<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Reading Better the Second (or Third or Fourth) Time Around?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:13:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: catnmus</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/comment-page-1/#comment-78601</link>
		<dc:creator>catnmus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21676#comment-78601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s funny that Stephen King wouldn&#039;t read Jane Austen, because two books that I repeatedly reread (and I don&#039;t reread much anymore, because time is limited and I&#039;ve decided I&#039;d mostly rather read new things) are &quot;Pride and Prejudice&quot; (Austen) and &quot;The Stand&quot; (King).  Two others I reread are &quot;These Happy Golden Years&quot; (Wilder) and &quot;Little Women&quot; (Alcott).

One book I would unfortunately not suggest rereading is &quot;Life of Pi&quot; (Martel).  It loses all its magic and mystery the second time around.  Love it the first time, remember it forever, pass it along to someone else, but don&#039;t reread it.  That&#039;s my advice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that Stephen King wouldn&#8217;t read Jane Austen, because two books that I repeatedly reread (and I don&#8217;t reread much anymore, because time is limited and I&#8217;ve decided I&#8217;d mostly rather read new things) are &#8220;Pride and Prejudice&#8221; (Austen) and &#8220;The Stand&#8221; (King).  Two others I reread are &#8220;These Happy Golden Years&#8221; (Wilder) and &#8220;Little Women&#8221; (Alcott).</p>
<p>One book I would unfortunately not suggest rereading is &#8220;Life of Pi&#8221; (Martel).  It loses all its magic and mystery the second time around.  Love it the first time, remember it forever, pass it along to someone else, but don&#8217;t reread it.  That&#8217;s my advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadow Boxer</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/comment-page-1/#comment-78515</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadow Boxer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21676#comment-78515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m late to this thread because I&#039;m in the throes of re-reading! I have my minor field exam on Monday and I&#039;m re-reading the books on my list that I&#039;d read before the semester started. I have 8 left. My head hurts.

But as far as the intent of this thread goes, I&#039;m with Es - I re-read everything. Literally. If I&#039;m not going to re-read it, it goes to a book swap, the library, or a used book shop.

My favorites to re-read are Mercedes Lackey and other fantasy/sci-fi. I think I&#039;ve said it before, but I can no longer read Anne McCaffery anymore. I am finding I really appreciate silly fantasy/sci-fi. I spend so much time reading about rape, war, labor strife, the suffrage movement, more war and rape, that I just can&#039;t deal with it in my fiction anymore. I think there&#039;s going to be a culling of my personal library very soon. Which my local public library will profoundly appreciate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m late to this thread because I&#8217;m in the throes of re-reading! I have my minor field exam on Monday and I&#8217;m re-reading the books on my list that I&#8217;d read before the semester started. I have 8 left. My head hurts.</p>
<p>But as far as the intent of this thread goes, I&#8217;m with Es &#8211; I re-read everything. Literally. If I&#8217;m not going to re-read it, it goes to a book swap, the library, or a used book shop.</p>
<p>My favorites to re-read are Mercedes Lackey and other fantasy/sci-fi. I think I&#8217;ve said it before, but I can no longer read Anne McCaffery anymore. I am finding I really appreciate silly fantasy/sci-fi. I spend so much time reading about rape, war, labor strife, the suffrage movement, more war and rape, that I just can&#8217;t deal with it in my fiction anymore. I think there&#8217;s going to be a culling of my personal library very soon. Which my local public library will profoundly appreciate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Es</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/comment-page-1/#comment-78401</link>
		<dc:creator>Es</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21676#comment-78401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also reread everything - if I read something once and know I&#039;m not going to read it again, it goes off to the charity shop. (Or the recycling bag, in the case of Twilight, which I read the first half of before all the kerfuffle about it and was inspired by such violent rage that I wasn&#039;t going to charity shop it because I refused to be responsible for anyone else reading it!)

I read Catch-22 probably four times a year, Fire and Hemlock (Diana Wynne Jones) is my favourite book ever and I could read it once a week. 

