<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Pursuit of Harpyness &#187; Marriage Equality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/tag/marriage-equality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California LOVE!</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/08/04/california-love-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/08/04/california-love-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 23:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PhDork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Things That Are Awesome]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=16508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must live in one of the queer-friendliest bubbles in the world, since fully 75% of the most recent Facebook status updates, email-blasts, and general blah-blah in my world is swirling around the absofuckinglutely brilliant judgment out of California, overturning the hateful Proposition 8, which attempted to limit marriage to straight couples. Chief U.S. District [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.harpyness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/gay_rights_sign_by_The_Enabler.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-16517" title="gay_rights_sign_by_The_Enabler" src="http://www.harpyness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/gay_rights_sign_by_The_Enabler-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>I must live in one of the queer-friendliest bubbles in the world, since fully 75% of the most recent Facebook status updates, email-blasts, and general blah-blah in my world is swirling around the absofuckinglutely brilliant judgment out of California, overturning the hateful Proposition 8, which attempted to limit marriage to straight couples.</p>
<p>Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker is the man of the hour, laying it out in no uncertain terms that the ban on SSM violates Constitutional rights to due process and equal protection under the law, while failing &#8220;to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license.&#8221;</p>
<p>Prop 8 assholes will be mounting an appeal, of course, but frankly, it isn&#8217;t looking good for them.  <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/04/proposition-8-overturned_n_670739.html">This HuffPo article</a> noted that two high-profile California pols, the Governator and AG Jerry Brown, who previously douched out and supported the measure, refused to speak on its behalf during the most recent hearings.   And check out <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/135764/Americans-Acceptance-Gay-Relations-Crosses-Threshold.aspx">this Gallup Poll</a> from May of this year.</p>
<p>History and logic and no-foolin&#8217; right-ness is on our side.  Cheers to Judge Walker, the couples who brought the challenge, and all my queer peeps, married, wanna-be married, and don&#8217;t-wanna-be-married.  Equality NOW!</p>
<p>Read more, and see some great photos<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/08/04/california.same.sex.ruling/index.html?hpt=T1&amp;iref=BN1"> at CNN</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harpyness.com/2010/08/04/california-love-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unmarried to Each Other*</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/12/08/unmarried-to-each-other/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/12/08/unmarried-to-each-other/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PhDork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solo Flying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life with a Dude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been lots of news&#8211;mostly bad&#8211;about the fight for marriage equality in the States.**  Not only do I feel for my many friends who are prevented from legally wedding, I believe that institutionalizing same-sex marriage is crucial if we&#8217;re going to actually live our stated &#8220;and justice for all&#8221; values (the patriarchy-smashing aspect is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_12031" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-12031" title="3165439406_4429b68abb" src="http://www.harpyness.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/3165439406_4429b68abb-300x225.jpg" alt="Via Franco Folini @ Flickr." width="300" height="225" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Via Franco Folini @ Flickr.</p></div>
<p>There has been lots of news&#8211;mostly bad&#8211;about the fight for marriage equality in the States.**  Not only do I feel for my many friends who are prevented from legally wedding, I believe that institutionalizing same-sex marriage is crucial if we&#8217;re going to actually live our stated &#8220;and justice for all&#8221; values (the patriarchy-smashing aspect is good, too).</p>
<p>So why aren&#8217;t <em>I</em> married?  I&#8217;m always on about that Dude I live with, right?  We just celebrated our 12th Unniversary this weekend (if by &#8220;celebrated&#8221; you mean said &#8220;huh, twelve years&#8230;pretty crazy&#8217;&#8221;).  If I&#8217;m down with commitment, and I think the right to marry is so all-fired important for queer couples, why don&#8217;t I make it legal already?</p>
<p>I could jabber all day about why, but for your reading convenience, I&#8217;ll boil it down into three main reasons.  Walk down the aisle (of my thinking) with me.<span id="more-11842"></span></p>
<p>1.  I fucking hate weddings.  I have always hated weddings, even before a undergraduate research project on the Wedding Industrial Complex revealed how far reaching and insidious it is.  Even if you think marriage is nifty, weddings are insipid frippery; they have nothing to do with being in a relationship.  I hate the froofed-up  pretty princess aesthetic, I hate the Passing of the Woman from dad to dude, I hate all the things you &#8220;must&#8221; do, like have a guest book, and include your friends reading bad poetry, and make everyone do the Chicken Dance at the reception.  I hate that everyone&#8211;no, really, <em>everyone</em>&#8211;thinks that <em>their</em> wedding was totally original and personalized and equalicious, even though you could set your watch by the lighting of Unity Candles, and virginity fetishism is in full effect and jeezusgawd if I ever hear <em>Canon in D</em> again I will destroy the universe with my explosive scorn.  I may have just triggered one thousand defensive  &#8220;you&#8217;re  judging me!&#8221; comments, but so be it.  I&#8217;m glad you found a loving companion, but I fucking hate weddings.  Even yours.</p>
