<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Pursuit of Harpyness &#187; The Academy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harpyness.com/tag/the-academy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harpyness.com</link>
	<description>As narrated by the most charming and vicious women on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Helpful Terms, Unhelpful Tips?</title>
		<link>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/03/helpful-terms-unhelpful-tips/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/03/helpful-terms-unhelpful-tips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PhDork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Academy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harpyness.com/?p=11405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We got a nifty link from reader Hill Rat yesterday (thanks, brah) that&#8217;s right in my wheelhouse:  its about a research project focusing on gender bias, particularly as it relates to the academy. First, check out this Gender Bias Bingo Card.  Not funny, like the original Anti-Feminist Bingo Card, but worth a gander.  The card sums [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got a nifty link from reader Hill Rat yesterday (thanks, brah) that&#8217;s right in my wheelhouse:  its about a research project focusing on gender bias, particularly as it relates to the academy.</p>
<p>First, check out this <a href="http://www.genderbiasbingo.com/games.html">Gender Bias Bingo Card</a>.  Not funny, like the original <a href="http://hoydenabouttown.com/20070414.431/anti-feminist-bingo-a-master-class-in-sexual-entitlement/">Anti-Feminist Bingo Card</a>, but worth a gander.  The card sums up the four major patterns of bias that this Center for Work-Life Law at the University of California at Hastings has identified:  Prove it Again, Gender Wars, Double Binds, and the Maternal Wall, which are all blurbed <a href="http://www.genderbiasbingo.com/stereotypes.html">here</a>.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve certainly talked about all of these things here&#8211;Double Binds seem evergreen, but Gender Wars seem to have come up quite a bit in our most recent topics.  They also tip their hat toward intersectionality with their &#8220;Double Jeopardy&#8221; category, but they limit it to race, rather than include sexuality, ability, age, weight, and all those other minefields.</p>
<p>If you wander around the site, you can see concepts explained, watch role-plays, take a quiz, and watch short clips of women offering &#8220;strategies&#8221; of varying helpfulness.  My unfavorite?  Mary Ann Mason (Esq.)&#8217;s advice to &#8220;soften&#8221; your message by smiling.  She also suggests women play by the boy&#8217;s rules by regulating your tone of voice.  Gaaaaaaaaaaaaah.  It&#8217;s that old &#8220;cope or change?&#8221; thing.  Even though I know we have to pick our battles, I want a revolution.  I don&#8217;t want to fucking smile.</p>
<p>It seems a <em>leetle</em> 101 to me (especially for what appear to be women a generation <em>older</em> than I), but I suppose that&#8217;s still necessary, even at the university, which I like to think of as something of a haven from the wall-to-wall sexism you might find in a less (generally speaking) liberal working environment.  One of the contributors made a good point that the university tenure system actually works against women, because sexist dinosaurs will stick around until they&#8217;re forced to leave,and their attitudes can set the tone for an entire department.  At another<a href="http://www.worklifelaw.org/EconomicsOfRetainingWomen.html"> link</a>, though, I found that more than half of tenured faculty are already over 55, so eventually, they will leave, even if it&#8217;s feet first.</p>
<p>I know we have some dorkidemics amongst our readers, and more than a few lawyers.  How do those terms feel to you?  Helpful?  Reductive?  One big DURRRRR?  What about for our corporate sisters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harpyness.com/2009/11/03/helpful-terms-unhelpful-tips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