The exception to the rereading rule is Slaughterhouse 5, which I found too harrowing to read again. That&#039;s an incredible, horrible book. I have everything Vonnegut wrote and everything else is very well thumbed.  The Once and Future King is similar - I can only reread it when I have gotten over the trauma of the last time! I am currently nearly at the end of the unabridged audiobook and it has had me having to turn it off in the car because it was making me cry. 

I also turn to YA fantasy for comfort reading - as well as Victorian ghost stories and Agatha Christie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also reread everything &#8211; if I read something once and know I&#8217;m not going to read it again, it goes off to the charity shop. (Or the recycling bag, in the case of Twilight, which I read the first half of before all the kerfuffle about it and was inspired by such violent rage that I wasn&#8217;t going to charity shop it because I refused to be responsible for anyone else reading it!)</p>
<p>I read Catch-22 probably four times a year, Fire and Hemlock (Diana Wynne Jones) is my favourite book ever and I could read it once a week. </p>
<p>The exception to the rereading rule is Slaughterhouse 5, which I found too harrowing to read again. That&#8217;s an incredible, horrible book. I have everything Vonnegut wrote and everything else is very well thumbed.  The Once and Future King is similar &#8211; I can only reread it when I have gotten over the trauma of the last time! I am currently nearly at the end of the unabridged audiobook and it has had me having to turn it off in the car because it was making me cry. </p>
<p>I also turn to YA fantasy for comfort reading &#8211; as well as Victorian ghost stories and Agatha Christie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArisEile</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/comment-page-1/#comment-78366</link>
		<dc:creator>ArisEile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21676#comment-78366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love rereading Tamora Pierce and the Amber Spyglass by Philip Pullman. They never get old....

On the not-getting-at-a-certain-age-but-rereading-when-older note, for me it was Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison. I hated it when I read it for AP English in high school; re-read it three years later just for funsies and was blown away. Totally was not understanding critical race dialogue at the time, so makes sense the genius flew right over my head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love rereading Tamora Pierce and the Amber Spyglass by Philip Pullman. They never get old&#8230;.</p>
<p>On the not-getting-at-a-certain-age-but-rereading-when-older note, for me it was Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison. I hated it when I read it for AP English in high school; re-read it three years later just for funsies and was blown away. Totally was not understanding critical race dialogue at the time, so makes sense the genius flew right over my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wondering</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/comment-page-1/#comment-78349</link>
		<dc:creator>wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21676#comment-78349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I re-read all the books I own. If I&#039;m not going to re-read it, I don&#039;t keep it. I suppose I miss out on good books that, if read at a different point in my life would really touch me, but I can&#039;t bring myself to pick up a book a second time if I hated it the first. Lord of the Flies, I&#039;m looking at you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I re-read all the books I own. If I&#8217;m not going to re-read it, I don&#8217;t keep it. I suppose I miss out on good books that, if read at a different point in my life would really touch me, but I can&#8217;t bring myself to pick up a book a second time if I hated it the first. Lord of the Flies, I&#8217;m looking at you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elibard</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/comment-page-1/#comment-78344</link>
		<dc:creator>elibard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21676#comment-78344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried to read Northanger Abbey a few times as a teenager, and never liked it. Read it again after college, and adored it. I wholeheartedly agree with the idea that many books read best during a specific time in your life. I loved the Nancy Drew series as a kid, until I read one that made me angry (how could Nancy Drew become an expert ballet dancer in just a few weeks and star in the show, when I&#039;d been studying it for years and &amp; hadn&#039;t been able to do that??). So that ruined it for me and I never read another one. I have been thinking lately, though, that it might be fun to return to some of the original 10 books in the series.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to read Northanger Abbey a few times as a teenager, and never liked it. Read it again after college, and adored it. I wholeheartedly agree with the idea that many books read best during a specific time in your life. I loved the Nancy Drew series as a kid, until I read one that made me angry (how could Nancy Drew become an expert ballet dancer in just a few weeks and star in the show, when I&#8217;d been studying it for years and &amp; hadn&#8217;t been able to do that??). So that ruined it for me and I never read another one. I have been thinking lately, though, that it might be fun to return to some of the original 10 books in the series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/comment-page-1/#comment-78339</link>
		<dc:creator>rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21676#comment-78339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never understood either of the Sound and the Fury or Turn of the Screw.

