logo

search

  • Home
  • About the Harpies
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
delete
bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

“have a moment for gay rights?”

Posted by annajcook in Language Matters, Thoughts, Activism, Awkward Conversations, Citizenship, Heteronormativity, Politics on Apr 12, 2012, 8:00am | 5 comments
via ACLU

Last week outside Trader Joe’s I was accosted by charity muggers from the ACLU. 

This happens regularly in Coolidge Corner and I generally ignore them across the board. I make it a rule not to support any organization via street harassment, even if they’re a group with a mission I support. (And yes, I have, in fact, been a card-carrying member of the ACLU when personal finances allow).

But anyway. Last Wednesday was the day the federal appeals court in Boston heard oral arguments against the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). And the chipper young woman in the ACLU vest was asking passers-by if they had “a moment for gay rights?” so I thought perhaps they had some sort of petition to sign vis a vis the whole DOMA-is-stupid-not-to-mention-unconstitutional thing. So after the internal debate while grocery shopping (“you should just suck it up, self, and be a good citizen and a social person for once”) I actually stopped on my way out of the store and volunteered to hear what she was about.

“So do you have a petition you want me to sign or something?” I asked.

She seemed surprised I was even stopping, but gathered herself together and launched into what the ACLU was about, as an organization, and specifically some of the things they were doing to support queer folks who’d been discriminated against because of their sexuality. It turned out she didn’t have any sort of petition to sign, but was just trawling for donations.

“I’m asking people to make a donation of $29 dollars today for each of the twenty-nine states where it’s legal to discriminate against someone due to their sexual orientation!” she wrapped up with a note of breathless relief in her voice that I’d actually let her finish a thought.

“Well, I don’t give out my financial information on the street,” I tried to break it to her gently, “But I’ll definitely keep you guys in mind.”

“But you’re behind what we stand for, right?” She asked, anxiously.

“Um –sure!” I said, shook her hand politely, and headed off down the street.

It took me most of the walk home to realize what was the most frustrating and surreal part of the interaction. It was that the young woman in question was pitching her persuasive skills at someone she presumed to be straight. Did I stand for “gay rights”? Well, yeah, actually, I’m pretty into having equal civil rights. The whole reason I’d stopped to speak with her in the first place was that I’d been thinking about DOMA that day. Because the fate of the Defense of Marriage Act has a direct effect on my life. Because Hanna and I are talking about getting married and even though we can do that perfectly legally here in the state of Massachusetts, as far as the federal government is concerned (taxes, social security benefits, etc.) we won’t be a family unit.

So I’m not behind the idea of “gay rights” as this abstract great-good-thing that all card-carrying members of the ACLU should, you know, be in support of because it’s the right thing to do. (Though I’m behind it for that reason too). I’m actually in support of it because it’s about my equality of personhood before the law.


I’m not pissed at the young woman I spoke with (well, not much). She’s getting paid probably minimum wage (if she’s getting paid at all) to stand on the pavement and harass people at rush hour for what is probably an incredibly, incredibly low rate of return. And I’m sure whatever job training she received was cursory at best.

But I do find it note-worthy that the ACLU spiel is constructed in such a way that assumes the person to whom the spiel is pitched is outside the group of interest. I think I would have been less irritated by the encounter if I’d been told, “Here’s what we’re doing to support your right to equal protection under the law, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.” If you’re standing on a street corner flagging people down, you can’t actually tell whether they’re gay or lesbian, bi or poly, trans, genderqueer, or otherwise. Whether their sexual practices put them at risk of arrest, whether they’re afraid to us public restrooms, or whether they’ve got two partners waiting at home, only one of whom they could legally marry — even in the state of Massachusetts.

So a tip to all you charity muggers out there? Keep in mind when you ask the question, “Are you for gay rights?” The chances are at least one in ten (more of you count family members of queer folks who identify as straight) that the person you’re talking to isn’t a supporter of gay rights ’cause it’s a trendy liberal cause, but because it actually has an effect on their quality of life.

I’d say, just assume everyone’s queer until proven otherwise. It might actually up your success rate.

Cross-posted at the feminist librarian.

5 Responses to ““have a moment for gay rights?””

  1. Ms. M says:
    April 12, 2012 at 2:48 pm

    This is true for a lot of charity things. For one, I have RA (technically JRA), and every year I get all these fundraising mailers for the “run for arthritis” things. They assume that the people participating will not be those with the disease, but “loved ones”. Because who the hell with RA can “run” or be someplace at 7:30am?

    Each time I’m at the grocery store this month, I get asked at the little card swipe screen if I want to donate money to help those with disabilities (it goes to special olympics). I donate each time, and the cahier is all THANK YOU for your VERY GENEROUS DONATION (I do $5 each time). I say “my son DOES special olympics” (he has high functioning autism) and they are all shocked. Of course it is those “other” people who participate in “that” sort of thing.

    Anyway, not to diminish to LGBT canvassing, but I just needed to vent on this subject how it relates to invisible disability as well.

  2. annajcook says:
    April 12, 2012 at 3:33 pm

    Anyway, not to diminish to LGBT canvassing, but I just needed to vent on this subject how it relates to invisible disability as well.

    Not at all, Ms. M! I don’t like playing oppression olympics (what my mother used to call the game of “my pain is more exquisite than your pain!”) … and I absolutely think this observation has wider applicability than gay rights.

