<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Talk Images: &#8220;Single By Choice&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/2012/01/26/lets-talk-images-single-by-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2012/01/26/lets-talk-images-single-by-choice/</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2012/01/26/lets-talk-images-single-by-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-81644</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21906#comment-81644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking closely at the picture, the edge of her left arm is visible all the way down to her breast, suggesting that she simply has it positioned diagonally behind her. It is certainly posed - and the pose was probably further Photoshopped, but I don&#039;t think the intention was to present her as having one arm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking closely at the picture, the edge of her left arm is visible all the way down to her breast, suggesting that she simply has it positioned diagonally behind her. It is certainly posed &#8211; and the pose was probably further Photoshopped, but I don&#8217;t think the intention was to present her as having one arm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacki</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2012/01/26/lets-talk-images-single-by-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-81562</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21906#comment-81562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who noticed the woman has only one arm? I wonder if it was photoshopped out to show her life is missing something.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who noticed the woman has only one arm? I wonder if it was photoshopped out to show her life is missing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2012/01/26/lets-talk-images-single-by-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-81520</link>
		<dc:creator>Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21906#comment-81520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[definitely agree with the &quot;non-conformity in small dose&quot; sentiment..
but it also interesting to see that the woman depicted is educated, would appear to be in the middle/upper class, and appears to have a career.
It is almost like this woman becomes the &quot;poster-singleton&quot; for non-married heterosexual women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely agree with the &#8220;non-conformity in small dose&#8221; sentiment..<br />
but it also interesting to see that the woman depicted is educated, would appear to be in the middle/upper class, and appears to have a career.<br />
It is almost like this woman becomes the &#8220;poster-singleton&#8221; for non-married heterosexual women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2012/01/26/lets-talk-images-single-by-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-81459</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21906#comment-81459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to chime in and say that this was also featured on another recent magazine cover (this time on the cover of The Atlantic) as written by another late-30s, single, conventionally attractive, and white woman. That article does touch briefly on singledom among women of other ethnicities. However, I should warn that the other article is off base in a few areas. For instance, stating that &quot;women are increasingly confronted with deadbeats and players&quot; is, at very best, reductionist.

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/11/all-the-single-ladies/8654/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to chime in and say that this was also featured on another recent magazine cover (this time on the cover of The Atlantic) as written by another late-30s, single, conventionally attractive, and white woman. That article does touch briefly on singledom among women of other ethnicities. However, I should warn that the other article is off base in a few areas. For instance, stating that &#8220;women are increasingly confronted with deadbeats and players&#8221; is, at very best, reductionist.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/11/all-the-single-ladies/8654/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/11/all-the-single-ladies/8654/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annajcook</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2012/01/26/lets-talk-images-single-by-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-81458</link>
		<dc:creator>annajcook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21906#comment-81458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@JT there you go, again, adding to my reading list :)!

@BeckySharper, yeah, I agree about the way in which conventional beauty works in this image to counter our notions of what Single Women Look Like -- as in, it must be their fault for being so unattractive and/or dykey as to not catch a man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JT there you go, again, adding to my reading list <img src='http://www.harpyness.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> !</p>
<p>@BeckySharper, yeah, I agree about the way in which conventional beauty works in this image to counter our notions of what Single Women Look Like &#8212; as in, it must be their fault for being so unattractive and/or dykey as to not catch a man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Tychonievich</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2012/01/26/lets-talk-images-single-by-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-81455</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Tychonievich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21906#comment-81455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sort of related, did you see this interesting interview about a new book about solitary living on a broad scale?
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/Eric-Klinenberg-on-Going-Solo.html?c=y&amp;page=1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sort of related, did you see this interesting interview about a new book about solitary living on a broad scale?<br />
<a href="http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/Eric-Klinenberg-on-Going-Solo.html?c=y&#038;page=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/Eric-Klinenberg-on-Going-Solo.html?c=y&#038;page=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeckySharper</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2012/01/26/lets-talk-images-single-by-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-81454</link>
		<dc:creator>BeckySharper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=21906#comment-81454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve certainly gotten plenty of comments, some of them intended to be &quot;helpful&quot;, some of them not, about the fact that I&#039;m single, successful, and unmarried. 

