logo

search

  • Home
  • About the Harpies
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
delete
bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Friday Fun Thread: What’s In A Name?

Posted by BeckySharper in Friday Fun Thread, Stereotypes on Jan 13, 2012, 8:00am | 16 comments

From MSN I picked up a thought-provoking blogpost based on an article that originally ran in the Daily Mail (your reliable source of “news”, confessionals, fluff, and not-so-subtle misogyny). But this one caught my eye because we’ve talked about our names and naming trends before, and everyone had something to say.

From the blogpost:

Researchers at Humboldt University in Berlin sent email messages containing only names, ages and zipcodes (no pictures) to 47,000 British online dating members and found that certain names were much more likely to receive clicks than others. According to the study’s leader, Jochen Gebauer, “Mails sent from an Alexander were clicked on 102 percent more times than those from a Kevin.”

“Single people would seem to prefer to remain alone than meet up with someone called Kevin or Chantal,” he added. Yikes.

As I look at it, there are two major caveats: First, this study was conducted in the UK where names tend to have stronger class associations. Two, the way that dating sites are set up, you don’t usually know the person’s name until after the first initial contact. This study looks at given names, not usernames. Regardless, maybe there is something to the way we subconsciously react to names?

To recap, here are the names you should name your children if you want them to find love online: Jacob, Alexander, Charlotte, Emma, Hannah, Max, Marie, Peter, Mark. Here are the names you shouldn’t name you children if you want them to be accepted on British dating sites: Kevin, Justin, Marvin, Dennis, Mandy, Celina, Chantal, Jacqueline.

I’m sure this probably holds true somewhat in the US, too. Names can wave a red flag to racists; just ask someone named Latoya or Jamal. And I’d argue that there are still some prejudices about names that don’t sound “classy,” like Kandi or Tammy or Shawn. Even religion comes into play: I once had a friend meet a dude on-line who when he discovered her name—Christine—said he could never date her because he was Jewish and “couldn’t be with a woman who was named for Jesus Christ.” (Yeah, we rolled our eyes at that, too.)

What do you think? Are some names turn-ons or turn-offs? Have you ever been rejected outright for having the wrong name? Would a name turn you on or off someone, sight unseen? Is there a name that the man or woman of your dreams just couldn’t have? (Adolf would probably do it for me. Or Newt.)

16 Responses to “Friday Fun Thread: What’s In A Name?”

  1. Plum-Pie says:
    January 13, 2012 at 8:09 am

    A long time ago, I turned down a night of passion with a beautiful young man because he had the same name as my dad. (I should never have asked.)

  2. bookworm81 says:
    January 13, 2012 at 9:18 am

    I don’t have any experience with other dating websites but on e-Harmony (where I met my husband) you do see your matches’ first names right away. There was one name that I just couldn’t respond to. It wasn’t that there was anything wrong with the name itself, it’s just that both of my older sisters are married to guys named Steve (Stephen) and I as a result I couldn’t bring myself to date someone with that name.

    Plus, if I had married someone named Steve that would have put enormous pressure on our youngest sister to find yet another Steve ;)

  3. annimal says:
    January 13, 2012 at 9:48 am

    I went through a Bob phase, then a Steve phase, then a ‘dudes who go by their middle name’ phase.
    I think the only name that would be a huge turnoff would be Vince – I had a very annoying boss by that name once.

  4. Drahill says:
    January 13, 2012 at 10:50 am

    I tried online dating once. Never again. Try convincing a man online that you have a male-centric name and you are 1.) in fact, female and 2.) not a lesbian. People equate the name with the qualities of the person.

  5. PhDork says:
    January 13, 2012 at 11:09 am

    Not that I’m online dating, but based on my experience, dudes named Jeff will be sexy, flattering assholes, and I will pine for Chads who never requite my affection.

  6. bookworm81 says:
    January 13, 2012 at 12:47 pm

    @PhDork – my first crush was on a Chad! Sadly he liked my best friend better (we were only 5 so this was less dramatic than it sounds).

  7. Es says:
    January 13, 2012 at 1:24 pm

    I am 100% dudes with four-letter names (or the abbreviation that they go by), so far. Which is weird.

    Despite never being one to call out someone’s name in the throes, I am a bit of a snob about people having a name that is call-outable without losing the moment and dissolving into giggles…

    I do have aversions to names belonging to people I don’t like. I used to know an awful Lexy and the name Alexia is forever tainted!

  8. Ms. M says:
    January 13, 2012 at 3:57 pm

    I don’t have a problem with many names, esp. unusual ones are beautiful, but Larry, Vince, Candy, and Tiffany make the hairs on on my neck stand up.

  9. pilker says:
    January 13, 2012 at 5:37 pm

    I have a predisposition to like anyone with a warm two-syllable old-fashioned somewhat working class name of Howard, Roger, or Walter. I have no idea why.

    Anyone named Steve starts with a deficit; every one I’ve known has been… a problem.

  10. annajcook says:
    January 13, 2012 at 6:52 pm

    Well, Hanna and I get regular comments about the similarity and Hanna admits she worried we might never get together because our names were too similar …

  11. Susan says:
    January 13, 2012 at 7:15 pm

    I certainly have names that lose points by association. For example, I have yet to meet a Gavin that didn’t make me want to roll my eyes. Other than names with poor associations I’m just 100% with Es. It’s got to sound good in bed! This is actually a problem with my current sweetie, who might end up being my spouse… so we’ll see.

