<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Pro-Life&#8221; GOP Will Now Starve Poor Babies Over Planned Parenthood Funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhiannon</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-68583</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhiannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 06:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=19799#comment-68583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our ( by &#039;our&#039; I mean Australia) lovely Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott, is the (amazingly sexist, misogynistic and AWFUL)person who in his role in the previous government was instrumental in having RU486 banned. So - Australian women HAVE to wait until week 8 to have a (surgical)termination. It&#039;s all about how to make things harder for women and their families.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our ( by &#8216;our&#8217; I mean Australia) lovely Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott, is the (amazingly sexist, misogynistic and AWFUL)person who in his role in the previous government was instrumental in having RU486 banned. So &#8211; Australian women HAVE to wait until week 8 to have a (surgical)termination. It&#8217;s all about how to make things harder for women and their families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SunlessNick</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-67591</link>
		<dc:creator>SunlessNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 21:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=19799#comment-67591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[P.S. When I said &quot;as was,&quot; I meant not by me; I saw it and it stayed with me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. When I said &#8220;as was,&#8221; I meant not by me; I saw it and it stayed with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SunlessNick</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-67590</link>
		<dc:creator>SunlessNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 21:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=19799#comment-67590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SarahMC has already given the answer I would have - that a foetus, regardless of its level of humanity, does not have the right for a woman to be forced to yield up her body to it.  As was remarked in another forum a while back, even the &lt;em&gt;dead&lt;/em&gt; can&#039;t have their bodies used without their prior consent.  The anti-choice position is one that positions women as having fewer rights than a corpse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SarahMC has already given the answer I would have &#8211; that a foetus, regardless of its level of humanity, does not have the right for a woman to be forced to yield up her body to it.  As was remarked in another forum a while back, even the <em>dead</em> can&#8217;t have their bodies used without their prior consent.  The anti-choice position is one that positions women as having fewer rights than a corpse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonic</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-67555</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=19799#comment-67555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[baraquiel is right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>baraquiel is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baraqiel</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-67535</link>
		<dc:creator>baraqiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=19799#comment-67535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@M - You do understand that high-quality care includes contraception, right?  Condoms?  The pill?  Maybe even an IUD?  If you want to say that most &quot;pro-life&quot; organizations support increased access to contraception and the education needed to use it for poor women, you have to know that that&#039;s blatantly untrue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@M &#8211; You do understand that high-quality care includes contraception, right?  Condoms?  The pill?  Maybe even an IUD?  If you want to say that most &#8220;pro-life&#8221; organizations support increased access to contraception and the education needed to use it for poor women, you have to know that that&#8217;s blatantly untrue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mischiefmanager</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-67529</link>
		<dc:creator>mischiefmanager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=19799#comment-67529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, the term pro-life is a lie.  Anti-choicers have proved over and over that the only lives that matter to them are fetal ones.  The lives of women, people on death row, victims of gun violence...those lives mean nothing.

Second, look at who&#039;s driving anti-choice movements and legislation in this country.  It&#039;s men.  Some anti organizations may try the ploy of putting a woman in front, but there is no doubt at all that this is a male-led and male-driven movement.  And even if it weren&#039;t, so what?  The anti-choice agenda is to deny women the ability to control our lives and our bodies.  It doesn&#039;t matter who&#039;s doing it, it&#039;s evil and wrong.

Never once in my life have I heard of a legitimate women&#039;s health clinic that refused to do abortions out of &quot;conscience&quot;.    If M is referring to crisis pregnancy &quot;clinics,&quot; calling them clinics is another lie.  They are operated by religious fanatics who are more often than not completely untrained laypeople.  There is no intent to provide real health care.  Instead, the intent is to terrorize, intimidate, and guilt vulnerable women into gong through with an unwanted pregnancy.  

M is trying, as antis always do, to change the subject.  When it comes to abortion, or any other reproductive health care issue, the one and only subject is women.  Period. 

Finally, M, how dare you compare words to acts?  I agree that words can be deadly.  But Verity was clearly not being literal, whereas antis have literally commanded each other to murder abortion providers, and have literally done so.  To my knowledge, there has never-ever-been an instance of an abortion rights supporter physically attacking an anti beyond pushes or shoves. 