A sampler:

&lt;em&gt; &quot;Oh, don&#039;t worry. You&#039;re still young.&quot; &lt;/em&gt; Because if you&#039;re not married by the time you&#039;re &quot;old&quot;, that&#039;s cause for worry. Let&#039;s just say at 36, I hear this one less often than I did in my twenties, because NOW it&#039;s supposed to be time for me to worry. 

&lt;em&gt; &quot;At your age, maybe you should be a little less picky?&quot; &lt;/em&gt; This one reliably makes my head explode. Because women, unlike men, don&#039;t have the right to insist that they to get what they want or need from a relationship---they should be willing to downgrade their own needs/desires in order to meet society&#039;s standards. And, of course, as I become less youthful and therefore less attractive, I have even less right to insist on what I need. (Also, no one ever tells men this, for obvious reasons).

And my personal favorite, courtesy of DaddySharper: &lt;em&gt; &quot;Maybe your standards are too high?&quot; &lt;/em&gt; Of course, they&#039;re not standards if they&#039;re too low, so this is just a variant of the &quot;too picky&quot; criticism. Parents---and the rest of the world---should encourage women to choose unmarried happiness and personal fulfillment over simply getting married. Yes, my father really said this to me...even loving parents  will occasionally regurgitate negative cultural stereotypes about marriage and women.

I do think Anna&#039;s dead right by pointing out that this image represents non-conformity in a small dose. Obviously, the woman pictured doesn&#039;t represent the diversity of unmarried women in our society. Still, I think the fact the woman depicted is slim and conventionally attractive is meant to overturn our preconceived notion---well, our Patriarchial society&#039;s preconceived notion---that a good-looking woman will always get married because the whole purpose of female beauty is to attract  men and get them to put a ring on your finger. And I think anything that pokes holes in that preconceived notion is a positive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve certainly gotten plenty of comments, some of them intended to be &#8220;helpful&#8221;, some of them not, about the fact that I&#8217;m single, successful, and unmarried. </p>
<p>A sampler:</p>
<p><em> &#8220;Oh, don&#8217;t worry. You&#8217;re still young.&#8221; </em> Because if you&#8217;re not married by the time you&#8217;re &#8220;old&#8221;, that&#8217;s cause for worry. Let&#8217;s just say at 36, I hear this one less often than I did in my twenties, because NOW it&#8217;s supposed to be time for me to worry. </p>
<p><em> &#8220;At your age, maybe you should be a little less picky?&#8221; </em> This one reliably makes my head explode. Because women, unlike men, don&#8217;t have the right to insist that they to get what they want or need from a relationship&#8212;they should be willing to downgrade their own needs/desires in order to meet society&#8217;s standards. And, of course, as I become less youthful and therefore less attractive, I have even less right to insist on what I need. (Also, no one ever tells men this, for obvious reasons).</p>
<p>And my personal favorite, courtesy of DaddySharper: <em> &#8220;Maybe your standards are too high?&#8221; </em> Of course, they&#8217;re not standards if they&#8217;re too low, so this is just a variant of the &#8220;too picky&#8221; criticism. Parents&#8212;and the rest of the world&#8212;should encourage women to choose unmarried happiness and personal fulfillment over simply getting married. Yes, my father really said this to me&#8230;even loving parents  will occasionally regurgitate negative cultural stereotypes about marriage and women.</p>
<p>I do think Anna&#8217;s dead right by pointing out that this image represents non-conformity in a small dose. Obviously, the woman pictured doesn&#8217;t represent the diversity of unmarried women in our society. Still, I think the fact the woman depicted is slim and conventionally attractive is meant to overturn our preconceived notion&#8212;well, our Patriarchial society&#8217;s preconceived notion&#8212;that a good-looking woman will always get married because the whole purpose of female beauty is to attract  men and get them to put a ring on your finger. And I think anything that pokes holes in that preconceived notion is a positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