  12. BeckySharper says:
    January 14, 2012 at 11:52 am

    In college I dated six guys in a row named Chris or Kris. Christopher must have been the #1 name given to baby boys in the early 70s. Hey, at least if I yelled out my ex’s name in the throes of passion…

    One of my girlfriends dated a guy whose name was Earth (he had some hippie-dippie parents). She reported that it took some getting used to.

    @Anna: I have friends who are a (hetero) couple who are named Karol and Carol. They joke about it, but she deliberately kept her own last name when they married because she foresaw a bureaucratic nightmare if they had the same last name and merged finances, etc.

  13. C says:
    January 15, 2012 at 4:32 am

    Isn’t there a chapter about American naming conventions in Freakonomics? IIRC, usually the rich come up with a name, then it filters down to the middle class, and from there the lower classes pick up on it.

  14. Suzanne says:
    January 15, 2012 at 4:06 pm

    @PhDork and bookworm81 – My first crush in school was also Chad. He did not feel the same.

    I had a middle school boyfriend named Fred that I knew could never turn into True Love because….Fred.

    The whole conversation reminds me of When Harry Met Sally. Do me big Sheldon!

  15. emilyanne says:
    January 15, 2012 at 7:30 pm

    As a Brit I have a problem with surnames as first names – Travis, Taylor, Jackson, Carson etc, I’ve just always found them a bit odd.

    I actually am not at all fond of my husband’s name but found that that was irrelevant when I came to marry him. (Come to think of it I didn’t like my long term boyfriend prior to my husband’s name much either)

    I love my son’s name but it’s Irish and confuses the hell out of most people in the US so I do occasionally regret it.

    In my life I have been out with an awful lot of Ciarans, Daves, Euans and Patricks for some reason.

  16. Mackey says:
    January 20, 2012 at 2:12 am

    The male name “Nigel” just conjures up the childhood taunt “Nigel No-Friends”..
    The female name “Monica”.. I dated a big bag of drama in the shape of person called “Monica”.. that name takes me back there..

    so the names Monica and Nigel would be the only time I judged by people by their names and not the content of their character. (Though those other names listed in the article certainly have the potential to do that as well.)

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

 

random posts

Sodom and Gomorrah and Uniban...
Today is Blog for Choice Day!...
The Matchmaker: An Overshare...

recent comments

  • Matthew: I can offer one small defense of the original poster. If you...
  • Rebecca: I am a woman and I love wearing heels. The pain of them is b...
  • Jason: I agree for the most part, but the point at which I take iss...
  • Mr. Nice Guy: "Genuinely nice guys have nothing to worry about. Genuinely ...
  • Jill: Thank you for the truth. Now i know im doing the right thing...
  • Nikki: Thank you so much for this. Im going to have a medical ab do...

Tags

Abortion Activism Anger Anti-feminists Assweasels Beauty Culture Books Busybodies Children Choosing Your Choice Double Standards Education Empowerfulment Fashion Fat Is A Feminist Issue Feminism Great Male Narcissists Ladylike Endeavors LGBTQ Marriage Masculinity Misogyny Motherhood Overshare Poetry Saturday Politics Race Racism Rants Relationships Religion Reproductive rights Sex Sexism Sexual violence So-Called Self-Improvement Stereotypes The Media Theory and Practice Things That Are Awesome Unexpected Consequences Violence against women and girls Women's Health Women's Work Work Administrative Professionals Day (2)
Anonymous Prosecutor (4)
Culcha Vulcha (54)
Discussion Time (9)
Feminist Food for Thought (55)
Friday Fun Thread (95)
Guest Post (49)
Harpy Book Club (64)
Harpy Cinematical Society (19)
Harpy Droppings (2)
Harpy Hall of Fame (27)
Harpy Periodical (3)
Harpy Seminar (29)
Harpy Shout-out (63)
Harpy Televisual Society (4)
Heard (7)
Help Me Harpies! (20)
Honorary Harpies (18)
Housekeeping (37)
International Museum of Women (1)
Language Matters (25)
Let's Talk Images (5)
Linkaround (27)
LOL (5)
Morning Snark (49)
Poetry Saturdays (6)
Reader Request (17)
Retro Pleasures (13)
Solo Flying (66)
Thoughts (1212)
Thursday Night Trivia (11)
Wednesday Whiplash (1)
You Have Got To Be Fucking Kidding Me (139)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.

Blogroll

  • A Truly Elegant Mess
  • Bitch
  • Bookslut
  • Deeply Problematic
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • F Bomb
  • Feminist Law Professors
  • Feminist Philosophers
  • Feministe
  • Feministing
  • Fugitivus
  • FWD/Forward
  • Geek Feminism
  • gudbuy t'jane
  • Hoyden About Town
  • Hysteria!
  • I Blame the Patriarchy
  • Jezebel
  • Kate Harding’s Shapely Prose
  • Katha Pollitt
  • Like a Whisper
  • Maud Newton
  • Pandagon
  • Racialicious
  • Rage Against the Man-chine
  • Salon’s Broadsheet
  • Shakesville
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Angry Black Woman
  • The Crunk Feminist Collective
  • The Curvature
  • The F Word
  • The Feminist Agenda
  • The Feminist Texican
  • Tiger Beatdown
  • Womanist Musings

Archives

  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

Search

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN
  • WordPress

google

google

.

Copyright © 2013. Creative Commons License
The Pursuit of Harpyness is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes

The harpy art you see in our banner above is by Ursula Dodge. Visit her etsy store!