<p>2.  Though I am no libertarian (perish the thought!), I don&#8217;t like the idea that government or society-at-large gets to decide that certain relationships count more than others.  Even though I know there are all sorts of benefits to being married, I&#8217;m not interested in saying &#8220;well, before the twenteenth  of Smarch our relationship wasn&#8217;t <em>real</em> enough, but now the state of Missitucky says it&#8217;s okay for you to visit me in the hospital.&#8221;  That&#8217;s straight-up bullshit, and I&#8217;m grateful that more and more people are recognizing it as such.  Pilgrim Soul has written before about the privileging of hetero love-matches over all other relationships, and certainly we&#8217;ve heard from a number of our readers who, like me, are in permanent-but-not-licensed relationships (we are among the 12 million co-habiters in the US), as well as many who would welcome a &#8220;non-traditional&#8221; living arrangement, like our oft-mentioned Harpy House.  Just as [dad + mom + 2.3 kids + golden retriever]  is no guarantee of &#8220;family,&#8221; a marriage license is no guarantee of a mutuality or partnership.  (Neither is living together, of course.)</p>
<p>3.  And last of all, <em>I don&#8217;t want to be married</em>.  I really never have.  Despite cultural messages overwhelmingly to the contrary, I never daydreamed while growing up about a big rock, a white dress, or being whisked away by Mr. HisLastName.  I didn&#8217;t dream about finding my Other Half.  Hell, I didn&#8217;t even dream about being monogamous; I thought a small group of kind/hot/reliable boyfriends, none of whom lived with me, was the best option.  (The idea is still has its appeal.)  I didn&#8217;t&#8211;and don&#8217;t&#8211;want to be a wife, with all of the emotional baggage of that term.  I want to be a friend and a lover and a partner.</p>
<p>4.  (I lied.  There are four.)  I&#8217;m not religious, so the idea of asking for cosmic approval of my household arrangements is even more absurd than registering with my state.  I believe in the existence of the state, at least.  The fact is that most religious objection to both same-sex marriage and cohabitation is based on a serious case of obsessive panty-sniffing:  somewhere, someone is getting it on, and IT MUST BE STOPPED.  My reactionary streak makes me wanna go jump the Dude&#8217;s bones whenever I hear that.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">* * *</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t ever intend to marry, and that puts me in the minority of cohabitors.  Although I do get tired of answering The Question (I&#8217;ve stopped saying <em>anything</em> about my personal life to students, who, while surprisingly queer-friendly, are invariably shocked, if not scandalized, to think that marriage is not the goal of a relationship).  I don&#8217;t believe it would deepen my feelings for the Dude or enrich our life together.  To the contrary, it would make me feel like my relationship was no longer my own.  And if what benefits government and society is &#8220;stable committed relationships,&#8221; government and society might consider getting the hell out of my&#8211;and my queer friends&#8217;&#8211;way.</p>
<p>I leave you with some of the lyrics to a song that the Dude dug up for me a few years ago:  &#8220;Darling Annie,&#8221; by the still ass-kicking <a href="http://www.peggyseeger.com/">Peggy Seeger</a> (who typically performed it with her longtime love Ewan MacColl):</p>
<blockquote><p>EM:  If you marry me, I&#8217;ll give you everything I have;</p>
<p>You won&#8217;t ever need to earn a penny</p>
<p>I will be your man and the ring upon your hand</p>
<p>Will show the world that you&#8217;re my darling Annie.</p>
<p>PS:  Dearest love, I&#8217;ll be glad to add your wages onto mine</p>
<p>I can work and keep myself so handy;</p>
<p>You can be my man without a golden wedding band</p>
<p>For I&#8217;ll tell the world that I&#8217;m your Annie.</p>
<p>Chorus:</p>
<p>For it&#8217;s love, love will hold us, love is everything</p>
<p>Who could dream of anything that&#8217;s better?</p>
<p>Not the vow, not the string, not the golden wedding ring</p>
<p>Just you, love, you and me together.</p></blockquote>
<p>Damn, I&#8217;m such a softie.</p>
<p>*Title stolen from Dorian Solot and Marshall Miller.  The companion site to their book is <a href="http://www.unmarriedtoeachother.com/">here</a>.</p>
<p>**I&#8217;m hoping that New Jersey Senate gets this issue right before the repugnant Chris Christie takes over as governor next month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/12/08/unmarried-to-each-other/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maine in the Neck</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/04/maine-in-my-neck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/04/maine-in-my-neck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PhDork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assweasels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While BeckySharper had the occasion to report some good follow-up news, I have the distinct displeasure to follow up on yesterday&#8217;s elections.  Republican wins in Virginia and New Jersey are bad enough, but the real blow&#8211;at least to me and mine&#8211;is that Maine, which six months ago passed a same-sex marriage legislation through its Congress [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While BeckySharper had the occasion to report some good follow-up news, I have the distinct displeasure to follow up on yesterday&#8217;s elections.  Republican wins in Virginia and New Jersey are bad enough, but the real blow&#8211;at least to me and mine&#8211;is that Maine, which six months ago passed a same-sex marriage legislation through its Congress and had it signed by the <em>formerly</em>-bigoted Governor Baldacci, has now killed that legislation (and their progressive bona fides) through a popular vote.</p>
<p>ABC <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/maine-gay-marriage-law-repealed/story?id=8992720">reports</a> that 53% of voters came out against marriage equality, and now Maine is the 31st state to outlaw marriage for same-sex couples.</p>
<p>Goddammit, Maine, you&#8217;re going to make me sound, if only for a moment, like a crazy FoxNews commentator here talking about &#8220;the founding documents of this nation,&#8221; but for the love of lobsters, they clearly state that all citizens are created equal and merit equal treatment under the law (not the church).  There is no &#8220;except if a majority decides that a group of them don&#8217;t&#8221; clause.  That <em>legal equality</em> is a matter for public debate is just a total mindfuck to me: that ain&#8217;t what democracy is about.</p>
<p>The few Mainers I know were on the correct side of this issue, but the religious hatemongers apparently knew how to scare people into voting in greater numbers.   And every single one of those assholes deserves a big old kick in the crotch for their &#8220;some animals are more equal that others&#8221; bullshit.</p>
<p>If we have any locals among our readers, I&#8217;d appreciate whatever info you can share about how it looked on the ground, and what might happen now.  Is this issue dead in the water, or are there remedies? Can the government override the vote, pursue new legislation, or is it now a matter for the courts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/04/maine-in-my-neck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