    My supervisor at work has MS, another invisible disability (at least in her case). I know people who have chronic physical issues which aren’t “written on the body” in a way that makes it obvious to passersby. They get all sorts of push-back when they, for example, take a seat on the subway during rush hour (looking outwardly young and healthy).

    The other way I notice these social cues and privilege issues intersecting around charity is in the class-coding around arts and culture activities and income. My partner and I both work in institutions dependent on generous private donations, and as young, white professionals we blend into this weird demographic in Boston that’s assumed to be part of the rising monied class — even though we’re professionals in a field where we’re lucky to be making $35K/year. Yet the language of solicitations for charity giving assumes a level of discretionary spending we don’t have (and an absence of need for public services which we rely on). It’s really fascinating (when it’s not maddening).

  3. Skada says:
    April 13, 2012 at 11:36 am

    I’m so glad you posted this, Anna.

    I get this a lot, especially because I get read as female (despite being genderqueer) and read as straight (because my partner identifies as male). So even though I have several layers of queer identities relating to my orientation and gender, I’m frequently invisibilized in almost all settings. (And yeah, it stings even worse when I get it from other queers in queer spaces.)

    To me, it feels like an unintentional erasure. Like I don’t look the part enough or something. Like even if I wore a “Legalize Trans*” t-shirt and fifteen rainbow bracelets, people would still assume I’m an ally.

    And there’s nothing wrong with being an ally, but I just feel like I shouldn’t have comply with absurd stereotypes just to be recognized as a member of my own community.

    I like your suggestion to make the conversation about how these measures (such as ending DOMA) advocate for everyone’s well-being and equality.

  4. Es says:
    April 13, 2012 at 3:42 pm

    I get it from ‘I’m not racist but…’ people. I’m mixed race (half Iranian) but look white – the amount of people who make shocking remarks, particularly since 9/11 and then the London bombings, is just appalling. Even if I were white, it wouldn’t be OK to say those things in front of me.

  5. Mackey says:
    April 13, 2012 at 11:05 pm

    I don’t remember who initially said it, “don’t assume, it makes an ass out of u and me”.. this seems to be good advice..

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

 

random posts

Tim Gunn: It Gets Better...
Plus ça change…...
Blog For Choice Day: Are You Concerned?...

recent comments

  • Matthew: I can offer one small defense of the original poster. If you...
  • Rebecca: I am a woman and I love wearing heels. The pain of them is b...
  • Jason: I agree for the most part, but the point at which I take iss...
  • Mr. Nice Guy: "Genuinely nice guys have nothing to worry about. Genuinely ...
  • Jill: Thank you for the truth. Now i know im doing the right thing...
  • Nikki: Thank you so much for this. Im going to have a medical ab do...

Tags

Abortion Activism Anger Anti-feminists Assweasels Beauty Culture Books Busybodies Children Choosing Your Choice Double Standards Education Empowerfulment Fashion Fat Is A Feminist Issue Feminism Great Male Narcissists Ladylike Endeavors LGBTQ Marriage Masculinity Misogyny Motherhood Overshare Poetry Saturday Politics Race Racism Rants Relationships Religion Reproductive rights Sex Sexism Sexual violence So-Called Self-Improvement Stereotypes The Media Theory and Practice Things That Are Awesome Unexpected Consequences Violence against women and girls Women's Health Women's Work Work Administrative Professionals Day (2)
Anonymous Prosecutor (4)
Culcha Vulcha (54)
Discussion Time (9)
Feminist Food for Thought (55)
Friday Fun Thread (95)
Guest Post (49)
Harpy Book Club (64)
Harpy Cinematical Society (19)
Harpy Droppings (2)
Harpy Hall of Fame (27)
Harpy Periodical (3)
Harpy Seminar (29)
Harpy Shout-out (63)
Harpy Televisual Society (4)
Heard (7)
Help Me Harpies! (20)
Honorary Harpies (18)
Housekeeping (37)
International Museum of Women (1)
Language Matters (25)
Let's Talk Images (5)
Linkaround (27)
LOL (5)
Morning Snark (49)
Poetry Saturdays (6)
Reader Request (17)
Retro Pleasures (13)
Solo Flying (66)
Thoughts (1212)
Thursday Night Trivia (11)
Wednesday Whiplash (1)
You Have Got To Be Fucking Kidding Me (139)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.

Blogroll

  • A Truly Elegant Mess
  • Bitch
  • Bookslut
  • Deeply Problematic
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • F Bomb
  • Feminist Law Professors
  • Feminist Philosophers
  • Feministe
  • Feministing
  • Fugitivus
  • FWD/Forward
  • Geek Feminism
  • gudbuy t'jane
  • Hoyden About Town
  • Hysteria!
  • I Blame the Patriarchy
  • Jezebel
  • Kate Harding’s Shapely Prose
  • Katha Pollitt
  • Like a Whisper
  • Maud Newton
  • Pandagon
  • Racialicious
  • Rage Against the Man-chine
  • Salon’s Broadsheet
  • Shakesville
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Angry Black Woman
  • The Crunk Feminist Collective
  • The Curvature
  • The F Word
  • The Feminist Agenda
  • The Feminist Texican
  • Tiger Beatdown
  • Womanist Musings

Archives

  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

Search

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN
  • WordPress

google

google

.

Copyright © 2013. Creative Commons License
The Pursuit of Harpyness is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes

The harpy art you see in our banner above is by Ursula Dodge. Visit her etsy store!