Becky and everyone this has been such a great thread.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understood either of the Sound and the Fury or Turn of the Screw.</p>
<p>Becky and everyone this has been such a great thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/comment-page-1/#comment-78337</link>
		<dc:creator>Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21676#comment-78337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a youngster I would reread the 3 Musketeers at least once every 2 months - I really like the way that initially the 3 of them would hang out and support each other, and that there was enough friendship to support the inclusion of D&#039;Artagnan in the group.

I didn&#039;t really like the depiction of the female characters when I reread it when I got older, and wished that there was like a 3 Musketeers but with the core 3 being women.. (women and swords, riding horseback, having adventures, wearing funny hats - I want to go to there!)

Other books I go back to and read a couple of times a year is the 18th brumaire of louis bonaparte (yes written by Karl Marx).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a youngster I would reread the 3 Musketeers at least once every 2 months &#8211; I really like the way that initially the 3 of them would hang out and support each other, and that there was enough friendship to support the inclusion of D&#8217;Artagnan in the group.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really like the depiction of the female characters when I reread it when I got older, and wished that there was like a 3 Musketeers but with the core 3 being women.. (women and swords, riding horseback, having adventures, wearing funny hats &#8211; I want to go to there!)</p>
<p>Other books I go back to and read a couple of times a year is the 18th brumaire of louis bonaparte (yes written by Karl Marx).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/comment-page-1/#comment-78330</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21676#comment-78330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My son is an English major, and I&#039;m trying to keep up with stuff he&#039;s reading, and I&#039;ve now tried to read the Sound and Fury by Faulkner.  It took 3 times to even understand what was going on.  Then I tried Turn of the Screw, and that took a couple as well.  So, rereading for some like me is necessary just to get the story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My son is an English major, and I&#8217;m trying to keep up with stuff he&#8217;s reading, and I&#8217;ve now tried to read the Sound and Fury by Faulkner.  It took 3 times to even understand what was going on.  Then I tried Turn of the Screw, and that took a couple as well.  So, rereading for some like me is necessary just to get the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parrotchic</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2011/12/04/is-reading-better-the-second-or-third-or-fourth-time-around/comment-page-1/#comment-78311</link>
		<dc:creator>parrotchic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 03:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21676#comment-78311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Ms M ~ If you like Sherri Tepper (me too!) may I suggest &quot;Califia&#039;s Daughters&quot; by Laurie R King writing as Leigh Richards. It&#039;s a brilliant sci-fi feminist story. Also if you like YA, &quot;The Host&quot; by Stephanie Meyer is a great YA sci-fi book and nothing at all like the Twilight series.

Re-reading can be a lot of fun, soothing, and an eye opening experience. I&#039;ve recently been re-reading most of Tony Hillerman&#039;s booklist, which I first read 15-20 years ago. I&#039;ve forgotten whodunnit for most of them so it&#039;s like catching up with an old friend I haven&#039;t seen in a while. My recently discovered guilty pleasure is fan fiction ~ mostly ok, some cringe worthy, and a rare bit is absolutely brilliant and hard to believe it&#039;s done by amateurs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ms M ~ If you like Sherri Tepper (me too!) may I suggest &#8220;Califia&#8217;s Daughters&#8221; by Laurie R King writing as Leigh Richards. It&#8217;s a brilliant sci-fi feminist story. Also if you like YA, &#8220;The Host&#8221; by Stephanie Meyer is a great YA sci-fi book and nothing at all like the Twilight series.</p>
<p>Re-reading can be a lot of fun, soothing, and an eye opening experience. I&#8217;ve recently been re-reading most of Tony Hillerman&#8217;s booklist, which I first read 15-20 years ago. I&#8217;ve forgotten whodunnit for most of them so it&#8217;s like catching up with an old friend I haven&#8217;t seen in a while. My recently discovered guilty pleasure is fan fiction ~ mostly ok, some cringe worthy, and a rare bit is absolutely brilliant and hard to believe it&#8217;s done by amateurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
