to 29, rising to 30 after a by-election in Outremont, marking the second time ever that the NDP won a seat in Quebec.  In the 2008 election, they won 37 seats, showing that rise in popularity.  They subsequently lost a seat after a by-election in Winnipeg.

During his time in Parliament, he has supported the legislation that allowed same sex marriage in Canada.  In 2004 he was initially part of a plan to work with the official opposition possibly in the form of a coalition, and while “coalition” seems to be the dirty word du jour in this election, Layton has always made it abundantly clear that no matter how the chips fall, he is interested in working WITH the parties in the best interest of Canadians.  In 2006, probably his most unpopular move with income trust earners was siding with Harper to change the rules on income trust, a move that the Canadian Association of Income Trust Investors say cost a lot of money.  He met with the Afghan president in 2006 to say that the military role in Afghanistan should be less combat, more of the peacekeeping Canada was known for.  Layton also threatened a non-confidence motion if the Conservatives did not improve the Clean Air Act, a move that Harper complied with, subsequently sending the piece back to a special committee.  In 2008, Layton voted in favor of letting conscientious objectors to remain in Canada should they defect, a motion put forth by his MP wife, Olivia Chow.  He also counselled Harper in regards to the official apology to Residential School survivors and was subsequently thanked before the speech.  He also spoke in favor of net neutrality and keeping corporations out of it.

After the 2008 election, he did propose a coalition with the Liberal party along with the support of the Bloc.  However, the move was unpopular with Canadians and when Ignatieff subsequently stepped in, he couldn’t be less interested.  Did I mention that Harper prorogued Parliament after this?  Because he’s democratic like that.  Layton attempted to send Canadians to the polls during the 2009 budget, but the move was stopped by Liberal support.  This favor was returned to the Liberals later that year when the NDP abstained on a confidence motion, though some see it as a savy move since public opinion in regards to an election was not all that great.

Unfortunately Layton has been mired with health problems, first battling prostate cancer and recently going through hip surgery.  He still insists that he his fit to run and be in Parliament, and judging by the latest polls, showing one hell of a massive surge, it seems that Canadians don’t mind it.  In fact, his likability factor is much higher than other leaders and it seems to be showing some good favor this time around.  The problem with polls and the NDP, as always, is seeing how they translate on election night.  However, many factors seem to be cementing this surge into a reality.

What seems to be causing this shift?  Well, this is the most advertising he has ever done in a campaign, which helps for visibility.  The ads are also less of the weird attacks you’ve been seeing from the Conservatives, dealing more with facts and shit that really happened, and let’s be honest….they’re really fucking cute.  Also, while the other parties are getting nastier, he’s been rolling out ads like these instead.  They’re also capitalizing on what seems to be Bloc fatigue in Quebec.  It seems that having an unlikeable leader in the Liberal seat is also helping.  My optimistic self thinks that maybe people are just plain tired of the same old parties and since the NDP hasn’t truly had a chance to embarrass itself like the Liberals and Conservatives, well, it couldn’t hurt to try.

Though the media is trotting out a scary thought.  This surge may result in a Conservative majority due to vote splitting.  My highest hope is that it doesn’t happen, since other scenarios can end up being true.

Anything else you’d like to add?  Hit me up in the comments, as always!

 

 

8 Responses to “Jack Layton and the New Democratic Party”

  1. Kari says:
    April 27, 2011 at 5:04 pm

    I’m just happy that my riding is a split riding between a sitting Conservative MP and an NDP candidate who lost by less than 10% last election… not only is voting with my conscience in perfect alignment with voting strategically, but the NDP could conceivably win this seat!

  2. debbie says:
    April 28, 2011 at 11:37 am

    I live in a riding that always goes Liberal, so I will vote my conscience and vote for the NDP. I have done the strategic voting thing before when I lived in a riding where there was a close Liberal/Conservative split, and it left a bad taste in my mouth. I’m glad that I don’t feel obligated to do it again.

    I was particularly impressed with Layton in the English leadership debates for bringing up the issue of violence against women in Canada, and highlighting the absolutely appalling rates of violence directed at First Nations women.

  3. wondering says:
    April 28, 2011 at 2:11 pm

    I have nothing substantial to say other than:

    - Thank you for writing this! The more publicity the better.

    - Go Jack Go!

    (Did you see that the Globe and Mail just endorsed the Conservatives? (for what, the 3rd time in a row?) Their comments section just exploded in outrage. A joy to see. Not that it will kill the “Liberal media” meme.)

  4. skara says:
    April 28, 2011 at 7:32 pm

    wondering, thanks for pointing out the globe endorsement… and just when I started to feel positively about that paper.