Anti-choice is anti-woman, anti-child, and anti-family.    M&#039;s post is nothing but an exercise in disingenuousness and propaganda.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the term pro-life is a lie.  Anti-choicers have proved over and over that the only lives that matter to them are fetal ones.  The lives of women, people on death row, victims of gun violence&#8230;those lives mean nothing.</p>
<p>Second, look at who&#8217;s driving anti-choice movements and legislation in this country.  It&#8217;s men.  Some anti organizations may try the ploy of putting a woman in front, but there is no doubt at all that this is a male-led and male-driven movement.  And even if it weren&#8217;t, so what?  The anti-choice agenda is to deny women the ability to control our lives and our bodies.  It doesn&#8217;t matter who&#8217;s doing it, it&#8217;s evil and wrong.</p>
<p>Never once in my life have I heard of a legitimate women&#8217;s health clinic that refused to do abortions out of &#8220;conscience&#8221;.    If M is referring to crisis pregnancy &#8220;clinics,&#8221; calling them clinics is another lie.  They are operated by religious fanatics who are more often than not completely untrained laypeople.  There is no intent to provide real health care.  Instead, the intent is to terrorize, intimidate, and guilt vulnerable women into gong through with an unwanted pregnancy.  </p>
<p>M is trying, as antis always do, to change the subject.  When it comes to abortion, or any other reproductive health care issue, the one and only subject is women.  Period. </p>
<p>Finally, M, how dare you compare words to acts?  I agree that words can be deadly.  But Verity was clearly not being literal, whereas antis have literally commanded each other to murder abortion providers, and have literally done so.  To my knowledge, there has never-ever-been an instance of an abortion rights supporter physically attacking an anti beyond pushes or shoves. </p>
<p>Anti-choice is anti-woman, anti-child, and anti-family.    M&#8217;s post is nothing but an exercise in disingenuousness and propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahMC</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-67528</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=19799#comment-67528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mean wow. A 3 week &lt;i&gt;embryo&lt;/i&gt; with a heartbeat! I suppose when you&#039;re trying to outlaw abortion after week 20/16/12, etc., you&#039;ve got to keep adjusting your emotionally-loaded lies about human development.

Am I supposed to be particularly swayed by the existence of the heart organ? Because it&#039;s supposed to make me believe it&#039;s where the &quot;baby&quot; feels lurve or something?

I am so sick of this shit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean wow. A 3 week <i>embryo</i> with a heartbeat! I suppose when you&#8217;re trying to outlaw abortion after week 20/16/12, etc., you&#8217;ve got to keep adjusting your emotionally-loaded lies about human development.</p>
<p>Am I supposed to be particularly swayed by the existence of the heart organ? Because it&#8217;s supposed to make me believe it&#8217;s where the &#8220;baby&#8221; feels lurve or something?</p>
<p>I am so sick of this shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_smithson</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-67527</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_smithson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=19799#comment-67527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just because there are women involved in the antichoice movement doesn&#039;t negate that the fundamental effect of the movement is the control of women through their biology.  Your assertion is fallacious.  There are tons of women who are misogynists.

And the &quot;personhood&quot; of potential human life is NOT on the table when it comes at the DIRECT expense of ACTUAL women&#039;s lives, especially my own.  This is approaching the debate from the antichoice perspective alone and framing it using only a certain set of begging the question fallacious rhetoric.

And, FYI - the heart BEGINS to form in week 4.  All four chambers and any blood aren&#039;t present until sometime in weeks 5-6. In week 3, the connections are still being made between the fetus and Woman after the very recent implantation and true beginning of pregnancy.  There is no heart to beat in week 3, only a layer of cells that may eventually differentiate into a heart and may then begin to beat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because there are women involved in the antichoice movement doesn&#8217;t negate that the fundamental effect of the movement is the control of women through their biology.  Your assertion is fallacious.  There are tons of women who are misogynists.</p>
<p>And the &#8220;personhood&#8221; of potential human life is NOT on the table when it comes at the DIRECT expense of ACTUAL women&#8217;s lives, especially my own.  This is approaching the debate from the antichoice perspective alone and framing it using only a certain set of begging the question fallacious rhetoric.</p>
<p>And, FYI &#8211; the heart BEGINS to form in week 4.  All four chambers and any blood aren&#8217;t present until sometime in weeks 5-6. In week 3, the connections are still being made between the fetus and Woman after the very recent implantation and true beginning of pregnancy.  There is no heart to beat in week 3, only a layer of cells that may eventually differentiate into a heart and may then begin to beat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kokomo</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-67522</link>
		<dc:creator>kokomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=19799#comment-67522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@M: Perhaps it&#039;s mostly women who are most involved in the pro-life movement - perhaps.  But the women involved are those women who are most controlled by the patriarchy, most invested in its status quo.

The abortion issue *is* complicated, perhaps more complicated than you give it credit for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@M: Perhaps it&#8217;s mostly women who are most involved in the pro-life movement &#8211; perhaps.  But the women involved are those women who are most controlled by the patriarchy, most invested in its status quo.</p>
<p>The abortion issue *is* complicated, perhaps more complicated than you give it credit for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahMC</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/04/28/pro-life-gop-will-now-starve-poor-babies-over-planned-parenthood-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-67521</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=19799#comment-67521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M, don&#039;t even. Violence as a reaction to oppression is not the same as violence as a means to oppress. And merely saying you feel like getting violent as a reaction to oppression (I agree!) is even less like violence as a means to oppress.

I don&#039;t care if an embryo is human, if it has a beating heart (!) or its own genetic code. It has no right to exist inside another person who doesn&#039;t want it there. Bye bye.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M, don&#8217;t even. Violence as a reaction to oppression is not the same as violence as a means to oppress. And merely saying you feel like getting violent as a reaction to oppression (I agree!) is even less like violence as a means to oppress.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if an embryo is human, if it has a beating heart (!) or its own genetic code. It has no right to exist inside another person who doesn&#8217;t want it there. Bye bye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