    Marie, I really enjoyed this article. I actually have the privilege of deciding where to vote, since I technically live in two ridings right now. One is staunchly NDP, the first NDP riding I’ve lived in, and the other is one of the 33 swing ridings, this one between the libs and the tories. I think this time I will have to suck it up and vote Liberal, knowing that my NDP candidate will win. but it breaks my heart not to support them with my vote.

  5. wondering says:
    April 28, 2011 at 10:58 pm

    It’s sickly amusing that the “Liberal media” meme sticks, even though the Nat Post, Globe and Mail, Sun media, CTV, Globe, etc are all solid Conservative backers. They are, after all, corporate entities. They know who butters their bread.

    (Although of course individual journalists may be quite progressive, the editorial slant of the paper can definitely twist that around fast.)

  6. Hilary says:
    April 29, 2011 at 6:34 pm

    Guys, the NDP numbers keep going up and up. The pollsters and pundits are using words like “unprecedented” – gaining 18 points over the course of an election campaign has never happened here. Monday will be very, very tense, and exciting!

  7. Mackey says:
    May 2, 2011 at 1:38 am

    A friend of mine has a pseophologist blog called “The Tally Room”, and he has a couple of posts about the Canadian election.

    Have a look at this one about the rise of the NDP here:
    http://www.tallyroom.com.au/9429

  8. Isa says:
    May 2, 2011 at 5:07 am

    I almost always vote NDP and I will again tomorrow, for many of the reasons you listed.

    Although I can’t say I approve of that Montreal jersey. ;)

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

 

random posts

Bigots and the “Ground Zero Mosque”...
Is No Sex Still Sex Positive?...
In Which I Roll My Eyes...

recent comments

  • Matthew: I can offer one small defense of the original poster. If you...
  • Rebecca: I am a woman and I love wearing heels. The pain of them is b...
  • Jason: I agree for the most part, but the point at which I take iss...
  • Mr. Nice Guy: "Genuinely nice guys have nothing to worry about. Genuinely ...
  • Jill: Thank you for the truth. Now i know im doing the right thing...
  • Nikki: Thank you so much for this. Im going to have a medical ab do...

Tags

Abortion Activism Anger Anti-feminists Assweasels Beauty Culture Books Busybodies Children Choosing Your Choice Double Standards Education Empowerfulment Fashion Fat Is A Feminist Issue Feminism Great Male Narcissists Ladylike Endeavors LGBTQ Marriage Masculinity Misogyny Motherhood Overshare Poetry Saturday Politics Race Racism Rants Relationships Religion Reproductive rights Sex Sexism Sexual violence So-Called Self-Improvement Stereotypes The Media Theory and Practice Things That Are Awesome Unexpected Consequences Violence against women and girls Women's Health Women's Work Work Administrative Professionals Day (2)
Anonymous Prosecutor (4)
Culcha Vulcha (54)
Discussion Time (9)
Feminist Food for Thought (55)
Friday Fun Thread (95)
Guest Post (49)
Harpy Book Club (64)
Harpy Cinematical Society (19)
Harpy Droppings (2)
Harpy Hall of Fame (27)
Harpy Periodical (3)
Harpy Seminar (29)
Harpy Shout-out (63)
Harpy Televisual Society (4)
Heard (7)
Help Me Harpies! (20)
Honorary Harpies (18)
Housekeeping (37)
International Museum of Women (1)
Language Matters (25)
Let's Talk Images (5)
Linkaround (27)
LOL (5)
Morning Snark (49)
Poetry Saturdays (6)
Reader Request (17)
Retro Pleasures (13)
Solo Flying (66)
Thoughts (1212)
Thursday Night Trivia (11)
Wednesday Whiplash (1)
You Have Got To Be Fucking Kidding Me (139)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.

Blogroll

  • A Truly Elegant Mess
  • Bitch
  • Bookslut
  • Deeply Problematic
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • F Bomb
  • Feminist Law Professors
  • Feminist Philosophers
  • Feministe
  • Feministing
  • Fugitivus
  • FWD/Forward
  • Geek Feminism
  • gudbuy t'jane
  • Hoyden About Town
  • Hysteria!
  • I Blame the Patriarchy
  • Jezebel
  • Kate Harding’s Shapely Prose
  • Katha Pollitt
  • Like a Whisper
  • Maud Newton
  • Pandagon
  • Racialicious
  • Rage Against the Man-chine
  • Salon’s Broadsheet
  • Shakesville
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Angry Black Woman
  • The Crunk Feminist Collective
  • The Curvature
  • The F Word
  • The Feminist Agenda
  • The Feminist Texican
  • Tiger Beatdown
  • Womanist Musings

Archives

  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

Search

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN
  • WordPress

google

google

.

Copyright © 2013. Creative Commons License
The Pursuit of Harpyness is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes

The harpy art you see in our banner above is by Ursula Dodge. Visit her etsy store!